Politics Over Process: Vermont Voices Left Out of the Data Privacy Debate

Politics Over Process: Vermont Voices Left Out of the Data Privacy Debate

A joint data privacy hearing was billed as an opportunity for legislators to deepen their understanding of digital privacy systems. Instead, it highlighted a concerning dynamic in the legislative process, one that framed business as the problem while excluding local perspectives that are central to Vermont’s economy.

The hearing, convened by a member of the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee and attended by members of that and the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee, featured testimony from a narrow and interconnected set of national privacy advocates. Despite being described as an educational session, the hearing did not include testimony from any Vermont based businesses, nonprofits, healthcare providers, or financial institutions. These are the very organizations responsible for implementing and complying with any changes to state law.

National experts play an important role in policy discussions and bring valuable insight from across jurisdictions. However, education requires exposure to competing viewpoints, real-world implementation experience, and an honest discussion of tradeoffs. That balance is especially important in complex areas like data privacy, where policy design has real operational, legal, and economic consequences. Those elements were largely absent from this hearing.

Instead, testimony repeatedly portrayed businesses as inherently untrustworthy and incapable of responsible data stewardship without aggressive regulatory and litigious driven intervention. Several speakers argued that companies could not be relied upon to protect personal information and that sweeping restrictions and enforcement mechanisms were necessary to prevent harm. Concerns about compliance costs and operational burden were minimized or dismissed, even as legislators raised questions about the impact on small businesses in a rural state like Vermont.

The imbalance was further underscored by what was missing from the discussion. There are respected academics who study how comprehensive privacy laws are functioning in other states and who raise concerns about the economic consequences of a growing and inconsistent patchwork of state-by-state privacy regimes. There are also national experts with deep experience in sectors already governed by extensive data privacy laws, including healthcare and financial services, who could provide insight into how strong enforceable privacy protections operate in practice. None of these perspectives were included.

Vermont business organizations have consistently supported strong, comprehensive data privacy protections. Support has been expressed for the balanced bipartisan data privacy bill that passed the Vermont Senate unanimously last year and, because Vermont operates on a biennium, remains under consideration this session. That legislation would provide Vermonters with robust consumer protections while remaining workable for employers, nonprofits, healthcare providers, and financial institutions operating in a digital economy.

At a time when Vermont continues to face affordability pressures, workforce shortages, and challenges building economic momentum, process matters. Policy development is most effective when it includes the people and organizations responsible for implementation alongside national expertise. A hearing dominated by a single advocacy perspective does not meet that standard.

Vermont stakeholders remain engaged and prepared to participate in a more balanced and inclusive process. Strong data privacy policy will succeed only if it reflects a full range of perspectives and builds on the bipartisan work already before the Legislature.

CONNECT WITH OUR DATA PRIVACY EXPERT

Megan Sullivan

Vice President of Government Affairs

Economic Development, Fiscal Policy, Healthcare, Housing, Land Use/Permitting, Technology

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of February 3, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of February 3, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Redistricting Map: After a year of contentious debate over the future of Vermont’s education system, the House Education Committee chair released a proposed redistricting map to move the conversation from theory to a more tangible framework for discussion. Framed explicitly as a starting point, the map sets the stage for stakeholder feedback and upcoming testimony, with key questions around governance, cost pressures, local control, and implementation.
  • Omnibus Housing Bill: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee continued review of S.328, working to ensure that town housing goals continue to integrate with statewide development targets and continuing to develop an off-site housing construction pilot program that could make it easier to create new housing statewide
  • Rural Housing: The House General and Housing Committee continued work on H.775, a multifaceted housing production bill focused on incentivizing small-scale rural development by unlocking new financing tools and reducing barriers for small developers. Committee discussion explored the proposal of an off-site housing construction accelerator pilot program that could lead to more efficient, timely, and consistent home creation.
  • Land Use Permitting: The House Environment committee introduced H.805, a bill that would allow Agency of Natural Resources-certified engineers to help streamline wetland and stormwater permitting for projects with minor impacts. Modeled after existing wastewater exemptions, the proposal could improve permitting efficiency.
  • Omnibus Alcohol Bill: The House Government Operations and Military Affairs committee combined four alcohol-related bills into a single omnibus alcohol bill that would improve operations for alcohol suppliers by increasing distribution allowances, allowing services in farmers markets, increasing consumption permitted in tasting rooms and retail shops, and improving permitting and hours of service for off-site tasting events.
  • Vermont Employment Growth Initiative (VEGI): The Senate Finance and Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committees continued review of S.225 and S.327, which would remove the sunset of the VEGI program and preserve access to this key economic development tool.
  • Outdoor Recreation Day: On Outdoor Recreation Day, committees heard testimony on the outdoor recreation industry’s $2.1 billion contribution to Vermont’s GDP and its support of over 16,000 jobs.
  • Health Care: The House Health Care committee continued testimony on H.585, a bill proposing broad reforms to health insurance structures, including the permitting of association health care plans to provide additional choices for employers and self-employed Vermonters. Continued introduction of tools like these remains critical to stabilizing Vermont’s volatile insurance markets and improving affordability for ratepayers.
  • Prescription Drugs: The House Health Care committee received updates on legislation passed last session to cap prices on certain prescription drugs to make health care more affordable. The committee also discussed strategies to pool purchasing power and reduce drug costs to help curb systemically high healthcare expenses.  
  • Budget Adjustment: The Senate Appropriations committee reviewed H.790, the House-passed budget adjustment bill, which makes midyear changes to the FY ’26 state budget. The committee concurred with the House proposal to carry surplus funds into the FY ’27 budget for potential use in a property tax buydown once the broader budget outlook takes shape.
  • Education Spending: The Senate Finance committee continued work on S.220, a bill that would align education spending growth with inflation while implementation of education reform takes shape. While recent compromises in the bill allow for more flexibility in extreme circumstances, it remains unclear if the bill will move beyond this committee as debate continues.
  • Rodenticides: The House Agriculture, Food Resiliency, and Forestry committee reviewed H.758, a bill that would completely ban the use of rodenticides outside lengthy and narrow waiver procedures for applicators in cases of agricultural, environmental, or public health emergencies. Such a ban could significantly affect facilities management, food safety, and operational costs for businesses across sectors, particularly those in food service, hospitality, and manufacturing.
  • Tax Classifications: The House Ways and Means committee continued work on the expansion of property tax classifications from two to three, determining property taxation will be based on percentage of property use within in each category. Significant challenges remain, including the verification of property use attestations, administration and collection of forms, and the cost of implementation.
  • Leave Policy (H.459): House General and Housing Committee discussed a policy proposal to stop workers’ compensation leave from running concurrently with Parental and Family Leave. Committee members raised concerns about employer costs, particularly for smaller or benefit-rich employers, and questioned whether the bill was overly burdensome. The committee agreed to have the bill drafted with an employer size threshold for further discussion.
  • Flexible Working Arrangements: The Vermont Chamber of Commerce testified before the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee on S.230, a bill that would shift the onus to employers to prove that flexible working arrangements are unworkable. Vermont has one of the most extensive flexible working arrangement laws in the country and this is a solution in search of a problem.
  • Non-Compete: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee continued work on H.205, a bill that would broadly ban non-competes and restricts an employer’s use of retention incentive agreements. The bill continues to be shaped into a more workable proposal.
  • Franchises: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee continued work on H.733, a bill that would significantly expand state regulation of business-to-business franchise relationships by limiting termination and renewal rights and imposing mandatory inventory repurchase and transfer requirements. The proposal raises serious concerns about government intrusion into private contracts, added compliance costs, and potential impacts on franchise investment and expansion in Vermont.
  • Mediators: The House General and Housing committees advanced H.548, a bill that would create a new state position offering mediation services to both public and private sector businesses and their employees’ collective bargaining units. The bill now moves to the House Floor for consideration
  • Career Technical Education (CTE): The Senate Education committee heard testimony on risks of applying broad reform to a diverse system of CTE centers while also considering the complexities of creating real solutions to the problems facing CTE centers. Ensuring CTE centers are properly funded, accessible to students, and integrated with broader education reform remains vital for developing Vermont’s future workforce.
  • Event Ticketing: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee continued testimony on H.512, a bill aimed at curbing resale of event tickets to improve event attendance and strengthen protections for venues using online ticketing platforms. Questions remain around potential impacts on face-value reselling platforms and possible exceptions for venue-reseller partnerships
  • Purchase and Use: The House Ways and Means Committee reviewed the Governor’s proposal to shift the remaining one-third of vehicle purchase and use tax revenue from the Education Fund to the Transportation Fund over the next three years. This transition is important to meet federal match and road maintenance requirements.
  • Meals and Rooms: The Senate Finance Committee reviewed S.286, a bill proposing a 2 percent increase to the rooms and meals tax and further raising costs for businesses in the visitor economy. During review, the committee chair emphasized that significant testimony from impacted industries will be needed.

 

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of January 27, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of January 27, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Omnibus Housing Bill Advances: The Senate Economic Development Committee advanced a comprehensive housing bill that takes important steps to increase housing supply by strengthening municipal housing planning requirements and modernizing zoning to allow more duplexes and small multi-unit homes where infrastructure exists. As the bill moves forward, the Chamber will focus on ensuring that new labor incentives, rent regulations, and added requirements do not unintentionally drive-up construction costs or slow the pace of housing production needed for Vermont’s workforce.
  • Rural Housing: The House General and Housing Committee reviewed H.775, a multifaceted housing production bill focused on incentivizing small-scale rural development by unlocking new financing tools and reducing barriers for small developers. Committee discussion explored governance and financing mechanics, accessibility considerations, and how these tools could support housing production across rural communities.
  • Recycling and Material Innovation Ban (S.247): The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee reviewed provisions of S.247 that would prohibit advanced recycling and chemical conversion technologies, effectively closing the door on emerging recycling innovation and related investment in Vermont. This type of blanket ban sends an anti-business signal that puts Vermont out of step with states pursuing circular economy solutions and modern waste management strategies.
  • Health Care Supply Impacts (S.247): Separate sections of S.247 also include restrictions on materials used in medical tubing and solution containers that could increase costs and limit supply options for health care providers. These changes risk adding pressure to an already strained health care system, with downstream cost impacts for employers and patients.
  • Land Use and Housing: The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee held multiple hearings this week to understand the state of the housing discussion and its intersection with land use, including updates on mapping, Act 181, and the community housing investment program.
  • Budget Adjustment: The House advanced H.790, a bill making adjustments to the FY ’26 budget. While the Governor proposed using surplus funds to immediately buy down projected property tax increases, the House version would carry the funds into the FY ’27 budget for potential use in a buydown or for other priorities. The bill now moves to the Senate for consideration.
  • Yield Bill: The House Ways and Means Committee reviewed projected FY ’27 property tax rates but will wait to set rates until school budgets are finalized. With a funding gap exceeding $100 million, a combination of buydowns and rate increases is expected, directly impacting employers and affecting economic predictability as runaway costs continue.
  • Alcohol: House Government Operations committee took testimony on H.672, H.655, H.647, and a committee bill, a flight of alcohol-related legislation that would expand permissions for sale, total distribution, and number of establishments allowed in the alcoholic beverages industry. These changes could streamline the sale and distribution of alcohol for licensees.
  • District Consolidation: The House Education committee continued reviewing school district consolidation as a strategy to reduce education costs. Despite earlier legislative goals to adopt a new district map by the end of the month, delays indicate a continued lag in policy committees to adopt key cost-saving measures.
  • Mileage-Based User Fee: The Senate Transportation committee continued testimony on implementation of a mileage-based user fee for electric vehicles, putting forward a system that would charge EV owners based on odometer readings. While this change would help recoup some revenue for the flagging Transportation Fund, additional action will be needed to ensure Vermont’s roads remain adequately funded and maintained.
  • Dental Workforce Development: The House Government Operations and Military Affairs committee heard testimony on H.588,  a bill that would create a temporary license for visiting dental students. This licensure update could help expand Vermont’s dental workforce by making it easier for students to practice, certify, and remain in the state.
  • Tax Classifications: The House Ways and Means committee continued work on the expansion of property tax classifications from two to three. Many challenges still need to be addressed, including the verification of property use attestation forms, administration and collection of forms, and the cost of implementation. Dwelling and employee housing definitions also remain in flux.
  • Career Technical Education (CTE): The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee reviewed S.313, a bill outlining goals to align CTE with workforce needs, expand access, reduce barriers, and better integrate CTE courses with graduation requirements. While the bill marks a strong start to CTE reform discussions, continued focus is needed to ensure students have the opportunity build skills necessary to meet the needs of Vermont employers.
  • Event Ticketing: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee reviewed an updated version of H.512, a bill aimed at curbing the resale of event tickets. If advanced, the bill could improve event attendance and strengthen protections for venues using online ticketing platforms.
  • Energy Codes: The House Energy and Digital Infrastructure Committee continued testimony on H.718, a bill that would push enforcement of existing residential and commercial building energy codes, require new disclosures and training for contractors, and allow municipalities to enforce energy codes alongside the state. If advanced, this bill could add regulatory layers and administrative complexity, a move that directly conflicts with the urgent housing crisis.
  • Flexible Working Arrangements: The House General and Housing Committee introduced H.726, a bill that would require employers to grant employee requests for flexible working arrangements, shifting the onus to businesses to prove these arrangements would not work.
  • Non-Compete: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee took up testimony on H.205, a bill that would broadly ban non-competes and restricts an employer’s use of retention incentive agreements. While some improvements have been made as a result of the Non-Compete Agreements Study Committee report released this past fall, additional changes are needed to make the bill balanced and workable.
  • Franchise Agreements: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee reviewed H.733, a bill that would significantly expand state regulation of business-to-business franchise relationships by limiting termination and renewal rights and imposing mandatory inventory repurchase and transfer requirements. The proposal raises serious concerns about government intrusion into private contracts, added compliance costs, and potential impacts on franchise investment and expansion in Vermont.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of January 20, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of January 20, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Workforce Strategy: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee heard testimony from the Office of Workforce Strategy and Development on efforts to support business expansion, increase retention of college graduates, and grow Vermont’s workforce throughout sectors struggling to recruit. Building upon this work remains critical to addressing improving affordability and ensuring that employers have the workforce needed to remain competitive. 
  • Housing Development: The Vermont Chamber testified before the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee, advocating practical housing policies that reduce regulatory burdens and streamline development. Ensuring the legislature continues its focus on tackling Vermont’s housing shortage remains critical to supporting workforce recruitment, business growth, and long-term economic competitiveness  
  • Drifting Priorities: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee introduced nine new bills this week, many centered on data privacy regulations. As businesses face mounting challenges, it is critical that the committees prioritize proposals that aim to grow economic development and workforce opportunities to support Vermont’s long-term affordability and competitiveness.  
  • Bottle Bill: The House Environment Committee reviewed a bill that would rewrite the state’s beverage container redemption law, setting aspirational targets for redemption rates. The bill also includes potential increased fees for manufacturers to support the expanded system. 
  • Workforce Training: The Senate Education Committee heard testimony from the Vermont Student Assistance Corporation on workforce training programs available to support employee development. These programs offer businesses valuable tools to upskill existing workers or hire job-ready talent. 
  • Flexible Working Arrangements: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee reviewed S.230, a bill that would require employers to grant employee requests for flexible working arrangements, shifting the onus to businesses to prove these arrangements would not work.  
  • Career Technical Education (CTE): The House Commerce and Economic Development, House Education, and Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committees heard testimony on the Administration’s proposal to consolidate CTE leadership under the Agency of Education. The practicality and effectiveness of shifting oversight of this vital system to an agency already burdened by broader education reform efforts will need significant analysis if this proposal moves forward. 
  • Miscellaneous Tax Policy: The House Ways and Means Committee reviewed a miscellaneous tax bill that would make technical changes to the Vermont tax code, including repealing the denial of other state tax credits(OSCR) for S Corporations, aligning them with other passthrough entities. This small shift could simplify tax procedures and make Vermont more hospitable to S Corporations. 
  • Education: The Senate Finance Committee reviewed education reform and funding discussions, hearing a report from the school redistricting task force, which fell short of making required recommendations on district consolidation. With a projected average 12 percent property tax increase looming, debates continue over potential one-time buy-downs. Difficult decisions must be made to rein in education spending and to improve system efficiency. 
  • Energy Code: The House Energy and Digital Infrastructure Committee reviewed H.718, a bill that would push enforcement of existing residential and commercial building energy codes, require new disclosures and training for contractors, and allow municipalities to enforce energy codes alongside the state. If advanced, this bill could add regulatory layers and administrative complexity, a move that directly conflicts with the urgent housing crisis.   
  • Purchase and Use Tax: Following the Governor’s call for a gradual restoration of purchase and use tax revenue to the Transportation Fund, the House Ways and Means Committee briefly introduced H.643, a bill to fully restore that revenue immediately. This move would allow Vermont to continue to meet federal match requirements and maintain $163 million in funding. Urgent action remains essential to ensure the stability and long-term maintenance of the state’s road infrastructure. 
  • Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy Projects (C-PACE): The Senate Natural Resources Committee continued testimony on S.138, a bill proposing to expand the PACE program to include commercial and industrial buildings. The expansion would allow business owners to finance energy improvements and repay the cost over time through a special assessment on its property tax bill. 
  • Wastewater: The Senate Natural Resources committee reviewed S.212, a bill aimed at streamlining the wastewater connections permitting process and enhancing coordination between municipal and state-level permitting systems. This measure would help reduce timelines and increase the efficiency of new development projects.  
  • Corporate Tax: The House Ways and Means committee continued testimony on impacts of selective decoupling from federal tax code changes, which would raise the cost of innovation, increase tax code complexity, and penalize firms investing in productivity and higher-wage jobs. In a state with a shrinking workforce, productivity-led growth is essential, especially as Vermont already ranks near the bottom nationally in business formation, investment momentum, and economic growth.  

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of January 13, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of January 13, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Land Use: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee reviewed updates to Act 250 regulations through Act 181. The Vermont Chamber is asking for specific technical corrections to Act 181 to achieve the legislative goal incentivizing critical housing creation in smart growth areas while also protecting critical natural resources in areas of statewide significance.
  • Housing: The House General and Housing committee continued to take testimony on what is working, and what is still needed to address Vermont’s housing crisis. With the robust input received, the committee is expected to start working on housing specific legislation in the coming weeks.
  • Employment Options for Newly Released People: The House Commerce and Economic Development and House Corrections and Institutions Committees heard testimony on vocational, training, and educational programs for individuals reentering the workforce after incarceration. These programs play a critical role in boosting workforce participation.
  • Tax Classifications: The House Ways and Means Committee heard testimony on the Property Tax Classifications Implementation Report, outlining the extensive resources needed to add a third classification targeting second homes by 2028. Many challenges need to be addressed before implementation, including unfunded town mandates, creation of dwelling use attestation forms for properties with over 4 dwelling units, and employee housing.
  • Mileage-Based User Fees: As Vermont prepares to transition from a flat annual EV fee to a per-mile EV charge in 2027, the Senate Transportation Committee heard testimony on implementation strategies.
  • Data Brokers: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee has begun testimony on H.211, a data broker bill that, as amended, dramatically expands the definition of “data broker” and changes standing definitions. The existing data broker law was the result of hundreds of hours of stakeholder and lawmaker collaboration to carefully construct definitions that will not have unintended consequences. The draft throws out that work. The Vermont Chamber will be watching this bill to ensure necessary due diligence is done.
  • Education Spending: The Senate Finance Committee reviewed S.220, a bill that would cap education spending growth in 2028 and 2029 to help limit property tax increases. The proposal has faced strong opposition from education stakeholders, and from some members in committee. However, addressing Vermont’s affordability crisis will require confronting the unsustainable growth in education spending, and spending caps are increasingly viewed as a necessary if difficult step toward greater fiscal discipline and predictability for taxpayers.
  • Vermont Employment Growth Initiative (VEGI): The Senate Finance committee reviewed S.225, a bill that would repeal the sunset of the VEGI program. Making the program permanent would ensure continued access to this key economic development tool for business expansion and job creation.
  • Mediation Services: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee reviewed S.173, a bill that would create a new state position offering mediation services to both public and private sector businesses and their employees’ collective bargaining units.
  • Advance Vermont: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee heard testimony from AdvanceVT on MyFutureVT, a program offering free online resources to support education and career advancement. Businesses are encouraged to use this tool to support employee retention and skills development efforts.
  • Permit Modernization: The House Environment committee heard testimony on modernizing Vermont’s housing permitting system, focusing on increasing cross-agency coordination, data entry, and consolidation of permit processes to a single point of entry using shared data. With development of a pilot program underway, agencies hope to reduce time and cost associated with building housing units.
  • Telecommunications: The House Energy and Digital Infrastructure committee heard testimony on H.527, a bill that extends the sunset on the Public Utilities Commission’s authority to approve telecommunications projects, keeping applications outside of the lengthy ACT 250 approval process. Preserving this authority ensures continued expedited procedures for broadband expansion and rural infrastructure investments.
  • Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy Projects (C-PACE): The Vermont Chamber testified before the Senate Natural Resources Committee on S.138, a bill proposing to expand the PACE program to include commercial and industrial buildings. The expansion would allow business owners to finance energy improvements and repay the cost over time through a special assessment on their property tax bill.
  • Hospital Budgets: The House Health Care Committee received updates on last year’s legislation aimed at reducing hospital budgets and implementing a reference-based pricing model by 2028 in efforts to lower insurance rate increases and improve healthcare costs for Vermont ratepayers.
  • Revenue Forecast: The Vermont Emergency Board, House and Senate Appropriations, House Ways and Means, and Senate Finance committees reviewed an update to the state revenue forecast indicating revenue will be on par with previous estimates. Corporate income tax is expected to come in behind estimates, underscoring the need for stable and predictable policies to reduce further strain on the business community.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of January 6, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of January 6, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Groundwater: The Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules approved a rule change tightening groundwater enforcement standards for certain PFAS chemicals. The new rules exclude wastewater, stormwater, and sewage, but stricter standards could affect businesses with indirect discharge permits or other PFAS-related discharges.
  • Electricity Storage: The Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules approved a new rule establishing guidelines for energy storage.
  • Budget Adjustment Act: Legislators heard testimony as part of the annual Budget Adjustment Act process, an annual mid-year adjustment to the current budget. In a letter to House and Senate Appropriations committees, the Governor emphasized preserving as much of the $75 million surplus as possible to help offset a projected 12 percent property tax increase in the upcoming budget cycle.
  • Noncompete: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee reviewed findings from the Non-Compete Agreements Study Committee, which concluded that non-compete agreements are appropriate for high-wage employees with access to proprietary information. The Vermont Chamber will work to ensure any legislation preserves employers’ ability to protect sensitive business information.
  • Franchisors: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee heard testimony on potential regulation of franchisors. Vermont lacks data on the number and structure of franchises operating in the state, making it difficult to assess the scope or justify a new regulatory program.
  • Event Ticket Marketing: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee resumed testimony on H.512, a bill aimed at reining in the marked-up resale of event tickets. The Vermont Chamber will continue to closely monitor this issue as the bill develops.
  • Rural Health Care: The House Health Care Committee heard testimony on the federal Rural Health Transformation Program grant, which will provide Vermont with $195 million annually for the next five years. The funding will support rural hospital improvements, bolster the rural health workforce, and modernize rural health systems.
  • Convention Center Task Force: The House Commerce and Economic Development and Senate Economic Development Housing, and General Affairs committees reviewed the Convention Center Task Force report, which identified Burlington as the most feasible location for a convention center after input from industry stakeholders. Securing a viable funding model remains a significant challenge.
  • Transportation Fund: The House Ways and Means and House Transportation Committees heard testimony on growing shortfalls in the Transportation Fund. Without increased funding, Vermont risks losing federal match dollars, and over 50 percent of state-maintained roads are projected to fall into poor or worse condition within the next five years.
  • Community and Housing Infrastructure Program (CHIP): The House Commerce and Economic Development and House General and Housing Committees heard testimony on the rollout of the Community and Housing Infrastructure Program (CHIP), established last session. The program allows municipalities and qualified sponsors to invest in infrastructure that supports housing development, with applications set to open at the end of the month.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Choosing Progress: Vermont Chamber’s 2026 Legislative Priorities

Choosing Progress: A Unified Path Toward Affordability and Economic Resilience

Vermont can no longer admire the problem. It must act, guided by data, employers, and long-term planning.

Each year, the Vermont Chamber of Commerce sets legislative priorities grounded in one core objective: advancing the Vermont economy. As we enter the 2026 session, Vermont stands at a defining moment. Affordability pressures, demographic decline, and rising operating costs are converging just as our state needs more workers, more housing, and greater predictability to sustain economic growth.

Our work toward long-range strategy began with the Vermont Economic Action Plan, a statewide blueprint shaped by more than 5,000 Vermonters. The plan established a clear vision for a stronger and more affordable future, grounded in data, pairing community insight and measurable targets. It also signaled a pivotal shift in how Vermont approaches economic decision-making. Instead of reacting to problems as they arise, we now have a long-term framework that can guide policy choices and align efforts across the public and private sectors.

This alignment is urgently needed. The Vermont Futures Project’s Competitiveness Dashboard shows Vermont trailing most states in economic outlook, cost competitiveness, and regulatory efficiency. Vermont ranks 49th in Economic Outlook and continues to struggle with slow economic growth, high costs of doing business, and a demographic profile that strains employers and public systems. Results from this year’s Business Climate Survey reinforce this landscape. Employers identified taxes, regulation, labor shortages, healthcare costs, and housing challenges as the most significant barriers to growth.

Many employers voiced concern that the state’s policy direction is disconnected from Vermont’s economic reality, and that they do not feel heard in Montpelier. Business leaders shared examples of policy decisions advancing without a clear understanding of operational impacts. This sentiment reflects a growing disconnect at the same moment Vermont needs alignment around affordability, stability, and long-term economic strategy. It also underscores the essential role the Vermont Chamber plays in bringing employer perspectives to the policy and regulatory tables and ensuring economic policy aligns with economic reality. Addressing Vermont’s challenges requires a sustained commitment to coordinated, data-informed action.


Many employers voiced concern that the state’s policy direction is disconnected from Vermont’s economic reality, and that they do not feel heard in Montpelier. Business leaders shared examples of policy decisions advancing without a clear understanding of operational impacts. This sentiment reflects a growing disconnect at the same moment Vermont needs alignment around affordability, stability, and long-term economic strategy. It also underscores the essential role the Vermont Chamber plays in bringing employer perspectives to the policy and regulatory tables and ensuring economic policy aligns with economic reality. Addressing Vermont’s challenges requires a sustained commitment to coordinated, data-informed action.



How confident or concerned are you about Vermont’s elected officials understanding of the economic pressures facing businesses?
A post on Datawrapper provided by: https://datawrapper.de

While there is difficult work ahead, progress was made last year on housing infrastructure, workforce programming, and slowing the growth of healthcare costs. While these advances were important, they are not enough on their own. Vermont must shift from episodic decision-making to a consistent, long-range economic strategy. The Economic Action Plan provides that roadmap. Paired with disciplined and transparent leadership, it offers a path toward measurable improvements for both families and employers.

Our 2026 legislative agenda reflects this approach and focuses on four core areas aligned with statewide priorities and employer needs:

Economic Abundance Through Fiscal Stewardship
Vermont must adopt predictable fiscal practices that control cost growth and strengthen affordability for families and employers. With state spending up more than three billion dollars in five years, the need for disciplined decision making is clear.

Regulatory Modernization and Predictability
A modernized regulatory system must support timely housing and economic development. Streamlined permitting and clearer rules will reduce costs, shorten timelines, and restore Vermont’s competitiveness.

Workforce and Housing Alignment
Employers report that workforce pressures and housing shortages remain among their highest concerns. Strengthening recruitment and retention requires connecting training strategies, talent attraction, and coordinated housing solutions.

Industry Competitiveness
Manufacturing, tourism, healthcare, technology, and small businesses all face rising pressures. Strategic investments in infrastructure, innovation, and cost containment will strengthen these key sectors.

As we begin the 2026 session, Vermont faces a choice. We need to shift from a scarcity mindset to an abundance mindset. The path forward requires courage, collaboration, and a commitment to measurable progress. Employers are ready to be partners in this work. Policymakers must be equally ready to align decisions with long-term strategy and economic reality.

Vermont’s future is not predetermined. It is shaped by the choices we make together. The Vermont Chamber stands ready to partner in this work and ensure our state’s economic story continues toward resilience, prosperity, and opportunity for all.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Vermont Chamber Releases 2025 Session Legislative Outcomes Report, Focuses on Affordability, Reform, and Resilience

Vermont Chamber Releases 2025 Session Legislative Outcomes Report, Focuses on Affordability, Reform, and Resilience

Montpelier, VT (July 15, 2025) – The Vermont Chamber of Commerce has released its 2025 Session Legislative Outcomes Report, a comprehensive review of key policy developments that impacted the state’s business environment during the recent legislative session.

 

“As we reflect on the 2025 legislative session, we are reminded of both the responsibility and the opportunity that come with representing Vermont’s diverse and resilient business community,” said Amy Spear, President of the Vermont Chamber of Commerce.

 

In a year defined by escalating fiscal pressures, a deepening affordability crisis, and a $9 billion state budget, the Vermont Chamber remained focused on championing a pragmatic, data-informed policy agenda. The rising cost of living, a severe housing shortage, and unsustainable healthcare and education expenses require more than short-term fixes. These challenges demand durable, systemic solutions that prioritize growth and elevate the voices of Vermonters, whether heard around family tables, in boardrooms, or on the factory floor.

 

This session unfolded in the shadow of expiring federal relief funds and prolonged legislative deliberations. Yet, through it all, the Vermont Chamber maintained a steady course: advocating for smart housing development, protecting businesses from disproportionate tax burdens, and initiating the long-term work of bending the cost curve in education and healthcare.

 

The report details how the Vermont Chamber helped collaboratively shape outcomes in areas including taxation, labor law, housing, healthcare, technology, and economic development, while remaining steadfast in protecting businesses from harmful mandates and excessive fiscal burdens.

 

Gains were possible during the session because Vermont Chamber members were engaged, vocal, and resolute. Despite a continued pattern of high spending, with new mandates and regulatory burdens, the Legislature delivered new opportunities in housing and infrastructure development, and reforms in education and healthcare. The Vermont business community will be shaped for years to come by what happened, and what didn’t happen, this session.

 

Highlights from the 2025 Session Legislative Outcomes Report:

  • Legislative Engagement: Vermont Chamber staff testified 39 times before committees and monitored 865 committee hearings. Eight legislative interns also joined the Vermont Chamber team this session, strengthening advocacy capacity.
  • Affordability Through Critical Reform: The Vermont Chamber helped steer policies addressing healthcare cost containment, education funding, stormwater compliance flexibility, and tax fairness, ensuring that reforms advanced without placing disproportionate burdens on employers.
  • Incremental Progress on Long-Term Goals: Laws impacting chemical regulation, health system oversight, and environmental permitting demonstrated where constructive compromise was possible. The Vermont Chamber remained at the table to promote pragmatic, step-by-step progress.
  • Innovative Solutions for People and Places: The Vermont Chamber championed investments in housing infrastructure, workforce development, and sustained support for tourism, trade, and entrepreneurship. These priorities are grounded in the long-term vision of the Vermont Futures Project Economic Action Plan. They underscore Vermont’s imperative to attract and retain talent while fostering vibrant communities and improving affordability. The plan presents a dual framework focused on people and places, with actionable strategies to recruit and retain working-age residents, increase labor force participation, expand housing and infrastructure, and align policy with evolving community needs. Advancing these strategies is essential to strengthening affordability, enhancing community vitality, and securing a more prosperous future.
  • Removal of Harmful Proposals: Unified advocacy helped remove a proposed business-only property tax classification from major education legislation and paused efforts to implement sweeping employer mandates that would have increased costs.

“As we look to 2026, we’ll continue leading with transparency, determination, and collaboration,” added Spear. “From affordability to abundance and innovation, Vermont’s economic resilience depends on policies that reflect the realities of doing business in our state. Our mission remains clear: to ensure all Vermonters have the opportunity to thrive.”

 

The report also outlines pending legislation expected to be revisited next year, including non-compete agreements, data privacy, and climate regulation, and reinforces the Vermont Chamber’s ongoing commitment to advocating practical, systemic solutions at the State House.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

26 Ways Legislative and Executive Action or Inaction Could Impact Businesses After the 2025 Session

26 Ways Legislative and Executive Action or Inaction Could Impact Businesses After the 2025 Session

The 2025 legislative session delivered a mix of progress, pause, and uncertainty for Vermont employers. Lawmakers advanced proposals to support workforce development, housing, and infrastructure—but also continued a pattern of high spending, new mandates, and regulatory burdens.

 

Key decisions this year—from to-go cocktails to major education and tax reforms—will shape Vermont’s business climate for years to come. Below is a snapshot of 26 developments, delays, and decisions from the session that employers should know.

 

🪙$ 3 Billion in cost increases over the last  five years as the state budget has ballooned from $5.8 billion to $9.1 billion in spending. This year-over-year increase is a troubling pattern for an affordable future.

 

🚛Costly EV truck and car regulations under the Clean Car and Clean Truck Acts were paused by Governor Scott, recognizing the lack of available EV infrastructure and affordable all-electric vehicle options for businesses and consumers.

 

🤝The Small Business Development Center  received an additional $150,000 in state funding to provide expert advising to businesses across the state.

 

🍹A pandemic innovation, to-go cocktails will be a permanent program allowing restaurants to offer drinks to-go with takeout food orders.

 

🧪Chemicals used in manufacturing will receive additional regulatory oversight or a full ban with a timeline for implementation phased in over the next few years.

 

👩‍⚕️Small businesses will not have to shoulder the added weight of subsidizing premiums for the individual healthcare market. The individual and small group markets have been permanently separated.

 

🫂Unpaid Leave Expansion starts July 1, creating an expanded, more inclusive definition of family, and adding other types of leave, including bereavement and safe leave.

 

👩🏽‍🎓Advance Vermont received $150,000 in funding to continue building out Vermont’s premier online hub for career and education exploration and planning.

 

🧑🏽‍🍳Non-stick cookware ban has been pushed back to 2028 to allow more time for alternative products to be widely available for consumers and restaurants.

 

💵Property taxes were bought down with $77 million in one-time funds to keep this year’s increase at an average of 1%. It is not clear yet how that bill will be paid next year.

 

🪖Military Retiree Pensions will be exempt from taxation at $125,000 of income and scaled down to $175,000 of income, making Vermont a more desirable destination for retirees in search of a second career.

 

💦Stormwater Management reforms extend deadlines for business to comply with three-acre impervious surface permits, with varying dates depending on the watershed. 

 

🏠Available Housing remains elusive for middle-income Vermonters, but some relief will be felt with $15 million of funding in the budget for the Missing Middle-Income Homeownership Development Program and the Renter Revolving Loan Fund.

 

🍀Irish Trade could be in focus with a newly created Irish Trade Commission aimed at opening new markets between Vermont and the Emerald Isle.  

 

💻Data Privacy legislation that balanced consumer protections with business access to digital marketing tools passed the Senate unanimously before being inexplicably sidelined in the House. The bill is expected to be taken up again next year. For now, Vermont businesses remain unregulated, and Vermonters have no legal data privacy protections.

 

🌲Rural infrastructure capacity got a major boost with the creation of a new tax increment financing tool, which can be used by small and large communities to build  infrastructure that will support housing.

 

🏫Education Reform crossed its major hurdle with a sweeping reform bill aimed at revamping the entire system’s financial and governance structures in an effort to control costs and refocus the education system on students.

 

💰Proposed Business Only Property Tax Classification, which meant to treat businesses as a valve to stabilize other taxpayers, was removed from the education reform bill after advocacy from the business community and the Governor. This demonstrated the power of coordinated business advocacy.

 

🏘️Infrastructure Sustainability Fund was created and funded with $7.5 million in the Vermont Bond Bank to expand infrastructure development financing opportunities across Vermont.

 

❤️‍🩹Healthcare Premiums are expected to see a fourth year of unsustainable increases, but with a new law which will limit the markup of certain prescription drugs, those increases will be 4% lower than originally projected.

 

🤖UVM Tech Hub will leverage $750,000 in newly appropriated state funds, with additional private investment, to fuel business growth and rural workforce development across the state.

 

👷🏽‍♀️Employer Mandates were largely tabled this year after critical testimony on the various proposals put forward. Increasing minimum wage to  $25 an hour, implementing a fine for not providing enough employee seating, removing at-will employment, and mandating temperature related benefits are just a few of the proposals that businesses will not need to implement this year. However, they may re-emerge next year for consideration.

 

🍁Montreal Business Development Office will continue to operate, encouraging Canadian businesses to consider expansion opportunities in Vermont with an investment of $150,000 for the next year.

 

🏢Convention Center Feasibility will be studied over the summer by interested parties to understand what is involved in bringing larger conventions, and the dollars that follow, to the Green Mountain State.

 

🧹Brownfield remediation projects will get another $1 million in funding for the assessment, remediation, and redevelopment of sites.

 

💸Clean Heat Standard was neither implemented nor repealed. As a result, this high expense program will not move forward this year, though further legislative action is needed with the Global Warming Solutions Act lawsuits still looming.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

Balanced Data Privacy Bill Receives Unanimous Support in the Senate

Balanced Data Privacy Bill Receives Unanimous Support in the Senate

This week, the Vermont Senate unanimously passed a comprehensive data privacy bill, signaling strong bipartisan support for the protection of Vermonters’ personal data and Vermont’s economy. The bill, which was supported by Vermont business organizations, nonprofits, and medical providers, aligns with the privacy framework passed in other New England states and outlined in Governor Scott’s veto last year. By passing the bill, the Senate has sent a clear message: Vermonters deserve strong privacy protections, and Senate lawmakers are listening to the concerns of trusted local organizations.

During the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affair’s review of the bill, Senate Majority Leader Kesha Ram Hinsdale expressed the Senate’s commitment to the bill, stating, “I will say on the record, if you touch a hair on this bill’s head it may not garner the votes in the Senate to pass.” This statement underscores the Senate’s resolve to keep the bill intact as it moves to the House. Despite external pressures from out-of-state interests trying to push Vermont toward more extreme policies, the Senate has prioritized a solution that balances privacy rights with the needs of Vermont’s economy.

The bill was reported by Bennington Senator Rob Plunkett, a meaningful moment for the businesses in his district, which have been a prominent voice on this issue. This action by the Senate highlights the importance of creating a privacy framework that protects local businesses from unnecessary legal risks. As the bill moves to the House, the Vermont Chamber hopes to see the same commitment to a regionally compatible approach that supports Vermont’s economy while safeguarding privacy. We thank the Senate for their thoughtful, bipartisan leadership and urge the House to follow this show of leadership.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS