Federal Tax Conformity Bill Advances with Expanded R&D Incentives for Vermont Businesses

Federal Tax Conformity Bill Advances with Expanded R&D Incentives for Vermont Businesses

The House Ways and Means Committee has advanced a miscellaneous tax bill updating Vermont’s conformity with federal tax law and making several targeted changes to the state’s tax code.

While many provisions are technical, the decisions in this bill will influence how Vermont businesses calculate taxable income, deduct certain expenses, access tax incentives, and ultimately decide where to invest in research, development, and innovation.

Because Vermont does not automatically conform to federal tax law, the Legislature periodically reviews changes made by Congress and decides which provisions to adopt at the state level. Following the passage of H.R.1 last summer, lawmakers are now determining how those federal tax changes should apply within Vermont’s tax system — and where the state will take a different policy approach.

Why it matters: For businesses making investment decisions, these conformity updates can matter as much as changes to tax rates. The structure of deductions, credits, and cost recovery rules influences where companies choose to invest in equipment, research, and workforce expansion.

What This Means for Vermont Businesses

Federal conformity decisions shape how businesses calculate taxable income and how certain investments are treated under Vermont’s tax code.

Many provisions in this bill affect how companies recover the cost of investments such as equipment purchases, research and development, and financing. These rules influence how businesses plan capital investments, evaluate new projects, and forecast future tax liability.

Several federal provisions that expand deductions for operating expenses will flow through to Vermont, while lawmakers chose not to adopt certain federal tax preferences tied to investment income and international taxation.

For Vermont businesses, the practical result is straightforward: some federal tax changes will apply automatically to Vermont returns, while others will require separate state adjustments.

Research and Development Policy

Research and development policy is one of the most closely watched business provisions in the bill.

In recent years, federal tax rules changed how companies deduct research expenses, requiring many businesses to spread those deductions over five years rather than deducting them immediately.

Recent federal legislation restored immediate deductibility for smaller businesses. The House Ways and Means Committee advanced the following conformity choices:

  • Small businesses, as defined under federal law (those with average annual receipts under roughly $31 million), will be able to fully deduct research expenses.
  • Larger businesses will continue to amortize those expenses over five years for Vermont tax purposes.

Earlier concepts considered would have permanently disallowed the deduction of research expenses at the state level. That proposal raised significant concerns among innovation-driven employers.

The final structure reflects extensive collaboration among the House Ways and Means Committee, the Administration, tax professionals, and the Vermont Chamber of Commerce. Chair Kornheiser noted during the committee’s discussion the Vermont Chamber’s role in helping shape the R&D framework and bringing business expertise into the policy development process.

Major Expansion of Vermont’s R&D Tax Credit

The bill also significantly expands Vermont’s existing research and development tax credit.

Currently, Vermont’s credit equals 27 percent of the federal R&D credit for qualifying research conducted in the state.

The bill increases that rate to 75 percent of the federal credit and raises the annual statewide cap from $3 million to $4 million.

The takeaway: If enacted, this would represent one of the largest expansions of Vermont’s research incentive in recent years.

Other Federal Tax Changes Vermont Will Adopt

Several federal changes affecting business taxation will flow through to Vermont under the bill.

  • More generous expensing of business equipment: Federal law increased the amount businesses can immediately expense for depreciable assets from $1 million to $2.5 million. Vermont will conform to this change, allowing businesses to recover equipment costs more quickly.
  • Expanded business interest deductions: Federal law increased the allowable deduction for business interest from 30 percent to 50 percent of adjusted taxable income. Vermont will conform to this provision, allowing businesses with significant borrowing to deduct a larger share of interest expenses.
  • Changes to controlled foreign corporation reporting rules: Federal adjustments to pro rata share rules will flow through to Vermont, affecting companies that hold interests in certain foreign corporations.
  • Updates to corporate charitable deduction limits: Federal law changed how corporations calculate deductions for charitable contributions. Vermont will conform to those changes as well.
  • Federal expansion of the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit will also flow through to Vermont’s corresponding state credit.

Where Vermont Chose a Different Path

In several areas, the Committee chose not to adopt new federal tax preferences.

These include:

  • Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS): Federal law expanded the exclusion for capital gains on certain startup investments. Vermont will not conform to that change, meaning those gains remain taxable at the state level.
  • Section 250 international income deductions: The bill decouples Vermont from federal deductions related to certain international income earned by multinational corporations. This provision represents one of the largest revenue components in the bill.
  • Special depreciation for certain production facilities: Federal law created a new bonus depreciation provision for some manufacturing property. Vermont will not adopt that provision and will instead continue requiring the property to be depreciated over time.

The Bottom Line

Federal conformity bills often receive limited attention because many provisions are technical.

However, the choices made in these updates can significantly influence how Vermont businesses calculate taxable income and how the state structures economic incentives.

This year’s bill reflects a mix of policy decisions: adopting several federal changes that expand business deductions, declining to follow others that would reduce state revenue, and significantly expanding Vermont’s research and development tax credit.

The Vermont Chamber will continue working with policymakers to ensure Vermont’s tax system supports a competitive, predictable environment for the businesses that drive Vermont’s economy.

CONNECT WITH OUR TAX EXPERT

Amy Spear

President

Fiscal Policy, Taxation, Tourism and Hospitality, Workforce Development

RECENT NEWS

From Planning to Policy: Vermont’s Economic Moment Is Now

From Planning to Policy: Vermont’s Economic Moment Is Now

As Vermont lawmakers return to Montpelier following Town Meeting break, the legislative session enters the phase where ideas must become decisions. For Vermont’s economy, those decisions carry real consequences.

The first half of the session is often defined by hearings, proposals, and policy exploration. The second half is where priorities are tested, and choices become outcomes.

Over the past several years, Vermonters have done something important. We have invested significant time and energy into planning for the state’s economic future. The Vermont Futures Project’s Economic Action Plan brought together the perspectives of more than 5,000 Vermonters and established measurable goals for workforce growth, housing development, and long-term economic opportunity.

That effort produced something Vermont has historically lacked: a shared economic roadmap grounded in data.

But a roadmap alone does not move the state forward. Vermont has long excelled at identifying challenges, but progress requires moving beyond episodic decision making toward sustained economic strategy.

The question now is whether Vermont will translate that planning into policies capable of addressing the economic pressures businesses and families are experiencing today.

Those pressures are real.

Nationally, the economic outlook entering March reflects cautious resilience paired with continued uncertainty. Inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s long-term target; interest rates remain elevated, and many industries report difficulty finding workers while managing rising costs.

For Vermont, these national dynamics are amplified by structural challenges closer to home.

Recent economic competitiveness data place Vermont near the bottom nationally on measures including economic momentum, long term outlook, and workforce demographics. These rankings underscore the structural challenges the state must address to strengthen affordability and economic opportunity.

Demographics alone present a stark reality. Over 17,000 Vermonters are projected to retire annually this decade, while far fewer young workers are entering the labor force. To maintain economic stability, Vermont must add roughly 13,500 workers each year through population growth and workforce expansion.

At the same time, housing shortages continue to constrain that growth. The state will need tens of thousands of additional housing units to support the workforce Vermont’s economy requires.

When businesses cannot find workers, expansion stalls. When housing is unavailable or unaffordable, recruitment becomes nearly impossible. When regulatory timelines stretch into years instead of months, investment flows elsewhere.

Employers across Vermont are experiencing these pressures simultaneously.

There have been encouraging signs of progress. Conversations about health care affordability, housing infrastructure, and workforce recruitment reflect a growing recognition that Vermont’s affordability challenges are interconnected.

Vermonters are confronting rising property taxes and education costs that are intensifying the broader affordability conversation across communities. Recognizing the challenge, however, is not the same as solving it. If Vermont is serious about improving affordability and strengthening economic opportunity, several principles should guide the decisions ahead.

First, Vermont must strengthen fiscal predictability. State spending has grown significantly in recent years, placing pressure on the tax base that supports essential services. Businesses and families alike need stability and transparency in fiscal policy to make long term decisions about investment, hiring, and where to build their future.

Second, Vermont must modernize the regulatory systems that shape housing and economic development. Employers consistently report that permitting timelines and regulatory complexity increase costs and slow projects that communities need.

Third, Vermont must confront the reality of demographic change. A shrinking working age population is not a temporary challenge, but a structural shift that will shape Vermont’s economic capacity for decades. Addressing it requires coordinated strategies to recruit new residents, retain graduates, and expand housing and opportunity for the next generation of Vermonters.

These priorities reflect the areas the Vermont Chamber identified at the start of the legislative session and continue to guide our work in Montpelier as the session moves into its second half. These issues are not simply business concerns.

When businesses grow, they create jobs, support local tax bases, and sustain the services communities rely on, from schools and infrastructure to the small-town economies that define Vermont’s identity.

The Vermont Chamber of Commerce works to bring these economic realities into policy discussions every day in Montpelier. Representing employers of all sizes, industries, and regions of the state, the Chamber’s role is to ensure that the perspective of Vermont’s business community is part of the decision-making process.

Vermont has done the planning. The data is clear. The goals are defined.

The weeks ahead will determine whether Vermont translates that planning into policy and whether those policies lead to the action necessary to strengthen affordability, competitiveness, and opportunity across the state.

Vermont’s future is not predetermined. It will be shaped by the policy choices made in Montpelier in the weeks ahead.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Amy Spear

President

Fiscal Policy, Taxation, Tourism and Hospitality, Workforce Development

RECENT NEWS

Federal Tax Policy, Vermont Choices, and the Structure of R&D Policy

Federal Tax Policy, Vermont Choices, and the Structure of R&D Policy

The House Ways and Means Committee is considering changes to how Vermont defines taxable income for businesses that invest in research and development. Vermont companies spend millions of dollars each year on R&D across advanced manufacturing, software, biotechnology, and applied research. The tax treatment of those investments directly influences capital allocation, hiring decisions, and long-term competitiveness.

The proposal contains two interdependent components that must be evaluated together. In combination, these changes could materially shape Vermont’s innovation climate, affecting how growth-stage and capital-intensive firms evaluate future investment in the state.

What the Bill Does

The draft legislation makes two significant changes.

First, it adds back federal Section 174 deductions for research and experimental expenses. That means Vermont would not allow businesses to deduct their R&D expenses when calculating state taxable income.

Unlike other areas of the tax code, such as bonus depreciation, the draft does not restore those expenses through state level amortization. As written, R&D costs would not be deductible for Vermont tax purposes.

Second, the bill increases Vermont’s R&D tax credit from 27 percent to 75 percent of the federal R&D credit. That is a substantial increase and would make Vermont’s credit one of the most generous in the country.

These two provisions must be understood together.

What This Means in Practice

There are two primary ways states can treat R&D spending.

One approach is deductibility. Businesses subtract their R&D expenses from taxable income, just like wages, rent, or other operating costs.

Another approach is relying more heavily on tax credits, which apply only to businesses that calculate and qualify for the federal R&D credit and have sufficient tax liability to use it.

Under the existing draft, Vermont would move away from deductibility and rely more heavily on the expanded credit.

For Businesses That Claim the Federal R&D Credit

Businesses that calculate and claim the federal R&D credit would see a larger Vermont credit under the proposed 75 percent rate.

However, because the deduction would no longer be allowed, the total state tax benefit may be smaller than under a system that includes both deductibility and a credit. The outcome depends on each firm’s cost structure and federal credit calculation.

For Businesses That Incur R&D Expenses but Do Not Claim the Credit

Not all businesses that invest in R&D claim the federal credit. Some may not meet the qualification thresholds. Others may not calculate it due to complexity or cost.

Under the draft language, those businesses would lose deductibility of R&D expenses and would not receive the benefit of the credit increase. For those firms, the proposal would result in higher Vermont taxable income.

For Early Stage and Growing Firms

Firms in a loss position or early growth stage often rely on deductions to build net operating losses that can offset future income.

If R&D expenses are permanently disallowed for Vermont purposes, those costs would not be recoverable at the state level, which may affect long term planning and investment decisions.

Timing Versus Permanence

A key distinction in this debate is whether Vermont intends to delay deductibility or eliminate it.

If Vermont required R&D expenses to be amortized over several years, businesses would still recover their costs over time. That is a timing adjustment.

Under the existing draft, there is no amortization restoration. As written, the policy would permanently disallow deduction of R&D expenses at the state level.

That structural difference has meaningful economic implications.

Where the Opportunity and the Risk Sit

The increase to a 75 percent R&D credit is significant. If structured correctly, it could position Vermont as a strong competitor for innovation-based investment.

The risk lies in how the deduction and credit interact. If the credit expansion is paired with preserved cost recovery, the proposal could strengthen Vermont’s competitiveness while maintaining revenue balance. If deductibility is permanently removed, the policy becomes more uneven. Some firms would benefit from the higher credit. Others would see a durable increase in state taxable income.

The Bottom Line

This proposal is not simply about increasing a tax credit. It is about how Vermont defines taxable income for businesses that invest in research and development. Understanding whether the policy preserves deductibility or permanently eliminates it is essential to evaluating its impact.

The Vermont Chamber will continue to work with lawmakers to ensure that tax policy advances affordability, predictability, and long-term competitiveness while avoiding unintended consequences for the businesses that power Vermont’s economy.

CONNECT WITH OUR TAX EXPERT

Amy Spear

President

Fiscal Policy, Taxation, Tourism and Hospitality, Workforce Development

RECENT NEWS

Energy Policy: Modernization, Affordability, and Market Signals

Energy Policy: Modernization, Affordability, and Market Signals

As the Legislature approaches crossover, lawmakers are advancing several significant energy proposals. While varied in scope, each reflects a shared challenge: balancing Vermont’s climate objectives with affordability, regulatory clarity, and economic competitiveness.

Three proposals have emerged as focal points, each testing Vermont’s ability to modernize its energy framework without eroding affordability or predictability. Together, they underscore a broader question this session: how to advance climate policy while strengthening Vermont’s economic foundation.

Building Energy Standards

H.718 proposes structural updates to Vermont’s residential building energy standards framework (RBES/CBES). The bill would create a stakeholder task force to examine contractor registry updates, evaluate licensure requirements, and better align education standards across trades. It also provides clarity for builders who, in good faith, certified projects under RBES/CBES 2020 pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Order, ensuring they would be held harmless from liability.

Revisions since introduction have improved the bill’s structure and moved smaller-scale builders closer to a more stable regulatory framework. Predictability remains critical. In the Vermont Futures Project Business Climate Survey, employers consistently cite regulatory clarity as essential to housing production and workforce attraction. Housing supply, workforce growth, and energy policy remain structurally linked.

Questions remain regarding funding mechanisms and potential downstream compliance costs. As Vermont works to address its housing shortage, regulatory updates must align with administrative capacity to avoid unintended cost escalation. With crossover imminent and divisions remaining in committee, final adjustments will need to materialize quickly.

Expanding Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE)

S.138 would expand Vermont’s Property Assessed Clean Energy program to commercial and industrial buildings, allowing businesses to finance efficiency, renewable, and resilience improvements through long-term, fixed-rate property assessments.

At a time when federal incentives remain uncertain, the proposal offers a voluntary, market-based pathway for businesses to invest in efficiency and resilience. In other states, C-PACE programs have reduced operating costs, attracted private capital, and supported job creation. For Vermont employers, the program represents a financing tool rather than a mandate, aligning environmental progress with economic competitiveness.

After sustained stakeholder engagement and multiple revisions, S.138 appears positioned to advance before crossover.

Net Metering

H.716 would remove the adjuster applied to energy generated behind the meter, electricity produced and consumed on-site without reaching the grid. The bill also establishes battery storage goals and directs the Public Utility Commission to account for federal incentive conditions when setting rates.

Earlier language that would have capped the negative adjuster for net-metered energy has been removed, alleviating concerns about immediate cost increases for non-solar ratepayers. However, proposed behind-the-meter and battery-related changes introduce more complex structural questions.

Adjusting this framework outside the established biennial PUC review process could add complexity to one of the most intricate net metering systems in the country. There is also risk that cost shifts could increase rates for non-net-metered customers, undermining affordability for businesses and households alike. Preserving the PUC’s research-driven review process helps ensure that rate decisions remain grounded in economic analysis.

With new language introduced late in the process and crossover near, advancement of the bill in its current form appears uncertain.

What Happens Next

As crossover approaches, compressed timelines and consequential policy choices are converging.  Vermont’s long-term energy strategy must remain aligned with economic competitiveness, workforce growth, and housing development.

The central challenge is not whether Vermont advances its climate goals, but whether it does so in a way that reinforces affordability, regulatory clarity, and long-term economic durability. Striking that balance will determine whether this session’s energy reforms strengthen Vermont’s competitive position or introduce new layers of cost and complexity.

CONNECT WITH OUR ENERGY EXPERT

Jeremy Little

Policy and Outreach Associate

Environment and Energy, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Transportation

RECENT NEWS

Vermont Signature Events Award Winners Announced

Vermont Signature Events Award Winners Announced

The Vermont Chamber of Commerce and the Vermont Department of Tourism and Marketing have announced the winners for the 2026/27 Vermont Signature Events program. These signature events offer experiences that fuel the Vermont visitor economy. In 2024, visitor spending hit a record by contributing $4.2 billion to Vermont’s economy. 

2026/27 Vermont Signature Events: 

  • Hardwick State (April 17-19, 2026): For one weekend, Hardwick becomes a townwide university where community members teach and learn from one another. Anyone can be a teacher, and everybody is a student, with free or donation-based classes ranging from practical skills like tire changing and chainsaw repair to philosophy, crocheting, cake decorating, and improv comedy. 
  • Battenkill Fly Fishing and Art Festival (April 30–May 2, 2026): Held in Arlington, this three-day festival celebrates the spring-fed Battenkill River with speakers, workshops, fly-tyers, live music, a casting competition, a beer tent, and events centered on history, aquatic life, and sustainability. 
  • M&T Bank Vermont City Marathon & Relay Weekend (May 22–24, 2026): Vermont’s largest single-day sporting event takes over Burlington with a scenic, spectator-friendly marathon course, a sports and fitness expo, youth mini-marathons, and a lively post-race festival at Waterfront Park. 
  • Community Concerts on the Green (May 22–September 6, 2026): In Middlesex, Camp Meade hosts free live music every Friday and Sunday from Memorial Day through Labor Day, featuring local performers, art activities, artisan studios, food, drinks, and a relaxed community atmosphere. 
  • Naulakha Estate and Rhododendron Tour (June 5–7, 2026): Normally reserved for overnight guests, Rudyard Kipling’s historic Dummerston estate opens for self-guided tours, offering rare access to the grounds and the iconic rhododendron tunnel during peak bloom season. 
  • Jeezum Crow Festival (July 10–11, 2026): At Jay Peak Resort, this high-energy summer music festival features national and regional acts, local food and craft vendors, and a laid-back mountain setting. Past performers include Del McCoury, Dark Star Orchestra, and Yonder Mountain String Band. 
  • New World Festival (September 6, 2026): Downtown Randolph hosts this celebration of Celtic and Québécois traditional music and dance, with performances across five stages, street acts, called dances, kids’ activities, and food and drink from local vendors. 
  • Puppets in the Green Mountains (September 11–20, 2026): Based in Brattleboro, this biennial international festival showcases puppet theater for all ages through performances, workshops, and forums that emphasize creativity, compassion, and storytelling. 
  • Vermont Cheese Week (September 13–20, 2026): A statewide celebration featuring cheese-themed restaurant specials, farm tours, dinners, tastings, and special events that highlight Vermont’s award-winning cheesemakers and the landscapes behind their craft. 
  • Cores and Pours (September 18, 2026): In Woodstock, this evening event invites visitors to explore Vermont’s small-batch cider scene with guided tastings led by a local pommelier, meet artisanal cider-makers, and enjoy local food offerings. 
  • Rocktoberfest (September 26, 2026): Morrisville’s Portland Street transforms into a lively fall street festival with live bands, an Adirondack Chair Auction, dance performances, family activities, and food and retail vendors in a free, community-focused setting. 
  • Vermont Circus Festival (November 1–8, 2026): Presented in Brattleboro by the New England Center for Circus Arts, this weeklong festival features circus workshops, performances, community events, and multiple shows ranging from cabaret to experimental circus. 

The Vermont Signature Events program offers an invaluable opportunity for events to garner widespread recognition. Signature events are awarded annually and showcase the rich variety of experiences to be had in the Green Mountains. These top-rated events offer a true taste of all that is local, bringing visitors into the heart of communities and serving as an important component in the Vermont visitor economy. 

Learn more about the Vermont Signature Events program and access the 2027/28 application here.

Nominations Open for the 2026 Vermont Economic Leadership & Impact Awards

Nominations Open for the 2026 Vermont Economic Leadership & Impact Awards
The Vermont Chamber of Commerce is accepting nominations for the Vermont Economic Leadership & Impact Awards. Each year, the Vermont Chamber recognizes individuals whose leadership and service advance Vermont’s economy and strengthen our communities. The two award categories include ‘Citizen of the Year’ and ‘Above and Beyond.’
 
The Citizen of the Year award recognizes an individual who:
  • Made major contributions to the betterment of Vermont
  • Been distinguished through outstanding service to the community and region
  • Typifies the true spirit of service and self-sacrifice in representing the finest ideals of Vermont citizenship. 
The Above and Beyond Award recognizes an individual who:
  • Demonstrate excellence and outstanding achievement through initiative, innovation, or creative problem solving.
  • Reinforce and elevate the values of their organization through professionalism and dedication.
  • Lead with integrity, setting a high personal standard and fostering a collaborative team environment.
  • Go above and beyond expectations through perseverance, accountability, and commitment to results.
  • Make a meaningful and sustained impact on their industry by sharing knowledge and building strong professional relationships.

Prior recipients of the Citizen of the Year Award include (2025) Major General Gregory Knight, (2024) Tom Dee, and (2023) Senator Patrick Leahy.

Nominations can be submitted online here until March 1.

Act 250 Update: Continued Progress, but Execution Risks Are Becoming Clearer

Act 250 Update: Continued Progress, but Execution Risks Are Becoming Clearer

This week’s testimony before the Senate Natural Resources Committee showed continued progress on working toward technical corrections to Act 181, the Act 250 reform adopted in 2024. But it also made clear that execution, not intent, is now the central challenge. Act 181 set an ambitious direction, encouraging housing in planned growth areas while protecting critical natural resources. Whether it succeeds will depend on whether the implementation phase delivers clarity, consistency, and confidence.

Regional planning commissions reported steady movement on Tier 1B mapping, with five commissions having submitted plans and three already receiving feedback from the Land Use Review Board. State level review of regional future land use maps is an important step. At the same time, RPCs were clear that evolving guidance and iterative feedback from the board are creating uncertainty. Regions that submitted early may be held to different standards than those submitting later, not because policy changed, but because interpretation is still developing. That inequity matters, especially when communities are being asked to make long-term planning decisions.

Tier 1B remains one of the most promising elements of Act 181. Eligibility is expected to cover roughly two to three percent of Vermont’s land area, a meaningful expansion from the approximately 0.3 percent previously eligible for downtown and village center incentives but still likely insufficient to meet the state’s housing needs. Tier 1B allows up to 50 housing units without Act 250 review in mapped growth areas. The intent is clear: give communities a real tool to support housing. The risk is that uncertainty in mapping, review standards, or timing undermines that goal.

Housing targets developed by the Vermont Housing Finance Agency and the Department of Housing and Community Development further reinforced that Vermont’s challenge is not hitting a precise unit count, but unlocking the housing market and building momentum. That requires signaling, through policy and implementation, that Vermont is open to housing in the places it has planned for growth.

Tier 3 remains the most concerning element of implementation. The Land Use Review Board described draft mapping and rulemaking focused on habitat connectors and other sensitive areas. While the board emphasized that Tier 3 is intended to be limited in scope and to avoid overlap with existing regulations, even board members acknowledged that many Vermonters do not yet understand how Tier 3 will work or whether it will apply to them. That lack of clarity is not a minor issue. It directly affects landowners, municipalities, and housing developers trying to make decisions now.

The board has asked for additional time to refine Tier 3 maps, narrow affected areas, and conduct outreach, including extending effective dates for Tier 3, the road rule, and Criterion 8C to December 31, 2027.

Tier 1A implementation raised similar red flags. Requiring municipalities to assume responsibility for administering existing Act 250 permits is a real deterrent for communities that might otherwise opt in. Testimony clarified that permits would transition gradually as they are amended, but without clear statutory guardrails, uncertainty remains. Communities need assurance that participation will not come with unmanageable administrative risk.

The Senate Natural Resources Committee appears to recognize these risks. Discussion around S.325 has focused on technical corrections that improve clarity, align timelines, and reduce unintended barriers to housing, rather than reopening last year’s policy debate.

From the Vermont Chamber’s perspective, the path forward is clear. Act 181 can work, but only if implementation prioritizes predictability, consistency, and momentum. That means clear standards from the Land Use Review Board, fair treatment of early and late adopters, realistic timelines, and a permitting system that supports housing in growth areas rather than slowing it through uncertainty.

The Vermont Chamber will continue to advocate for these corrections. It is the difference between a reform that delivers housing and economic vitality, and one that stalls under the weight of its own complexity.

CONNECT WITH OUR LAND USE EXPERT

Megan Sullivan

Vice President of Government Affairs

Economic Development, Fiscal Policy, Healthcare, Housing, Land Use/Permitting, Technology

RECENT NEWS

Workforce Regulations: Momentum, Headwinds, and Legislative Outlook

Workforce Regulations: Momentum, Headwinds, and Legislative Outlook

As lawmakers consider new workforce mandates this session, Vermont employers are facing a challenging economic context. Vermont ranks last in the nation for economic momentum and seventh for regulatory burden on the Vermont Competitiveness Dashboard. That broader picture aligns with what employers told the Vermont Chamber in our Business Climate Survey, where regulation consistently ranks among the top concerns.

Against that backdrop, the Vermont Chamber has been actively engaged at the State House this session, testifying on multiple workforce bills. Three proposals in particular highlight where legislation is gaining momentum, where policy and procedural complexity are creating headwinds, and where a proposal appears unlikely to advance this session.

Noncompete Agreements

  • What the bill proposes
    The noncompete legislation would broadly prohibit noncompete agreements, while allowing limited, tightly defined exceptions. These include certain business transactions, severance agreements, and a narrow category of exempt employees, with guardrails around income thresholds, advance notice, and reasonableness standards related to time, geography, and scope.
  • Vermont Chamber position
    The Vermont Chamber has emphasized that any statutory changes should align closely with existing Vermont case law, which already evaluates noncompete agreements using a reasonableness standard. In testimony this week, we noted that outside of health care, it is fair to ask what specific Vermont problem is being addressed beyond what current law already covers. At the same time, the Vermont Chamber has remained engaged throughout the process to help shape language that provides clarity and predictability, reflects how courts have historically evaluated these agreements, and results in an outcome that stakeholders across sectors can live with.
  • Legislative Outlook: Gaining Momentum

This has been a longstanding priority for the committee, significant time has been invested, and the bill reflects a negotiated outcome shaped by stakeholder input. It is one of the more likely workforce bills to move this session.

Workers’ Compensation and Family and Medical Leave

  • What the bill proposes
    The proposal would prohibit certain employers from counting workers’ compensation leave for a work-related injury or illness toward Vermont’s family and medical leave requirements, effectively requiring these leave systems to run sequentially rather than concurrently.
  • Vermont Chamber position
    The Vermont Chamber’s testimony emphasized that workers’ compensation and family and medical leave serve different purposes and currently work together in a coordinated way. Workers’ compensation provides wage replacement and medical coverage, while family and medical leave provides job protection. Changing how these systems interact has real consequences for both employers and injured workers, particularly around job protection during recovery, return to work planning, and staffing predictability. Testimony made clear that this issue is far more complex than initially anticipated and warrants careful evaluation.
  • Legislative Outlook: Facing Headwinds With only eight working days before crossover, multiple competing committee priorities, and significant technical and legal complexity involved, advancing this proposal meaningfully this session would be challenging.

Flexible Work Arrangements

  • What the bill proposes
    The flexible work arrangements proposal would substantially change existing law by expanding the types of requests covered and shifting from a right-to-request framework toward a presumption that requests should be granted. It would narrow the circumstances under which an employer could deny a request, require more detailed written justifications for denial, shorten response timelines, and increase documentation and recordkeeping requirements.
  • Vermont Chamber position
    The Vermont Chamber provided the only testimony on this proposal. Vermont already has one of the most comprehensive flexible working arrangements statutes in the country, and available enforcement data show very few employee complaints since the law took effect. From the Vermont Chamber’s perspective, the proposal did not identify a clear problem or evidence that the existing framework is failing employees, making it a solution in search of a problem.
  • Legislative Outlook: Unlikely to Advance

The flexible work provision has been removed from the bill that is advancing and sent to the Government Operations Committee, significantly reducing the likelihood of action this session.

What happens next

The legislative session is far from over, and nothing is final until the gavel falls. Committee priorities can shift quickly, amendments can reappear, and issues that cool off one week can heat up the next. These classifications reflect the best read of where these workforce proposals stand today, based on testimony, committee focus, and the time remaining in the session. The Vermont Chamber will continue to stay engaged, track changes closely, and represent Vermont employers as these and other workforce issues evolve in the weeks ahead.

CONNECT WITH OUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXPERT

Megan Sullivan

Vice President of Government Affairs

Economic Development, Fiscal Policy, Healthcare, Housing, Land Use/Permitting, Technology

RECENT NEWS

Education Reform is Everything, Everywhere, All At Once

Education Reform is Everything, Everywhere, All At Once

Education reform is dominating the agenda at the State House, yet there is still no single clear path forward. As crossover nears, lawmakers are being asked to make foundational decisions about cost, quality, governance, equity, and workforce readiness simultaneously. The pressure to act is colliding with unresolved tradeoffs.

Education spending has become the central policy arena where affordability, opportunity, and long-term economic competitiveness intersect.

Cost and Quality Are Inseparable

Education spending remains the largest driver of property tax pressure, creating real affordability challenges for households and employers. Yet lawmakers are clear: cost control alone cannot be the goal. Reform must protect educational quality, expand opportunity, and deliver equitable outcomes statewide.

Affordability without quality is unsustainable. Quality without fiscal discipline is unattainable.

Act 73 established a foundation-style funding system and statewide property tax framework intended to better align spending with student needs. But many critical implementation decisions remain unsettled. Yield setting, cost allocation, and fiscal modeling assumptions are still under debate as school budget deadlines approach.

Without clarity, communities and employers cannot reliably anticipate property tax impacts, reinforcing broader concerns about fiscal predictability.

Governance and Rural Realities

Governance and redistricting have emerged as some of the most visible and contentious elements of reform. The House Education Committee continues reviewing consolidation models, with cautious support from statewide education organizations for smaller districts than originally proposed. That support remains conditional and focused on minimizing disruption for students and families.

Debate continues over how to structure superintendent oversight and define consolidation metrics. Should it be driven by student population, number of schools, principals, or a blended formula? These questions play out differently in rural and urban communities, where geography, transportation, and staffing capacity vary widely.

For many rural communities, governance reform is not just structural, it is about identity, access, and operational feasibility.

Equity, Choice, and Tuitioning Towns

Equity considerations run through nearly every aspect of the debate. Lawmakers continue to examine the role of independent schools, eligibility standards, and the future of tuitioning towns.

For tuitioning communities, the issue is continuity and access. For the broader system, it is fairness, consistency, and cost exposure. Rural areas emphasize transportation and limited capacity, while more densely populated communities focus on scale and administrative burden.

Durable reform must recognize Vermont’s geographic diversity and avoid one-size-fits-all solutions that create unintended inequities.

Career and Technical Education and Workforce Alignment

Career and technical education remains central to the conversation. Act 73 anticipated additional work to incorporate CTE into the foundation formula, recognizing its role in workforce readiness and economic mobility.

Workforce alignment is not peripheral, it is foundational to Vermont’s long-term competitiveness.

A sweeping proposal would significantly restructure CTE governance and funding through a new statewide education service agency model. Supporters argue it could expand access and better align programs with workforce demand. Legislators have raised unresolved questions about transportation, regional voice, accountability, staffing, administrative costs, and funding flow.

The core question is whether centralization would increase efficiency and consistency, or distance programs from local workforce needs and community partnerships.

Fiscal Uncertainty and Pressure

Fiscal uncertainty has been especially visible in House Ways and Means. Updated school budget data, yield setting, and cost drivers remain under review. Briefings from the Joint Fiscal Office reinforce that unsettled district boundaries, unresolved labor costs, and regional variation limit the reliability of current modeling.

Lawmakers have expressed frustration about evaluating proposals without clear evidence of how they will affect both property taxes and student outcomes, even as expectations for near-term affordability relief rise.

Delivering immediate tax stabilization while redesigning the system presents a significant structural challenge.

The Broader Economic Context

This debate is unfolding against a broader economic backdrop. The Vermont Futures Project Economic Action Plan and Vermont Competitiveness Dashboard consistently highlight workforce shortages, demographic decline, cost of living pressures, and tax burden.

Education policy directly shapes workforce development, employer confidence, and long-term growth.

A system that is unaffordable is not sustainable. A system focused narrowly on cost without protecting quality and equity will fail students and weaken Vermont’s long-term economic prospects.

What Happens Next

As crossover approaches, committees are advancing major proposals on governance, funding, equity, and workforce alignment, but many difficult questions remain unresolved.

Education reform will remain the center of gravity at the State House throughout this biennium. The decisions made in the coming weeks will shape school governance, property tax bills, student opportunity, workforce readiness, and Vermont’s long-term competitiveness.

The Vermont Chamber will continue engaging with a focus on affordability, predictability, workforce alignment, and data-informed outcomes that support both students and Vermont employers.

CONNECT WITH OUR EDUCATION EXPERT

Megan Sullivan

Vice President of Government Affairs

Economic Development, Fiscal Policy, Healthcare, Housing, Land Use/Permitting, Technology

RECENT NEWS

Senate Begins Coordinated Work on Act 250 Reform Implementation

Senate Begins Coordinated Work on Act 250 Reform Implementation

Senators have begun a coordinated review of how Vermont’s Act 250 land use transformation is going after major reforms were adopted in 2024 through Act 181. Act 250 has been a cornerstone of land use and development policy in Vermont for decades, and reform represented a significant shift in how housing and other growth-related developments are permitted. As one of the most consequential land use reforms in recent years, implementation will play a critical role in determining whether the law achieves its intended balance between environmental stewardship and housing production.

Act 181 was designed to encourage housing production in planned growth areas while maintaining protections for critical natural resources. As the law moves from paper into practice, the Legislature is hearing from stakeholders about early implementation challenges and questions about transition timing, consistency, and clarity. This implementation phase is where legislative intent meets on-the-ground reality, and where predictability and administrative clarity become essential for communities and businesses alike.

This conversation started with a joint hearing of the Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee and the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee, where lawmakers heard from the Vermont Chamber as well as planners, municipal leaders, and conservation advocates on how the new system is working and where adjustments may be needed. A second hearing followed that allowed committees to dig deeper into specific areas such as the opt-in of communities into growth areas that will be exempted from Act 250.

In response to input, the Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee has drafted language that would make targeted, technical updates to address some of the challenges in S.325. This bill approaches corrections by focusing on fine-tuning implementation to match legislative intent and avoid unintended consequences.

The Vermont Chamber has testified three times as part of this process, reflecting its long-standing role as an engaged stakeholder and collaborator in shaping workable policy solutions. Testimony has centered on ensuring that time is taken to get things right which in turn does not inadvertently slow housing production or introduce unnecessary complexity.

As the Legislature continues its review, the Vermont Chamber has encouraged lawmakers to focus on several priority issues:

  • Maintaining temporary Act 250 housing exemptions while municipalities and regional planning commissions complete the planning and mapping work required under the new law.
  • Providing additional time before new Act 250 triggers take effect, including provisions related to Tier 3 areas and the Road Rule, to allow for technical refinement and stakeholder engagement.
  • Clarifying how Act 250 review applies when a project affects a specific natural resource, so projects are evaluated only on the criteria needed to protect that resource, rather than undergoing a full review by default.
  • Shifting responsibility away from municipalities for administering existing Act 250 permits in Tier 1A areas to ensure that isn’t a barrier for communities that could have Tier 1A.
  • Studying how to address appeals of municipal zoning decisions in growth areas, with the goal of reducing duplicative or non-material appeals while preserving legitimate environmental and community oversight.

Together, these refinements are aimed at strengthening predictability in Vermont’s permitting landscape while upholding environmental protections and supporting needed housing development.

The discussion now underway reflects a recognition among lawmakers and stakeholders that large-scale reforms succeed or fail on implementation. Act 181 intentionally shifted significant work into the transition period and technical clarification, and adjustments are not unreasonable as the new system is phased in.

The Vermont Chamber will continue engaging with lawmakers and stakeholders as this work unfolds. Practical refinements that balance environmental protection with critical housing production and economic vitality will be critical to Vermont’s long-term affordability and competitiveness.

CONNECT WITH OUR LAND USE EXPERT

Megan Sullivan

Vice President of Government Affairs

Economic Development, Fiscal Policy, Healthcare, Housing, Land Use/Permitting, Technology

RECENT NEWS