26 Ways Legislative and Executive Action or Inaction Could Impact Businesses After the 2025 Session

26 Ways Legislative and Executive Action or Inaction Could Impact Businesses After the 2025 Session

The 2025 legislative session delivered a mix of progress, pause, and uncertainty for Vermont employers. Lawmakers advanced proposals to support workforce development, housing, and infrastructure—but also continued a pattern of high spending, new mandates, and regulatory burdens.

 

Key decisions this year—from to-go cocktails to major education and tax reforms—will shape Vermont’s business climate for years to come. Below is a snapshot of 26 developments, delays, and decisions from the session that employers should know.

 

🪙$ 3 Billion in cost increases over the last  five years as the state budget has ballooned from $5.8 billion to $9.1 billion in spending. This year-over-year increase is a troubling pattern for an affordable future.

 

🚛Costly EV truck and car regulations under the Clean Car and Clean Truck Acts were paused by Governor Scott, recognizing the lack of available EV infrastructure and affordable all-electric vehicle options for businesses and consumers.

 

🤝The Small Business Development Center  received an additional $150,000 in state funding to provide expert advising to businesses across the state.

 

🍹A pandemic innovation, to-go cocktails will be a permanent program allowing restaurants to offer drinks to-go with takeout food orders.

 

🧪Chemicals used in manufacturing will receive additional regulatory oversight or a full ban with a timeline for implementation phased in over the next few years.

 

👩‍⚕️Small businesses will not have to shoulder the added weight of subsidizing premiums for the individual healthcare market. The individual and small group markets have been permanently separated.

 

🫂Unpaid Leave Expansion starts July 1, creating an expanded, more inclusive definition of family, and adding other types of leave, including bereavement and safe leave.

 

👩🏽‍🎓Advance Vermont received $150,000 in funding to continue building out Vermont’s premier online hub for career and education exploration and planning.

 

🧑🏽‍🍳Non-stick cookware ban has been pushed back to 2028 to allow more time for alternative products to be widely available for consumers and restaurants.

 

💵Property taxes were bought down with $77 million in one-time funds to keep this year’s increase at an average of 1%. It is not clear yet how that bill will be paid next year.

 

🪖Military Retiree Pensions will be exempt from taxation at $125,000 of income and scaled down to $175,000 of income, making Vermont a more desirable destination for retirees in search of a second career.

 

💦Stormwater Management reforms extend deadlines for business to comply with three-acre impervious surface permits, with varying dates depending on the watershed. 

 

🏠Available Housing remains elusive for middle-income Vermonters, but some relief will be felt with $15 million of funding in the budget for the Missing Middle-Income Homeownership Development Program and the Renter Revolving Loan Fund.

 

🍀Irish Trade could be in focus with a newly created Irish Trade Commission aimed at opening new markets between Vermont and the Emerald Isle.  

 

💻Data Privacy legislation that balanced consumer protections with business access to digital marketing tools passed the Senate unanimously before being inexplicably sidelined in the House. The bill is expected to be taken up again next year. For now, Vermont businesses remain unregulated, and Vermonters have no legal data privacy protections.

 

🌲Rural infrastructure capacity got a major boost with the creation of a new tax increment financing tool, which can be used by small and large communities to build  infrastructure that will support housing.

 

🏫Education Reform crossed its major hurdle with a sweeping reform bill aimed at revamping the entire system’s financial and governance structures in an effort to control costs and refocus the education system on students.

 

💰Proposed Business Only Property Tax Classification, which meant to treat businesses as a valve to stabilize other taxpayers, was removed from the education reform bill after advocacy from the business community and the Governor. This demonstrated the power of coordinated business advocacy.

 

🏘️Infrastructure Sustainability Fund was created and funded with $7.5 million in the Vermont Bond Bank to expand infrastructure development financing opportunities across Vermont.

 

❤️‍🩹Healthcare Premiums are expected to see a fourth year of unsustainable increases, but with a new law which will limit the markup of certain prescription drugs, those increases will be 4% lower than originally projected.

 

🤖UVM Tech Hub will leverage $750,000 in newly appropriated state funds, with additional private investment, to fuel business growth and rural workforce development across the state.

 

👷🏽‍♀️Employer Mandates were largely tabled this year after critical testimony on the various proposals put forward. Increasing minimum wage to  $25 an hour, implementing a fine for not providing enough employee seating, removing at-will employment, and mandating temperature related benefits are just a few of the proposals that businesses will not need to implement this year. However, they may re-emerge next year for consideration.

 

🍁Montreal Business Development Office will continue to operate, encouraging Canadian businesses to consider expansion opportunities in Vermont with an investment of $150,000 for the next year.

 

🏢Convention Center Feasibility will be studied over the summer by interested parties to understand what is involved in bringing larger conventions, and the dollars that follow, to the Green Mountain State.

 

🧹Brownfield remediation projects will get another $1 million in funding for the assessment, remediation, and redevelopment of sites.

 

💸Clean Heat Standard was neither implemented nor repealed. As a result, this high expense program will not move forward this year, though further legislative action is needed with the Global Warming Solutions Act lawsuits still looming.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

Business Advocacy Helps Drives Key Change in Education Finance Bill

Business Advocacy Helps Drives Key Change in Education Finance Bill

In a major shift from earlier proposals, the latest version of Vermont’s education reform bill no longer includes a separate tax category that would have targeted businesses. This change follows sustained advocacy from employers across the state and represents a significant shift for Vermont’s business community.

Following heavy outreach from businesses, the conference committee on H.454 has adopted a new draft that eliminates the creation of a standalone “business” tax class. Instead, the latest version consolidates commercial, industrial, and rental properties into a single nonhomestead nonresidential category, replacing the four-tier classification system with a three-tier classification system.

What the New Language Does

The revised draft includes detailed implementation rules for how real estate will be classified for property tax purposes, beginning with calendar year 2027:

  • Every parcel on the grand list will be assigned one or more of three general classes:
    • Homestead: A parcel or portion of a parcel declared as a homestead by October 15.
    • Nonhomestead Residential: Year-round dwellings where no homestead was declared, and no long-term lease was reported.
    • Nonhomestead Nonresidential: All other property not meeting the definitions above, including businesses.
  • Parcels with multiple uses will be classified proportionally based on the floor space used for each purpose. However, if a homestead contains 25% or less business use, it will still be treated fully as a homestead.
  • Listers and assessors must update the grand list annually by June 1, with updates allowed after that date if taxpayers file or correct their declarations.
  • The Commissioner of Taxes will amend and issue new forms for classification and will collect data in 2027 to assign and report classifications statewide by October 1 of that year.

Appeals of property classifications can be made through the existing valuation appeal process. These provisions do not impact the treatment of parcels enrolled in Vermont’s current use (use value appraisal) program.

A Step in the Right Direction

While this adjustment resolves the most significant concern for Vermont businesses in H.454, the bill remains large in scope. The revised classification system still segregates second homes as a standalone classification, raising long-term concerns about the sustainability of a model that places increasing financial pressure on second home property owners, particularly in communities that depend on tourism and second home investment.

Moreover, the broader challenge remains: Vermont’s education finance system continues to struggle under the weight of high and rising costs. Rather than restructuring who pays more, long-term reforms must focus on what is being spent and why. Cost containment, not cost shifting, must be the foundation of future action.

What’s Next

The H.454 Committee of Conference continues to remain at odds on other areas of the bill but is expected to finalize the full bill before Monday, June 16, when the Legislature reconvenes to pass a final education funding package and adjourn for the session. The Vermont Chamber will continue to monitor the negotiations and advocate for a fair, sustainable system that shares responsibility across all property types, and does not jeopardize the state’s economic competitiveness.

In the meantime, Vermont’s business community recognizes and appreciates the lawmakers who listened to Vermont employers and revised the bill in response to real-world concerns. This outcome reflects the power of direct advocacy and the importance of Vermont businesses remaining active participants in shaping the policy decisions that affect them.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

NBT Chief Economist Ken Entenmann and Tax Commissioner Bill Shouldice Join Vermont Business Leaders for Wellspring Forum

NBT Chief Economist Ken Entenmann and Tax Commissioner Bill Shouldice Join Vermont Business Leaders for Wellspring Forum

Burlington, VT (June 12, 2025) – Vermont business and policy leaders gathered last week at NBT Bank in Burlington for the latest installment of the Vermont Chamber’s Wellspring Forum series. The event featured a timely conversation with Ken Entenmann, the Senior Vice President, Chief Investment Officer, and Chief Economist at NBT Wealth Management, and Vermont Tax Commissioner Bill Shouldice, moderated by Vermont Chamber President, Amy Spear.

“Connecting business and policy leaders around timely economic issues is central to our mission,” said Spear. “In today’s climate of uncertainty, data-informed dialogue is essential. Ken and Commissioner Shouldice provided valuable insight into how national and state-level trends intersect—and how we can move forward with clarity and focus.”

Entenmann offered a national perspective, using his now-familiar “soft vs. hard” ice cream analogy to explore the tension between market sentiment and economic fundamentals. He shared analysis on GDP, labor markets, and inflation, noting that while investor caution remains, the hard data points to continued resilience in the U.S. economy.

“Uncertainty is the one constant in today’s economic climate,” said Entenmann. “But we can still find clarity by focusing on what the data tells us—not just the headlines. That’s what allows businesses, investors, and policymakers to make smart, long-term decisions.”

Commissioner Shouldice brought the conversation closer to home, outlining Vermont’s fiscal footing and how recent legislative choices are shaping the state’s economic outlook. With experience spanning both public service and private sector leadership, Shouldice emphasized the importance of affordability, long-term planning, and aligning policy with real-time data.

“We are at an economic crossroads,” Shouldice said. “Creating an environment that is sustainable, predictable, and affordable for all Vermonters should be our primary focus. Vermonters work hard, and the Scott administration is thinking about ways to keep money in their pockets.”

The Wellspring Forum series is supported by NBT Bank. The event’s name draws inspiration from former Governor James H. Douglas, who once said: “I am often reminded that the wellspring of Vermont liberty flows from Main Street, not State Street.”

Businesses Are Not Valves: Chamber Raises Alarm on House Education Tax Proposal

Businesses Are Not Valves: Chamber Raises Alarm on House Education Tax Proposal

As the Legislature continues work on education finance reform, the Vermont Chamber is sounding the alarm on a House proposal that would create a new tax classification targeting Vermont businesses. Though the conference committee on H.454 has not reached final agreement, the House’s current position includes separating commercial and industrial properties into their own tax category—a move that could severely harm the state’s employer base.

During a recent conference committee meeting, House Ways and Means Chair Emilie Kornheiser made the intent behind the classification change clear:

“If we want to keep property taxes stable for homeowners and, um, landlords, we can only do that if we create other sort of valves to turn on and off, and so that is why this is in here as an intrinsic part of this proposal.”

In this context, those “valves” include businesses.

This approach sends the wrong message. Vermont businesses are not tools to balance the tax code, they are the backbone of our economy. They provide jobs, generate innovation, support community institutions, and are owned and operated by Vermonters who are deeply invested in our state’s future.

The House proposal seeks to solve what is fundamentally a spending problem by creating a new nonhomestead tax class that could be used to shift the burden onto businesses in future years. This sets a dangerous precedent that risks further economic strain on the very employers we rely on for growth and prosperity.

The Vermont Chamber urges lawmakers to reject this approach. Education finance reform should share responsibility fairly, lower the property tax burden across the board, and recognize that businesses are essential partners in building a stronger, more affordable Vermont.

What’s Next

The H.454 conference committee is scheduled to reconvene on June 10, with the full Legislature returning to Montpelier on June 16 to debate and pass a final education finance reform bill that will then go to the Governor’s desk.

In the meantime, lawmakers are no longer meeting in the State House—they are back in their districts, back among the constituents and communities they were elected to serve. This includes you, Vermont’s employers, who are not just job creators, but neighbors, civic leaders, and core members of the local economy.

Now is the time to act to ensure they fully understand the consequences of the current proposal.

Employers should:

  • Call or email your local legislators
  • Invite them to tour your business
  • Share your concerns about the proposed tax changes

Your direct outreach can shape the debate before lawmakers return to the State House. Let’s ensure they understand the real-world impact their decisions will have on the employers who power Vermont’s economy.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

Senate Poised for Debate on Sweeping Education Finance Overhaul

Senate Poised for Debate on Sweeping Education Finance Overhaul

Following last year’s 14%average property tax increase, Vermont’s education finance and delivery system stands at a critical juncture. H.454 aims to overhaul nearly every aspect of K–12 funding and delivery—from recalibrating property tax credits to introducing equalization measures designed to narrow funding gaps between districts. Passed by the Senate Finance Committee (5-2-0) late Thursday, the education transformation bill now moves to the Senate floor. With a spirited debate and at least one amendment expected, policymakers must balance ambitious reforms against the need to contain costs.

Key Fiscal Provisions

  • Property Tax Classifications: The House-passed version would have split Nonhomestead into four classes, raising the risk of disproportionate increases on commercial properties and adding administrative complexity. In its place, the Senate Finance Committee rolled back that expansion and instead directed the Department of Taxes to deliver, by December 15, 2025, a stakeholder-informed study on potential classification models—covering use-based definitions, mixed-use parcel treatment, data collection protocols, appeals processes, and compliance safeguards. The Vermont Chamber testified both in the House and the Senate, emphasizing that any reform to Vermont’s property tax system should prioritize simplicity, predictability, and fairness.
  • Homestead Exemption: The Committee’s draft holds Homestead relief at $1.6 million below the current income-sensitivity model for FY25, targets low- and moderate-income homeowners through a tiered cap on the exempted house site value, and phases out benefits above $100,000 of household income. Future review by the Tax Department may spur further adjustments.
  • Supplemental Spending & Equalization: Supplemental district spending remains capped at 10% of base funding. The Committee retained the House’s “lowest-rich-district” equalization approach for now, with plans to revisit averaging methodologies on the floor. Any excess revenue will flow into the School Construction Fund, helping to address long-term capital needs.

Looking Ahead
As discussions continue, the Vermont Chamber will remain engaged in the conversation, ensuring that potential business impacts are carefully balanced with the broader goals of funding a high-quality education system.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

Labor Market Data Underscores Need to Support the Statewide Economic Plan

Labor Market Data Underscores Need to Support the Statewide Economic Plan

New data from the Vermont Department of Labor was presented to the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee this week. The data underscores the urgency of addressing Vermont’s workforce challenges with a coordinated, long-term plan. While Vermont’s unemployment rate remains low, job growth in 2024 slowed dramatically to just 400 new positions statewide, leaving the state nearly 5,000 jobs below pre-pandemic levels.

This stagnation contrasts with national trends. Many states have rebounded past 2019 levels, buoyed by faster population growth and stronger economic momentum. Vermont’s modest gains came almost entirely from the Burlington metro area, where jobs grew by 900. Outside that region, employment is contracting, highlighting growing regional disparities and varied infrastructure and spending capabilities.

Many sectors continue to struggle. Manufacturing lost 800 jobs last year, and administrative support, wholesale trade, and hospitality all experienced declines. Manufacturing employment has now dropped two years in a row, raising red flags for a sector critical to Vermont’s economic diversity.

Complicating the picture is Vermont’s labor force composition. According to the latest Household Pulse Survey, 55.2% of Vermonters not working cited retirement as their main reason, compared to just 46.3% nationally. Vermont also reports more individuals caring for elderly family members, further reflecting the state’s aging demographic profile. While participation rates are rising modestly, the pool of working-age Vermonters is not growing fast enough to meet economic demand.

The data reinforces a clear trend: Vermont’s working-age population is shrinking faster than the national average. Our state cannot afford to approach workforce issues piecemeal. Policymakers must act on what the data clearly show: Vermont’s labor market is under strain from demographic pressures, uneven growth, and emerging economic volatility.

Long-term trends are not the only concern. The 2023-2024 data does not yet account for new economic stressors, including rising tariffs, global supply chain disruptions, and inflationary pressures, all of which are creating new challenges for employers in 2025.

The Vermont Chamber continues to call focus to the cohesive, statewide Economic Action Plan, produced by the Vermont Futures Project, that addresses these realities head-on. As Vermont’s economy continues to struggle, both efficiency and expansion strategies are required to address the need for growth in Vermont’s workforce. While the fragmented measures being taken by the Legislature may aspire to these goals, added scope, scale, and data-informed solutions are necessary to solve the root causes of Vermont’s workforce challenges. This includes investing in workforce retention and recruitment, expanding housing, and aligning education and training systems with Vermont’s current and future economic needs.

These aren’t new conversations, but the data makes them more urgent than ever. Now is the time for a strategy that prepares Vermont not just to recover, but to compete.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

Education Finance Reform and Property Tax Yield: Implications for Vermont Employers

Education Finance Reform and Property Tax Yield: Implications for Vermont Employers

The Vermont Legislature continues to advance two key pieces of education finance legislation: H.454, a comprehensive education finance reform bill, and H.491, the annual yield bill that sets property tax rates.

The Vermont Chamber provided testimony to the Senate Finance Committee on H.454, emphasizing that reforms must enhance Vermont’s economic competitiveness and avoid increasing cost pressures on employers. While the Vermont Chamber supports the goal of equitable education funding, concerns remain that proposed changes could increase tax complexity, reduce predictability, and add to the financial burden on job creators already navigating workforce shortages and inflation.

One significant area of concern in H.454 is the proposed shift from two to four property tax classifications: Homestead, Nonresidential, Residential, and Apartment. The Vermont Chamber has strongly urged lawmakers to maintain a unified Nonhomestead category, citing the risk of disproportionate tax hikes on commercial properties and added administrative burdens. With Vermont already ranked highest in the nation for per capita property tax burden, the proposed classification changes could have long-term consequences for business investment and affordability.

In Senate Education, the Agency of Education presented details on an “Enhanced Evidence-Based Model” for implementing the foundation formula, with a proposed FY25 funding level of $1.77 billion approximately 6% lower than current levels. The model would reallocate funds to categorical aid and implement a multi-year transition period (FY27–FY31), including phased increases for gaining districts and gradual reductions for those seeing decreases. However, modeling for these changes has not yet been shared with the Joint Fiscal Office, limiting the Legislature’s ability to fully evaluate fiscal impacts.

Meanwhile, the Senate Finance Committee also weighed decisions on H.491, the yield bill. The bill proposes using $77 million in General Fund revenue and $42 million in Education Fund debt to reduce the projected property tax increase. Lawmakers debated whether to apply the full buy-down to provide immediate taxpayer relief or reserve a portion to offset future rate hikes. With some districts seeing up to 20% increases in recent years, many supported full use of available funds this year. The Senate Finance Committee ultimately advanced the House-passed version of the bill, which includes the full $77 million buy-down in a vote of 6-1-0.

As these critical conversations continue, the Vermont Chamber remains engaged to ensure that education finance reform achieves long-term stability and equity without compromising affordability or economic growth.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

Proposed Housing Infrastructure Program Advances in Legislature

Proposed Housing Infrastructure Program Advances in Legislature

As Vermont employers continue to face workforce shortages driven in part by a lack of available housing, the Legislature is considering a new tool to address this challenge. The Community and Housing Infrastructure Program (CHIP) proposed in S.127 would give municipalities the ability to invest in infrastructure that enables the development of housing, borrowing against future tax revenue rather than increasing taxes. The Vermont Chamber strongly supports this legislation as an innovative solution that could support workforce growth, strengthen communities, and make meaningful use of constrained public resources.

Program Overview:
CHIP is designed to help communities overcome infrastructure barriers that prevent new housing development. If enacted, it would allow municipalities to use future local property tax revenue growth—via a housing-specific form of tax increment financing (TIF)—to fund infrastructure improvements that support housing construction.

Key Components:

  • Municipal Participation: Towns and cities could create housing infrastructure projects, requiring a development plan, public hearings, and local approval.
  • Housing Infrastructure Agreement: A binding agreement would be required between the municipality, developer, and potentially a third-party sponsor.
  • VEPC Review: The Vermont Economic Progress Council (VEPC) would review applications and approve eligible projects based on housing development goals and location criteria.
  • Eligible Infrastructure: Includes utilities, broadband, roads, brownfield remediation, flood mitigation, and other core infrastructure.
  • Financing Structure: Municipalities could borrow against future property tax growth, subject to voter approval, with a portion of both municipal and education property tax increment retained to repay project costs.
  • Oversight and Accountability: Annual reporting and audits would be required, with guidance from VEPC and the Department of Taxes.

Legislative Activity:
In a recent House Commerce Committee hearing, stakeholders emphasized that CHIP could help close Vermont’s $240 million infrastructure funding gap by giving communities a flexible new financing tool without relying on additional state spending. The program is not intended to replace existing funding, but to provide a complementary approach. There was strong support for CHIP’s inclusion of flood mitigation, especially for rural towns, and for its focus on publicly owned infrastructure that benefits residents across income levels. Concerns were raised about provisions that could shift long-term debt to non-governmental partners.

Committee discussion also addressed how the program could help grow local grand lists. Testimony emphasized that the most recent grand list growth has come from property revaluations rather than new development, and that adding housing stock is a more sustainable way to increase the tax base. With Vermont’s state budget under pressure, tools like CHIP offer communities a way to finance needed infrastructure for housing, building long-term capacity and supporting workforce needs without increasing taxes. The Vermont Chamber will continue to engage with and support this legislation as it moves forward.

Tourism Economy Day Brings Business and Policy Leaders Together at the State House

Tourism Economy Day Brings Business and Policy Leaders Together at the State House

Over 100 tourism and hospitality industry leaders gathered at the State House on April 10 to engage with legislators and raise awareness of the collective contributions of these industries to the Vermont economy. Tourism Economy Day, convened by the Vermont Chamber of Commerce, Ski Vermont and Vermont Specialty Food Association, brought businesses together to advocate for a thriving Vermont visitor economy.

The Vermont visitor economy has a $4 billion annual economic impact and represents 10% of our workforce. In 2023 alone, 15.8 million visitors spent $4.0 billion across lodging, dining, retail, entertainment, recreation, and more. Their spending also contributed $282.3 million in state and local taxes—equivalent to approximately $1,039 per Vermont household. Businesses, legislative leaders, and Administration officials collaborated for a day of advocacy that elevated the collective contributions of the visitor economy to Vermont. Advocacy day highlights included a joint hearing with the Senate Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs and House Committee on Commerce and Economic Development, a joint resolution recognizing April 10, 2025, as Tourism Economy Day, and an evening food and beverage tasting reception with the Vermont Specialty Food Association.

Rep. Abbey Duke (Chittenden-17), a stalwart supporter of the tourism industry, shared “Vermont’s tourism sector is a cornerstone of our state economy, generating billions in economic activity, supporting tens of thousands of jobs, and enriching our communities. It’s essential for legislators to support policies that foster sustainable growth in tourism, including investments in infrastructure, housing, workforce development, and supporting local businesses.”

“A thriving tourism economy means vibrant communities and a chance for everyone—whether you’re a local or a visitor—to experience the very best of Vermont. However, the industry is facing challenges echoed by so many across the state: an aging declining workforce and a critical housing shortage.” said Amy Spear, President of the Vermont Chamber of Commerce. “It’s crucial that we find a path towards affordability and abundance, improving economic conditions. Vermont’s beauty and charm are undeniable, and together, we can create an environment where both our tourism industry and our communities can thrive for generations to come.”

Business leaders highlighted the following sentiments in their testimonies: the role of tourism supporting Vermont’s economy and communities, the industry’s centrality in providing jobs and making Vermont an appealing destination to both live and visit, and the collective challenges facing businesses in the industry, including: workforce shortages, workforce housing accessibility and affordability, rising taxes and high operating costs and a strained relationship with Canadian neighbors due to federal rhetoric.

“Outdoor recreation is a significant part of Vermont’s tourism economy, driving visits and fueling the economy in many rural parts of our state. In 2023, outdoor recreation accounted for 4.8% of the state’s GDP, or $2.1B annually, and 5.1% of the state’s workforce, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis,” said Molly Mahar, President of Vermont Ski Areas Association. “Vermont ranks second only to Hawaii in percent of GDP generated by outdoor recreation, which is largely driven by activities like skiing, snowboarding, hiking, mountain biking, and camping. However, businesses are grappling with workforce and housing shortages, higher costs, and new uncertainty around Canadian visitation levels, which limit growth.”

Additional business and policy leaders that testified were Nina Ridhibhinyo, Director of Programs & Strategy at ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain, Randy George, Owner of Red Hen Baking Co., Québec Delegate Rene Sylvestre of the Québec Government Office in Boston, Will Kriewald, CEO of Basin Harbor Resort and Boat Club, Abby Long, Executive Director of Kingdom Trails, Kate Trzaskos, Executive Director of Downtown Brattleboro, Vicky Allard, Founder and Executive Chef at Blake Hill Preserves, Steve Wright, President/General Manager at Jay Peak Resort, and Kim Jackson, Director of Communications and Marketing at Vermont Adaptive.

The day ended with a Vermont Specialty Food Association Legislative Tasting, featuring vendors from across Vermont. Karin Cioffi, Executive Director of VSFA shared, “Vermont’s specialty food and beverage producers are a cornerstone of the state’s identity and a driving force behind the visitor experience. Tourists don’t just come for the views, they come to taste Vermont. From handcrafted cheeses to small batch spirits, these products represent the passion, innovation, and resilience of our local businesses. Our evening tasting event at the State House showcased the incredible talent of producers across the state and underscored just how vital this industry is to Vermont’s economy, culture, and continued appeal as a destination.”

Photo Credit for Images 3 and 4: Blake Hill Preserves

Vermont’s Education Reform Bill May Expose Businesses to Higher Taxes

Vermont’s Education Reform Bill May Expose Businesses to Higher Taxes

The Vermont House of Representatives passed H.454 (87-55) a sweeping education reform bill aimed at addressing education finance and delivery. While the bill passed, it contains many controversial provisions that will require further debate in the Senate. Notably, significant property tax classification changes are likely to affect the business community. The move could expose businesses to higher rates with recent actions casting doubt on promises to protect businesses. As passed by the House, the proposal expands property classifications from two to four:

  • Homestead
  • Nonhomestead, Apartment
  • Nonhomestead, Nonresidential
  • Nonhomestead, Residential

Although other sections of the bill were updated through a bipartisan amendment, many members still found them inadequate, and proposals to support Vermont’s business community were entirely omitted from the compromise. At a time when employers face workforce shortages, inflation, and national regulatory changes, the lack of meaningful state-level support is increasingly unsustainable.

The Vermont Chamber remains concerned and opposes the expansion of property tax classifications; more specifically, the creation of a category singling out businesses creating an opening for inequitable tax treatment, increasing the risk of higher tax rates in future years.

While some legislators insist that there is no intention to raise taxes on businesses, recent actions have undermined that promise. For instance, last year, the House passed $125 million in new taxes on businesses and working Vermonters, as well as a larger increase in the Nonhomestead property tax rate in comparison to the Homestead rate.

The Vermont Chamber advocated for the combination of the Nonhomestead, Apartment and Nonhomestead, Nonresidential categories into one unified Nonhomestead category. This consolidation would recognize that both property types share similar market-driven and investment characteristics, setting them apart from Nonhomestead, Residential properties. This consolidation would simplify the system, promote equity, and better protect Vermont’s overburdened business community.

Following a floor debate, a roll call vote was taken so that constituents could see their legislators’ positions on this critical issue. As the bill advances to the Senate, there is hope that a more balanced approach will be adopted to address education governance and finance reform, tackle cost containment, and prevent businesses from being singled out to bear an increasing share of the state’s tax burden.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS