Issue Updates from the State House | Week of March 23, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of March 23, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Property Taxes: The House advanced H.949 on a vote of 78-61-9, a bill that would use half of the state’s $104.9 one-time funds to uniformly buy down rate increases to an average property tax increase of 7 percent. The bill would also preemptively allocate the other half of the one-time money for the education fund for buy downs in future years. This falls short of the Governor’s proposal to use the full one-time funds this year, and legislators have yet to create the structural change needed to reign in education spending.
  • Education Spending: The Senate advanced S.220, a bill that would redefine excess education spending and lower the excess education threshold from 118% to 112%, an approach intended to slow education cost growth and reduce the number of districts triggering the excess spending penalty. The bill now moves to the House Ways and Means Committee.
  • Act 250: After lengthy and highly contentious floor debate, the Senate advanced S.325, a bill that would make amendments to 2024’s Act 181 including moving interim exemptions to 2030, delaying the road rule until 2030, and delaying the implementation of tier 3 until July 208 and given the land use review additional guidance to change the current trajectory of the underlying bills implementation. The bill now moves to the House.
  • Housing Availability: The Senate advanced S.328, a bill that would expand the authority of the Vermont Economic Development Association to finance certain housing projects and study legal measures needed to require common interest communities to allow long term rentals, operation of family child care homes, and the building of accessory dwelling units on a homeowner’s property. The bill now moves to the House.
  • Economic Development: The Senate advanced S.327, a bill that establishes two new task forces to pursue a new culinary institute and improve Vermont-New York economic relations, and that would repeal the VEGI sunset. The Vermont Chamber is named in both task forces remaining, and the bill now moves to the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee.
  • Primary Care: The Senate advanced S.197, a bill aimed at increasing the use of primary care to reduce strain on hospital systems. This step toward long-term healthcare cost containment now moves to the House Health Care Committee.
  • Vocational Rehabilitation: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee continued review of S.173, a bill proposing modifications to Vermont’s vocations rehabilitation program and hearing testimony on the need for independent pre-screening processes. Continuing these processes, enacting more cost-effective and coordinated rehabilitation plans, and improving outcome tracking to ensure meaningful program improvements remains vital.
  • Data Brokers: The House advanced H.211 a bill that attempts to tighten oversight of data brokers through new registration, reporting, and consumer protection requirements, but in doing so introduces a complex and expanding regulatory framework that has caused serious concern from industry leaders. The bill now moves to the Senate.
  • International Trade: The House Commerce and Economic Development and Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committees welcomed representatives from Japan and Taiwan, reinforcing Vermont’s international economic partnerships. Strengthening global relationships remains key to building a diverse, resilient, and competitive state economy.
  • Cannabis: The Senate advanced S.278, a bill that would establish cannabis event permits modeled after alcohol event permits, allow retailers to sell higher quantities, and repeal integrated license provisions. A floor amendment offered by the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee added a provision allowing for future joining of interstate commercial cannabis compacts, providing an additional venue of sale for Vermont Cannabis retailers. The bill now moves to the House.
  • Building Energy Code: The House advanced H.718, a bill that would create structural updates to Vermont’s residential building standards framework for residences with fewer than three dwelling units. The bill now moves to the Senate.
  • Event Ticketing: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee continued work on H.512, legislation aimed at curbing excessive resale of event tickets and strengthening consumer protections for venues using online ticketing platforms. The committee raised concerns about how price caps could impact safety and transparency in the resale market and will continue refining the bill to ensure it achieves its intended outcomes.
  • Sister State: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee reviewed H.674, a bill passed by that House that creates a process for establishing additional Vermont Sister States in order to strengthen Vermont’s international engagement. In its review, the committee focused on standardizing international relationships and dug into the bill’s stringent rules around spending.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of March 9, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of March 9, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): The Senate Education Committee unanimously advanced S.313, a bill outlining legislative intent to establish governance models, expand access to CTE programs, align graduation credits, and integrate adult education. As the bill moves to the Senate floor, continued collaboration and attention to implementation details will be essential to turn these goals into practical outcomes.
  • Act 250: The Senate Natural Resources committee unanimously advanced S.325, a bill that would make amendments to 2024’s Act 181 and allow more time to make technical corrections to the Act including moving interim exemptions to 2030, delaying the road rule until 2030, and delaying the implementation of tier 3 until July 2028. The bill now moves to the Senate Appropriations for further consideration.
  • Event Ticketing: The House advanced H.512, a legislation aimed at curbing excessive resale of event tickets and strengthening consumer protections for venues using online ticketing platforms. The bill now moves to the Senate for further consideration.
  • Sister State Program: The House Appropriations committee unanimously advanced H.674, a bill that would remove the repeal of the Ireland Trade Commission and establish a process for establishing additional Vermont Sister States, strengthening Vermont’s international engagement and to fostering mutually beneficial relationships with governments outside the United States. The bill now moves to the House Floor.
  • School Budgets: The House Ways and Means Committee heard updated school budget statistics following Town Meeting week, showing that 36 of the 102 passed school budgets increased by more than 6 percent. Changes in federal funding, rising healthcare costs, and overall price increases continue to highlight the structural spending pressures facing Vermont’s education system.
  • Relocating Revenue: The House Ways and Means Committee continues to weigh options to address funding shortfalls in both the Education and Transportation Funds. A proposal would shift a portion of the Vehicle Purchase and Use Tax to the Transportation Fund while moving part of the Sales and Use Tax to the Education Fund to maintain level funding during the transition, helping stabilize transportation revenue as broader education spending reforms remain necessary.
  • Primary Care: The Senate Health and Welfare Committee unanimously advanced S.197, a bill aimed at increasing the use of primary care to reduce strain on hospital systems. This step toward long-term healthcare cost containment now moves to the Senate floor.
  • Reference Based Pricing: The Senate Health and Welfare unanimously advanced S.190, a bill continuing momentum towards health care cost containment efforts by increasing price transparency and moving the Green Mountain Care Board closer to implementation of reference-based pricing. The bill now moves to the Senate Floor.
  • Housing Solutions: The House Ways and Means committee advanced H.775, legislation aimed at promoting more efficient housing development and creating accountability for municipal housing targets. The bill now moves to the House Appropriations Committee for further consideration.
  • Parental and Family Medical Leave: The House General and Housing committee reviewed but declined to advance H.459, which have would have prohibited the concurrent use of Workers Compensation and Parental and Family Medical Leave. By not advancing the bill before the crossover deadline, the committee preserved existing policies that support job protection timelines, return-to-work planning, and staffing predictability for employers.
  • Water Connections: The Senate advanced S.212, a bill aimed at streamlining the wastewater connections permitting process and enhancing coordination of municipal and state-level permitting systems. This measure would help reduce timelines and increase the efficiency of new development projects and now moves to the House.
  • Economic Development: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee unanimously advanced S.327, a bill that invests in further funds for the downtown center tax credit, business support services and studies, removes the VEGI sunset, and establishes task forces to study potential for a new culinary institute and an interstate highway alternative to Route 22A. The Vermont Chamber is named in both task forces, and the bill now moves to the Senate floor.
  • Event Permitting: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee unanimously advanced S.278, a bill that would establish cannabis event permits modeled after alcohol event permits, allow retailers to sell higher quantities, and repeal integrated license provisions. The bill now moves to the Senate Floor.
  • Building Energy Code: The House Energy and Digital Infrastructure committee advanced on a 6-3 vote H.718, a bill that would create structural updates to Vermont’s residential building standards framework for residences with fewer than three dwelling units. The bill now moves to the House Appropriations Committee for further consideration.
  • Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE): The Senate Natural Resources and Energy committee unanimously advanced S.138, a bill that would expand Vermont’s PACE program to commercial and industrial buildings, allowing businesses to finance efficiency, renewable, and resilience improvements through long-term, fixed-rate property assessments. The bill now moves to the Senate Floor.
  • Tax Classification: The House Ways and Means committee continued work on expanding property tax classifications from two to three categories. Final edits and a vote are expected by the end of next week.
  • Education Misses the Mark: With the policy crossover deadline now past, House and Senate Education committees failed to advance meaningful education reform on the timeline established in Act 73 last year. Despite having nine legislative weeks to act following a taxpayer- funded summer task force, the committees will now seek special permission to continue work beyond the deadline as pressure mounts to address rising education costs and system reform.
  • Education Spending: The Senate Finance Committee on a 5-2 vote advanced S.220. The bill would limit how much school districts can increase per-pupil education spending in FY2028 and FY2029 by establishing an allowable growth rate tied to prior year spending, an approach intended to slow education cost growth and reduce the number of districts triggering the excess spending penalty. The bill now moves to the Senate Floor.
  • Housing Availability: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee on a unanimously advanced S.328, a bill that would fund important housing programs and study legal measures needed to require common interest communities to allow long term rentals, operation of family child care homes, and the building of accessory dwelling units on a homeowner’s property. The bill now moves to the Senate Floor.
  • Noncompete: The House recommitted H.205, a bill broadly prohibiting non-compete agreements with limited exceptions, back to the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee. While the language could still reappear in other labor-related legislation later this session, the move represents a significant setback for the bill brought on by disparate treatment of business and educational settings.
  • Franchises: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee voted to unanimously advance H.733, a bill requiring businesses filing with the Secretary of State to indicate if the business is operating as a franchisee or franchisor. If voted out of committee, the bill will move to the House Floor.
  • Healthcare: The House Health Care committee on a 8-3 vote advanced H.585. The bill retains the allowance of Association Health Plans in 2028 if Federal law changes but adds a study due in 2027 on potential impacts to the Qualified Health Plans. These plans could be an important option for businesses and entrepreneurs struggling with high costs and limited options. The bill now moves to the House Floor.
  • Private Equity in Healthcare: The House Health Care committee is expected to vote later today on H.583, a bill regulating private equity in healthcare related private businesses. While the bill has improved since introduction, the Senate will need to consider the highly problematic provisions that persist relating to regulation and reporting requirements for privately owned businesses. The bill will move to the House Floor if advanced.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Federal Tax Conformity Bill Advances with Expanded R&D Incentives for Vermont Businesses

Federal Tax Conformity Bill Advances with Expanded R&D Incentives for Vermont Businesses

The House Ways and Means Committee has advanced a miscellaneous tax bill updating Vermont’s conformity with federal tax law and making several targeted changes to the state’s tax code.

While many provisions are technical, the decisions in this bill will influence how Vermont businesses calculate taxable income, deduct certain expenses, access tax incentives, and ultimately decide where to invest in research, development, and innovation.

Because Vermont does not automatically conform to federal tax law, the Legislature periodically reviews changes made by Congress and decides which provisions to adopt at the state level. Following the passage of H.R.1 last summer, lawmakers are now determining how those federal tax changes should apply within Vermont’s tax system — and where the state will take a different policy approach.

Why it matters: For businesses making investment decisions, these conformity updates can matter as much as changes to tax rates. The structure of deductions, credits, and cost recovery rules influences where companies choose to invest in equipment, research, and workforce expansion.

What This Means for Vermont Businesses

Federal conformity decisions shape how businesses calculate taxable income and how certain investments are treated under Vermont’s tax code.

Many provisions in this bill affect how companies recover the cost of investments such as equipment purchases, research and development, and financing. These rules influence how businesses plan capital investments, evaluate new projects, and forecast future tax liability.

Several federal provisions that expand deductions for operating expenses will flow through to Vermont, while lawmakers chose not to adopt certain federal tax preferences tied to investment income and international taxation.

For Vermont businesses, the practical result is straightforward: some federal tax changes will apply automatically to Vermont returns, while others will require separate state adjustments.

Research and Development Policy

Research and development policy is one of the most closely watched business provisions in the bill.

In recent years, federal tax rules changed how companies deduct research expenses, requiring many businesses to spread those deductions over five years rather than deducting them immediately.

Recent federal legislation restored immediate deductibility for smaller businesses. The House Ways and Means Committee advanced the following conformity choices:

  • Small businesses, as defined under federal law (those with average annual receipts under roughly $31 million), will be able to fully deduct research expenses.
  • Larger businesses will continue to amortize those expenses over five years for Vermont tax purposes.

Earlier concepts considered would have permanently disallowed the deduction of research expenses at the state level. That proposal raised significant concerns among innovation-driven employers.

The final structure reflects extensive collaboration among the House Ways and Means Committee, the Administration, tax professionals, and the Vermont Chamber of Commerce. Chair Kornheiser noted during the committee’s discussion the Vermont Chamber’s role in helping shape the R&D framework and bringing business expertise into the policy development process.

Major Expansion of Vermont’s R&D Tax Credit

The bill also significantly expands Vermont’s existing research and development tax credit.

Currently, Vermont’s credit equals 27 percent of the federal R&D credit for qualifying research conducted in the state.

The bill increases that rate to 75 percent of the federal credit and raises the annual statewide cap from $3 million to $5 million.

The takeaway: If enacted, this would represent one of the largest expansions of Vermont’s research incentive in recent years.

Other Federal Tax Changes Vermont Will Adopt

Several federal changes affecting business taxation will flow through to Vermont under the bill.

  • More generous expensing of business equipment: Federal law increased the amount businesses can immediately expense for depreciable assets from $1 million to $2.5 million. Vermont will conform to this change, allowing businesses to recover equipment costs more quickly.
  • Expanded business interest deductions: Federal law increased the allowable deduction for business interest from 30 percent to 50 percent of adjusted taxable income. Vermont will conform to this provision, allowing businesses with significant borrowing to deduct a larger share of interest expenses.
  • Changes to controlled foreign corporation reporting rules: Federal adjustments to pro rata share rules will flow through to Vermont, affecting companies that hold interests in certain foreign corporations.
  • Updates to corporate charitable deduction limits: Federal law changed how corporations calculate deductions for charitable contributions. Vermont will conform to those changes as well.
  • Federal expansion of the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit will also flow through to Vermont’s corresponding state credit.

Where Vermont Chose a Different Path

In several areas, the Committee chose not to adopt new federal tax preferences.

These include:

  • Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS): Federal law expanded the exclusion for capital gains on certain startup investments. Vermont will not conform to that change, meaning those gains remain taxable at the state level.
  • Section 250 international income deductions: The bill decouples Vermont from federal deductions related to certain international income earned by multinational corporations. This provision represents one of the largest revenue components in the bill.
  • Special depreciation for certain production facilities: Federal law created a new bonus depreciation provision for some manufacturing property. Vermont will not adopt that provision and will instead continue requiring the property to be depreciated over time.

The Bottom Line

Federal conformity bills often receive limited attention because many provisions are technical.

However, the choices made in these updates can significantly influence how Vermont businesses calculate taxable income and how the state structures economic incentives.

This year’s bill reflects a mix of policy decisions: adopting several federal changes that expand business deductions, declining to follow others that would reduce state revenue, and significantly expanding Vermont’s research and development tax credit.

The Vermont Chamber will continue working with policymakers to ensure Vermont’s tax system supports a competitive, predictable environment for the businesses that drive Vermont’s economy.

CONNECT WITH OUR TAX EXPERT

Amy Spear

President

Fiscal Policy, Taxation, Tourism and Hospitality, Workforce Development

RECENT NEWS

From Planning to Policy: Vermont’s Economic Moment Is Now

From Planning to Policy: Vermont’s Economic Moment Is Now

As Vermont lawmakers return to Montpelier following Town Meeting break, the legislative session enters the phase where ideas must become decisions. For Vermont’s economy, those decisions carry real consequences.

The first half of the session is often defined by hearings, proposals, and policy exploration. The second half is where priorities are tested, and choices become outcomes.

Over the past several years, Vermonters have done something important. We have invested significant time and energy into planning for the state’s economic future. The Vermont Futures Project’s Economic Action Plan brought together the perspectives of more than 5,000 Vermonters and established measurable goals for workforce growth, housing development, and long-term economic opportunity.

That effort produced something Vermont has historically lacked: a shared economic roadmap grounded in data.

But a roadmap alone does not move the state forward. Vermont has long excelled at identifying challenges, but progress requires moving beyond episodic decision making toward sustained economic strategy.

The question now is whether Vermont will translate that planning into policies capable of addressing the economic pressures businesses and families are experiencing today.

Those pressures are real.

Nationally, the economic outlook entering March reflects cautious resilience paired with continued uncertainty. Inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s long-term target; interest rates remain elevated, and many industries report difficulty finding workers while managing rising costs.

For Vermont, these national dynamics are amplified by structural challenges closer to home.

Recent economic competitiveness data place Vermont near the bottom nationally on measures including economic momentum, long term outlook, and workforce demographics. These rankings underscore the structural challenges the state must address to strengthen affordability and economic opportunity.

Demographics alone present a stark reality. Over 17,000 Vermonters are projected to retire annually this decade, while far fewer young workers are entering the labor force. To maintain economic stability, Vermont must add roughly 13,500 workers each year through population growth and workforce expansion.

At the same time, housing shortages continue to constrain that growth. The state will need tens of thousands of additional housing units to support the workforce Vermont’s economy requires.

When businesses cannot find workers, expansion stalls. When housing is unavailable or unaffordable, recruitment becomes nearly impossible. When regulatory timelines stretch into years instead of months, investment flows elsewhere.

Employers across Vermont are experiencing these pressures simultaneously.

There have been encouraging signs of progress. Conversations about health care affordability, housing infrastructure, and workforce recruitment reflect a growing recognition that Vermont’s affordability challenges are interconnected.

Vermonters are confronting rising property taxes and education costs that are intensifying the broader affordability conversation across communities. Recognizing the challenge, however, is not the same as solving it. If Vermont is serious about improving affordability and strengthening economic opportunity, several principles should guide the decisions ahead.

First, Vermont must strengthen fiscal predictability. State spending has grown significantly in recent years, placing pressure on the tax base that supports essential services. Businesses and families alike need stability and transparency in fiscal policy to make long term decisions about investment, hiring, and where to build their future.

Second, Vermont must modernize the regulatory systems that shape housing and economic development. Employers consistently report that permitting timelines and regulatory complexity increase costs and slow projects that communities need.

Third, Vermont must confront the reality of demographic change. A shrinking working age population is not a temporary challenge, but a structural shift that will shape Vermont’s economic capacity for decades. Addressing it requires coordinated strategies to recruit new residents, retain graduates, and expand housing and opportunity for the next generation of Vermonters.

These priorities reflect the areas the Vermont Chamber identified at the start of the legislative session and continue to guide our work in Montpelier as the session moves into its second half. These issues are not simply business concerns.

When businesses grow, they create jobs, support local tax bases, and sustain the services communities rely on, from schools and infrastructure to the small-town economies that define Vermont’s identity.

The Vermont Chamber of Commerce works to bring these economic realities into policy discussions every day in Montpelier. Representing employers of all sizes, industries, and regions of the state, the Chamber’s role is to ensure that the perspective of Vermont’s business community is part of the decision-making process.

Vermont has done the planning. The data is clear. The goals are defined.

The weeks ahead will determine whether Vermont translates that planning into policy and whether those policies lead to the action necessary to strengthen affordability, competitiveness, and opportunity across the state.

Vermont’s future is not predetermined. It will be shaped by the policy choices made in Montpelier in the weeks ahead.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Amy Spear

President

Fiscal Policy, Taxation, Tourism and Hospitality, Workforce Development

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of February 24, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of February 24, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Commerce Budget: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee finalized its annual budget letter to Appropriations, outlining funding priorities across housing, workforce, and economic development. Key requests include continued support for VHIP, workforce training through Advance Vermont, the International Business Office, and expanded Downtown and Village Tax Credits to spur redevelopment. Several proposals include one-time funding components, particularly within housing, workforce, rural technical assistance, and economic development initiatives.
  • Housing: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee continued work on S.328, adding accessory dwelling units to the list of uses that must be permitted under homeowners association bylaws and reviewing the bill’s broader budget implications. As housing affordability and economic growth remain closely tied to population trends, securing and sustaining funding for these initiatives will be critical as budget negotiations advance.
  • Housing Solutions: The House General and Housing Committee advanced H.775, legislation aimed at promoting more efficient housing development and strengthening access to residential health care services. The bill now moves to the House Ways and Means Committee for further consideration.
  • Yield: The House Ways and Means Committee continues to weigh how much one-time funding to use to buy down this year’s property tax increase and whether relief will be split evenly between homestead and non-homestead properties. The Vermont Chamber is advocating for fiscal responsibility and equitable treatment to avoid shifting long-term burdens onto employers.
  • Liquor Liability Insurance: The House Government Operations Committee heard testimony on language that would repeal the mandatory liquor liability insurance requirement. The proposal responds to ongoing instability in the national casualty insurance market, which has driven significant premium volatility in Vermont’s small and concentrated hospitality sector. Repeal would maintain existing civil liability and regulatory safeguards while restoring regulatory proportionality during a period of market disruption.
  • Event Ticketing: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee advanced H.512, legislation aimed at curbing excessive resale of event tickets and strengthening consumer protections for venues using online ticketing platforms. The bill now moves to the House Floor for further consideration.
  • Culinary Institute Study: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee continued work on S.327, adding a study to explore the creation of a culinary institute in Vermont. The Vermont Chamber is a named stakeholder. The proposal aligns with broader efforts to expand workforce pipelines and support long-term talent development in the restaurant and hospitality industries.
  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee reviewed draft legislation to reform Vermont’s CTE system in coordination with broader education changes. While timelines, funding, and governance structures remain in development, expanded access and improved alignment with graduation credits signal progress toward strengthening Vermont’s future workforce pipeline.
  • Family Leave: The House General and Housing Committee continued testimony on H.459, which would prohibit certain employers from counting workers’ compensation leave toward Vermont’s family and medical leave requirements. The change would require these leave systems to run sequentially rather than concurrently. Adjusting how these programs interact carries implications for job protection timelines, return-to-work planning, and staffing predictability for employers.
  • Health Care: The House Health Care Committee continued work on H.585, which proposes reforms to Vermont’s insurance structure, including allowing association health plans to provide additional coverage options for employers and self-employed Vermonters. Lawmakers are evaluating whether expanded plan flexibility could help stabilize markets and address affordability pressures.
  • Private Equity: The House Health Care Committee reviewed an updated version of H.583, which would establish a new statutory framework governing acquisitions and changes of control involving health care entities, including transactions with private equity firms. The revised bill adds additional layers of oversight, raising concerns about limiting potential solutions to Vermont’s health care challenges and increasing uncertainty for privately owned providers.
  • Land Use: The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee continued review of S.325, a bill proposing targeted updates to land use and permitting policy. The proposal would extend certain Act 250 exemption sunsets to 2030 in order to support housing development and maintain momentum on broader permitting reform timelines. The committee will continue collaborative discussions in the weeks ahead on this significant housing and development initiative.
  • Current Use: The House Environment Committee began discussion of H.70, which would include land enrolled in the Use Value Appraisal Program within the statutory definition of conserved land for purposes of the state’s conserved land inventory. The proposal could help Vermont advance its conservation goals while recognizing the importance of balanced, smart growth.
  • Rodenticides: The Vermont Chamber testified before the House Agriculture, Food Resiliency, and Forestry Committee on H.758, which would broadly ban the use of anticoagulant rodenticides commonly used by food manufacturers, restaurants, and other food-related facilities to prevent rodent infestations. The bill is expected to be amended to replace the proposed ban with a study on rodenticide alternatives.
  • Swipe Fees: The Senate Finance Committee reviewed S.135, which would prohibit credit card fees on the tax and gratuity portions of transactions and require retailers to accept cash for purchases under $500. The proposal has drawn renewed attention following a recent ruling in Illinois, though the committee signaled it will wait for further legal clarity before advancing the bill.
  • Bottle Bill: The House Environment Committee advanced H.915, proposing changes to Vermont’s beverage container redemption program. A similar version was vetoed in a prior session, and concerns remain regarding potential cost increases for the beverage industry. Significant revisions are expected as the bill moves forward.
  • Education: The House and Senate Education Committees continued discussions on education reform and district mapping, weighing mandatory consolidation against more limited voluntary models. As crossover approaches, advancing durable reform will require difficult, and potentially unpopular, decisions to ensure long-term quality, operational efficiency, and cost sustainability within Vermont’s education system.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Federal Tax Policy, Vermont Choices, and the Structure of R&D Policy

Federal Tax Policy, Vermont Choices, and the Structure of R&D Policy

The House Ways and Means Committee is considering changes to how Vermont defines taxable income for businesses that invest in research and development. Vermont companies spend millions of dollars each year on R&D across advanced manufacturing, software, biotechnology, and applied research. The tax treatment of those investments directly influences capital allocation, hiring decisions, and long-term competitiveness.

The proposal contains two interdependent components that must be evaluated together. In combination, these changes could materially shape Vermont’s innovation climate, affecting how growth-stage and capital-intensive firms evaluate future investment in the state.

What the Bill Does

The draft legislation makes two significant changes.

First, it adds back federal Section 174 deductions for research and experimental expenses. That means Vermont would not allow businesses to deduct their R&D expenses when calculating state taxable income.

Unlike other areas of the tax code, such as bonus depreciation, the draft does not restore those expenses through state level amortization. As written, R&D costs would not be deductible for Vermont tax purposes.

Second, the bill increases Vermont’s R&D tax credit from 27 percent to 75 percent of the federal R&D credit. That is a substantial increase and would make Vermont’s credit one of the most generous in the country.

These two provisions must be understood together.

What This Means in Practice

There are two primary ways states can treat R&D spending.

One approach is deductibility. Businesses subtract their R&D expenses from taxable income, just like wages, rent, or other operating costs.

Another approach is relying more heavily on tax credits, which apply only to businesses that calculate and qualify for the federal R&D credit and have sufficient tax liability to use it.

Under the existing draft, Vermont would move away from deductibility and rely more heavily on the expanded credit.

For Businesses That Claim the Federal R&D Credit

Businesses that calculate and claim the federal R&D credit would see a larger Vermont credit under the proposed 75 percent rate.

However, because the deduction would no longer be allowed, the total state tax benefit may be smaller than under a system that includes both deductibility and a credit. The outcome depends on each firm’s cost structure and federal credit calculation.

For Businesses That Incur R&D Expenses but Do Not Claim the Credit

Not all businesses that invest in R&D claim the federal credit. Some may not meet the qualification thresholds. Others may not calculate it due to complexity or cost.

Under the draft language, those businesses would lose deductibility of R&D expenses and would not receive the benefit of the credit increase. For those firms, the proposal would result in higher Vermont taxable income.

For Early Stage and Growing Firms

Firms in a loss position or early growth stage often rely on deductions to build net operating losses that can offset future income.

If R&D expenses are permanently disallowed for Vermont purposes, those costs would not be recoverable at the state level, which may affect long term planning and investment decisions.

Timing Versus Permanence

A key distinction in this debate is whether Vermont intends to delay deductibility or eliminate it.

If Vermont required R&D expenses to be amortized over several years, businesses would still recover their costs over time. That is a timing adjustment.

Under the existing draft, there is no amortization restoration. As written, the policy would permanently disallow deduction of R&D expenses at the state level.

That structural difference has meaningful economic implications.

Where the Opportunity and the Risk Sit

The increase to a 75 percent R&D credit is significant. If structured correctly, it could position Vermont as a strong competitor for innovation-based investment.

The risk lies in how the deduction and credit interact. If the credit expansion is paired with preserved cost recovery, the proposal could strengthen Vermont’s competitiveness while maintaining revenue balance. If deductibility is permanently removed, the policy becomes more uneven. Some firms would benefit from the higher credit. Others would see a durable increase in state taxable income.

The Bottom Line

This proposal is not simply about increasing a tax credit. It is about how Vermont defines taxable income for businesses that invest in research and development. Understanding whether the policy preserves deductibility or permanently eliminates it is essential to evaluating its impact.

The Vermont Chamber will continue to work with lawmakers to ensure that tax policy advances affordability, predictability, and long-term competitiveness while avoiding unintended consequences for the businesses that power Vermont’s economy.

CONNECT WITH OUR TAX EXPERT

Amy Spear

President

Fiscal Policy, Taxation, Tourism and Hospitality, Workforce Development

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of February 17, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of February 17, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Commerce Budget Letter: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee reviewed annual budget requests from statewide agencies and economic development organizations in preparation for sending their annual budget request letter to the House Appropriations committee. Continued focus on investing in economic development tools and programs that will move Vermont toward greater economic growth and competition remains vital for correcting structural issues facing the Vermont economy.
  • Vermont Adjutant General: Deputy Adjutant General Henry Harder was elected as the new Adjutant General of the Vermont National Guard by a Caucus of the Whole. He succeeds retiring 2025 Citizen of the Year Adjutant General Knight, who served eight years in the role and built meaningful relationships and trust between the Vermont National Guard, the legislators, and the broader public. The Vermont Chamber extends its gratitude to General Knight for his dedicated leadership and for 43 years of distinguished service to our nation.
  • Health Care Costs: The Senate Health and Welfare Committee heard testimony from the Green Mountain Care Board, which is advocating that hospital savings be targeted to specifically reduce costs for those in the state’s qualified health plans. The consequences could be significant for employers in the self-insured and large group market, the latter of which already saw an average 15% increase this year.
  • Budget Adjustment: The House took up H.790, , the budget adjustment bill that makes midyear changes to the FY ’26 state budget. The House and Senate Appropriations committees will now meet for a committee of conference to find compromise between the House and Senate versions of the bill.
  • Housing Construction: The House General and Housing committee continued discussions on H.775, refining provisions that would direct the Treasurer’s office to support financing for off-site modular homes and authorize the Vermont Housing Finance Agency authority to assist in funding long-term care facilities construction. These initiatives could promote more efficient housing development and strengthen access to residential healthcare services.
  • Housing Development: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee continued work on S.328, reviewing funding incentives for high-density housing built with union labor and a provision prohibiting common interest communities from banning long-term rentals. While expanding rental markets is a meaningful step toward increasing housing supply, a union incentive could exclude smaller businesses and rural areas with lower union representation.
  • Career and Technical Education (CTE): The Senate Education committee continued review of S.313, discussing governance models, expanded access, aligned graduation credits, and integration of adult education programs. A collaborative approach between legislators, CTEs and the Administration will be essential to modernizing CTE and strengthening its role in Vermont’s education and workforce development.
  • Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy: The Vermont Chamber gave testimony to the Senate Finance committee on S.138, a bill proposing to expand the PACE program to include commercial and industrial buildings. The PACE program expansion would allow business owners to finance energy improvements and repay the cost over time through a special assessment on their property tax bill.
  • Redistricting: The House and Senate Education committees continued discussion on potential redistricting of Vermont’s education system. With regional models, voluntary merging, and draft map proposals all still under debate after seven weeks of work, substantive proposals and decisions must soon be made to continue on the path toward education reform and cost-saving measures.
  • Efficiency Standards: The House Energy and Digital Infrastructure committee continued work on H.718, making significant progress toward a balanced, incremental approach to establishing reliable and predictable residential building code standards. The bill now includes safe harbor language to protect builders and preempt liability arising from the Governor’s Executive Order allowing use of 2020 Residential Building Energy Standards.
  • Cannabis Event Permits: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs and the House Government Operations and Military Affairs committees heard testimony in a joint hearing on S.278, which proposes significant changes to cannabis laws, including a pilot program for cannabis events licenses modeled after alcohol events permits. As work continues, potential insurance and liability burdens for venues where cannabis consumption may be allowed must be considered.
  • Miscellaneous Tax Bill: The House Ways and Means Committee continued work on a committee bill making targeted administrative and policy updates to Vermont’s tax laws. The draft includes several provisions employers should be aware of: repeal of the denial of credits for taxes paid in another state by S corporations, which restores more equitable treatment for pass-through businesses; an increase in the Down Payment Assistance Program credit cap to reflect rising housing costs and support workforce housing access; and an increase in the estate tax filing threshold, which may reduce tax exposure for family-owned businesses and succession planning. Additional technical updates address property transfer tax, current use administration, and grand list timelines. This bill is expected to serve as the primary vehicle for potential federal tax conformity updates this session. Those conformity provisions are not yet included, and it remains unclear where they will ultimately land. The Vermont Chamber continues to advocate for thoughtful conformity to support business investment, modernization, and long-term competitiveness.
  • Net Metering: The House Energy and Digital Infrastructure continued work on H.716, a bill revising net metering credits. After stakeholder input and language review, the committee removed a harmful clause that would have capped the negative adjustor for net-metered energy, avoiding potential cost shifts onto non-net-metered ratepayers.
  • Economic Development: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs continued work on S.327, eliminating the Business Development Task Force and assigning further responsibilities to the Agency of Commerce and Economic Development. While efficiency and continued focus on developing economic competitiveness remain priorities, continued stakeholder engagement will be vital for ensuring a thorough review of challenges and opportunities facing Vermont businesses.
  • Tax Classifications: The House Ways and Means Committee continued work on expanding property tax classifications from two to three categories. Discussion included categorizing short- term rentals in apartment buildings, misclassification penalties, and potential impacts of seasonal workforce housing being included in the same tax classification as second homes and short-term rentals, creating a potential barrier for visiting workers.
  • Liquor Liability: The Vermont Chamber testified before the House Government Operations and Military Affairs Committee in support of repealing the mandatory liquor liability insurance requirement. Removing this mandate would eliminate a significant cost burden for businesses while preserving existing accountability standards.
  • Streamlined Housing Development: The Senate Natural Resources and Energy and Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committees reviewed persistent bottlenecks to housing development, focusing on infrastructure, zoning, and permitting delays. Legislators continue consideration of advancing legislation around pre-approved housing designs, an initiative that could cut build times, reduce permitting delays, and slash housing costs if implemented.
  • Convention Center Feasibility: The Vermont Chamber is serving on a statewide task force evaluating the feasibility of a convention center and performance venue in Vermont, and in this week’s meeting examined potential governance and funding models used for building and maintenance. While public-private partnerships and other funding mechanisms were discussed, evidence pointed to additional burdens of state or local funding being necessary for any project to pencil out. Email us to learn more.
  • US Supreme Court Tariff Ruling: The U.S. Supreme Court struck down sweeping tariffs set by President Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, ruling they exceeded constitutional authority. While the decision did not directly address refunds for businesses that paid the tariffs, further guidance or mechanisms for potential reimbursement may emerge.
  • Senate Pro-Tempore Retirement: Senate Pro Tempore Phil Baruth announced on the Senate floor that he will retire at the end of the session and will not endorse a successor. With significant time remaining in the session, the announcement is likely to spark early leadership positioning and introduce new dynamics into the legislative process.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of February 10, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of February 10, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

Retail Delivery Fee: The House Transportation committee introduced H.863, a bill that would impose a fee of $0.30 on all retail deliveries. The proposal would raise burdensome and costly new administrative and compliance requirements on Vermont businesses that operate direct-to- consumer services.

Local Option Gas Tax: The Senate Transportation Committee reviewed language allowing municipalities to impose an additional 1 percent local option tax on sales, meals and rooms, or alcohol, with much of the revenue retained by the state for the Transportation Fund. While a long term transportation funding solution is needed, this approach could raise costs for businesses in the visitor economy without resolving the underlying structural challenges.

Tax Credit Opt Out: The House Ways and Means committee discussed opting out of a $1,700 federal tax credit for contributions to scholarship organizations that help pay education expenses for elementary and secondary students. Choosing to forgo this no-cost federal incentive could shut the door on an additional funding mechanism for Vermont’s education system

Income Tax Brackets: The House Ways and Means committee introduced H.732, a bill that would add new income tax brackets at the $200,000 and $400,000 income levels to generate additional revenue for the education fund. Reliance on additional and volatile income taxes to address structural spending problems will not address the underlying affordability crisis facing Vermont, the third most taxed state in the nation.

Tax Classifications: The House Ways and Means Committee continued work on expanding property tax classifications from two to three categories, including discussion of defining employer-provided housing as a nonmonetary employment benefit and limiting property attestation forms to properties with fewer than five dwellings. The committee chair signaled that additional testimony will be taken next week as lawmakers continue to evaluate the structure and potential impacts of the proposal.

Budget Adjustment: The Senate advanced H.790, the budget adjustment bill that makes midyear changes to the FY ’26 state budget. The committee largely concurred with the House proposal to carry surplus funds into the FY ’27 budget for potential use in a property tax buydown once the broader budget outlook takes shape. The bill now moves to the House Floor for further consideration.

Cannabis Event Permitting: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee reviewed S.278, a bill that would authorize general event permits for cannabis sales, with limited hours, access-controlled spaces, licensed entity applications, and municipal approval requirements similar to alcohol event permits. With significant implications for venues statewide, careful consideration will be needed before advancing this broad expansion of cannabis use.

Public Safety: The House and Senate Judiciary Committees held a joint hearing on the Chittenden County Accessibility Court pilot, launched in response to record case backlogs. The pilot has resolved over 700 pending cases and will continue at a scaled-back level, with testimony also noting that long-term success in reducing court volume will depend in part on addressing underlying housing instability.

Economic Development: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee continued review of S.327, emphasizing the need to improve communication of business resources and clarify Vermont’s branding initiatives. As discussion continues around requiring an administrative report before establishing a Business Development Task Force, it remains important to consider the strong impact a task force working in tandem with this report could have on creating accessible and competitive economic environments.

Alcohol: The House Government Operations and Military Affairs committee continued testimony on an omnibus alcohol bill, hearing overwhelming support from the alcohol industry on improvements the bill would make to distribution allowances, services in farmers markets, consumption levels permitted in tasting rooms and retail shops, and permitting and hours of service for off-site tasting events.

Health Care Recruitment: The Senate Health and Welfare committee reviewed S.142, a bill creating a pathway to licensure for internationally trained medical professionals. With strong stakeholder support, the proposal would help address workforce shortages and strengthen Vermont’s ability to attract and retain skilled healthcare providers.

Health Care: The Senate Health and Welfare committee continued work on S.190, a bill that would put outsourced hospital services under the Green Mountain Care Board’s budget-setting authority and require hospitals to compare their posted pricing to Medicare in preparation of reference-based pricing. These changes aim to continue momentum of cost containment efforts.

Vermont Housing Improvement Program (VHIP): The House General and Housing committee reviewed the VHIP program, which helps property owners bring vacant or code-deficient housing back online in an affordable manner. Without a base funding allocation as requested by the Administration, the future of one of the state’s most effective housing development programs remains uncertain

Agency of Commerce and Community Development (ACCD) Budget: The House Commerce and Economic Development and House Appropriations committees heard testimony on ACCD’s budget proposal, including much-needed funding for the Manufactured Home Improvement Program, International Business Development Office, and a request for base funding to VHIP. No additional funding was requested by the Department of Tourism and Marketing or for economic development programs though investments in both of these areas have returns that help grow the economy.

Net Metering: The House Energy and Digital Infrastructure committee reviewed H.717, a bill that would cap or eliminate the negative adjustor for net-metered energy. If enacted, the proposal could shift additional costs onto non-net-metered ratepayers and disrupt the Public Utility Commission’s established process for regularly updating adjustors based on competitive market prices.

Plastics Prohibitions: The Senate Natural Resources and Energy committee continued testimony on S.247, a bill that would prohibit advanced recycling and chemical conversion technologies and restrict certain materials used in medical equipment. These provisions could add cost pressures to an already strained healthcare system and place the state out of alignment with others pursuing innovative waste management solutions.

Noncompete: The House Commerce and Economic Development continued work on H.205, bill that would ban non-competes and restricts an employer’s use of retention incentive agreements. The bill continues to take shape into a more workable proposal, with legislators including flexibility, reflecting testimony from impacted employers, and continuing work to remove any unintended consequences.

 

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Federal Tax Policy, Vermont Choices, and the Opportunity to Support Vermont Businesses

Federal Tax Policy, Vermont Choices, and the Opportunity to Support Vermont Businesses

Lawmakers on the House Ways and Means Committee confronted a reality that Vermont businesses are already living with. Federal tax changes and trade disruptions are creating uncertainty that businesses cannot control, while Vermont’s selective conformity framework puts state policymakers in a position to either reduce that strain or add to it. As federal pressures build, the conformity debate this session is less about following Washington and more about how Vermont chooses to support its own economy.

Federal tax changes are rarely neutral for states. Vermont does not conform automatically to the federal tax code. Changes that affect the calculation of federal taxable income generally flow through unless the state explicitly decouples, while provisions that occur below the line or are structured differently often require affirmative legislative action. As a result, conformity decisions are not passive. They are deliberate policy choices that shape whether Vermont’s tax system reflects current economic conditions or introduces added cost and complexity for employers already navigating uncertainty.

In periods of stability, these decisions matter. In periods of disruption, they matter more.

What Federal Conformity Means for Vermont Businesses

To ground the discussion in real world application, the Committee heard detailed testimony from Mike Hackett, Partner and Tax Practice Leader at Gallagher Flynn and Company. Hackett walked lawmakers through how key provisions of H.R. 1 operate across business types and why conformity decisions have tangible consequences for Vermont employers.

He emphasized that when Vermont decouples from federal tax treatment, the impact is not abstract. It shows up as additional calculations, higher professional fees, and increased compliance complexity for businesses simply trying to follow the law. In an already challenging operating environment, that added friction can influence whether businesses invest, expand, or delay decisions.

From there, the testimony focused on several provisions with broad relevance across Vermont’s economy.

Research and Experimental Expenditures

One of the most significant provisions discussed was the restoration of current deductibility for domestic research and development expenses. Hackett explained that prior capitalization requirements created a disconnect between taxable income and actual business economics, forcing companies to pay tax on income they never truly realized.

These impacts extend well beyond traditional research-intensive industries. Vermont employers rely on R&D spending for process improvements, engineering, compliance driven innovation, and product development across manufacturing, construction, software, and research driven fields. Allowing these costs to be deducted when incurred improves cash flow and supports reinvestment at a time when margins are under pressure.

Business Interest Deductions

H.R. 1 also restores the calculation of interest deduction limits to a framework used prior to 2022. Vermont has historically conformed to this approach. Hackett noted that decoupling here would be a meaningful departure for the state, immediately limiting businesses’ ability to deduct ordinary financing costs while also requiring separate state and federal calculations.

In an environment of higher interest rates and rising capital costs, interest deductibility directly affects access to capital and the feasibility of investment across sectors. Maintaining alignment here helps avoid layering additional cost and complexity onto routine business financing decisions.

Expensing of Depreciable Business Assets

Updates to federal expensing limits, particularly under Section 179, reflect inflation and rising equipment costs. Vermont already conforms to these rules. Hackett cautioned that failing to update conformity would leave outdated thresholds in place while prices continue to rise, requiring businesses to track separate depreciation systems without changing behavior in a productive way.

Enhanced expensing provisions support investment in the physical backbone of Vermont’s economy, including manufacturing equipment, construction machinery, agricultural assets, technology systems, and hospitality infrastructure.

An Unintended Small Business Consequence

Hackett also highlighted a technical but important issue affecting small businesses that amended federal returns related to prior R&D capitalization rules. Without state action, some Vermont businesses could permanently lose the ability to deduct legitimate expenses for Vermont tax purposes. Those dollars were spent, but the deductions disappear under current state law.

This outcome was never intended by federal policy and disproportionately affects small employers managing tight cash flow, underscoring how technical conformity decisions can have very real consequences.

Conformity as a Vermont Decision

What emerged clearly from the hearing is that conformity is not an endorsement of federal policy. It is a Vermont decision about how much friction the state is willing to layer onto businesses already absorbing external shocks.

When federal actions introduce volatility, state policy choices can either amplify that uncertainty or help stabilize operations. In this context, conforming to key federal provisions can reduce compliance costs, improve predictability, and support continued investment in Vermont’s economy.

The Bottom Line

This week’s testimony underscored that Vermont’s tax decisions this session will be shaped less by ideology and more by whether the state uses the tools it controls to respond to forces it does not.

Federal policy may be driving uncertainty, but Vermont has choices. Conformity decisions that prioritize predictability, simplicity, and investment give businesses the clarity they need to navigate disruption and continue contributing to Vermont’s economy.

The Vermont Chamber will continue to engage lawmakers with data-informed analysis and real-world context to ensure tax policy supports affordability, predictability, and long-term economic resilience for businesses across the state.

CONNECT WITH OUR TAX EXPERT

Amy Spear

President

Fiscal Policy, Taxation, Tourism and Hospitality, Workforce Development

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of February 3, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of February 3, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Redistricting Map: After a year of contentious debate over the future of Vermont’s education system, the House Education Committee chair released a proposed redistricting map to move the conversation from theory to a more tangible framework for discussion. Framed explicitly as a starting point, the map sets the stage for stakeholder feedback and upcoming testimony, with key questions around governance, cost pressures, local control, and implementation.
  • Omnibus Housing Bill: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee continued review of S.328, working to ensure that town housing goals continue to integrate with statewide development targets and continuing to develop an off-site housing construction pilot program that could make it easier to create new housing statewide
  • Rural Housing: The House General and Housing Committee continued work on H.775, a multifaceted housing production bill focused on incentivizing small-scale rural development by unlocking new financing tools and reducing barriers for small developers. Committee discussion explored the proposal of an off-site housing construction accelerator pilot program that could lead to more efficient, timely, and consistent home creation.
  • Land Use Permitting: The House Environment committee introduced H.805, a bill that would allow Agency of Natural Resources-certified engineers to help streamline wetland and stormwater permitting for projects with minor impacts. Modeled after existing wastewater exemptions, the proposal could improve permitting efficiency.
  • Omnibus Alcohol Bill: The House Government Operations and Military Affairs committee combined four alcohol-related bills into a single omnibus alcohol bill that would improve operations for alcohol suppliers by increasing distribution allowances, allowing services in farmers markets, increasing consumption permitted in tasting rooms and retail shops, and improving permitting and hours of service for off-site tasting events.
  • Vermont Employment Growth Initiative (VEGI): The Senate Finance and Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committees continued review of S.225 and S.327, which would remove the sunset of the VEGI program and preserve access to this key economic development tool.
  • Outdoor Recreation Day: On Outdoor Recreation Day, committees heard testimony on the outdoor recreation industry’s $2.1 billion contribution to Vermont’s GDP and its support of over 16,000 jobs.
  • Health Care: The House Health Care committee continued testimony on H.585, a bill proposing broad reforms to health insurance structures, including the permitting of association health care plans to provide additional choices for employers and self-employed Vermonters. Continued introduction of tools like these remains critical to stabilizing Vermont’s volatile insurance markets and improving affordability for ratepayers.
  • Prescription Drugs: The House Health Care committee received updates on legislation passed last session to cap prices on certain prescription drugs to make health care more affordable. The committee also discussed strategies to pool purchasing power and reduce drug costs to help curb systemically high healthcare expenses.  
  • Budget Adjustment: The Senate Appropriations committee reviewed H.790, the House-passed budget adjustment bill, which makes midyear changes to the FY ’26 state budget. The committee concurred with the House proposal to carry surplus funds into the FY ’27 budget for potential use in a property tax buydown once the broader budget outlook takes shape.
  • Education Spending: The Senate Finance committee continued work on S.220, a bill that would align education spending growth with inflation while implementation of education reform takes shape. While recent compromises in the bill allow for more flexibility in extreme circumstances, it remains unclear if the bill will move beyond this committee as debate continues.
  • Rodenticides: The House Agriculture, Food Resiliency, and Forestry committee reviewed H.758, a bill that would completely ban the use of rodenticides outside lengthy and narrow waiver procedures for applicators in cases of agricultural, environmental, or public health emergencies. Such a ban could significantly affect facilities management, food safety, and operational costs for businesses across sectors, particularly those in food service, hospitality, and manufacturing.
  • Tax Classifications: The House Ways and Means committee continued work on the expansion of property tax classifications from two to three, determining property taxation will be based on percentage of property use within in each category. Significant challenges remain, including the verification of property use attestations, administration and collection of forms, and the cost of implementation.
  • Leave Policy (H.459): House General and Housing Committee discussed a policy proposal to stop workers’ compensation leave from running concurrently with Parental and Family Leave. Committee members raised concerns about employer costs, particularly for smaller or benefit-rich employers, and questioned whether the bill was overly burdensome. The committee agreed to have the bill drafted with an employer size threshold for further discussion.
  • Flexible Working Arrangements: The Vermont Chamber of Commerce testified before the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee on S.230, a bill that would shift the onus to employers to prove that flexible working arrangements are unworkable. Vermont has one of the most extensive flexible working arrangement laws in the country and this is a solution in search of a problem.
  • Non-Compete: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee continued work on H.205, a bill that would broadly ban non-competes and restricts an employer’s use of retention incentive agreements. The bill continues to be shaped into a more workable proposal.
  • Franchises: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee continued work on H.733, a bill that would significantly expand state regulation of business-to-business franchise relationships by limiting termination and renewal rights and imposing mandatory inventory repurchase and transfer requirements. The proposal raises serious concerns about government intrusion into private contracts, added compliance costs, and potential impacts on franchise investment and expansion in Vermont.
  • Mediators: The House General and Housing committees advanced H.548, a bill that would create a new state position offering mediation services to both public and private sector businesses and their employees’ collective bargaining units. The bill now moves to the House Floor for consideration
  • Career Technical Education (CTE): The Senate Education committee heard testimony on risks of applying broad reform to a diverse system of CTE centers while also considering the complexities of creating real solutions to the problems facing CTE centers. Ensuring CTE centers are properly funded, accessible to students, and integrated with broader education reform remains vital for developing Vermont’s future workforce.
  • Event Ticketing: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee continued testimony on H.512, a bill aimed at curbing resale of event tickets to improve event attendance and strengthen protections for venues using online ticketing platforms. Questions remain around potential impacts on face-value reselling platforms and possible exceptions for venue-reseller partnerships
  • Purchase and Use: The House Ways and Means Committee reviewed the Governor’s proposal to shift the remaining one-third of vehicle purchase and use tax revenue from the Education Fund to the Transportation Fund over the next three years. This transition is important to meet federal match and road maintenance requirements.
  • Meals and Rooms: The Senate Finance Committee reviewed S.286, a bill proposing a 2 percent increase to the rooms and meals tax and further raising costs for businesses in the visitor economy. During review, the committee chair emphasized that significant testimony from impacted industries will be needed.

 

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS