Data Privacy: Movement, But Major Decisions Ahead

Data Privacy: Movement, But Major Decisions Ahead

Data privacy negotiations are entering a more active and consequential phase in both chambers, with signs of alignment emerging alongside continued areas of concern.

In House Commerce, there is a clear shift underway to move away from draft 2.3 and back toward a framework closer to S.71 as passed by the Senate, incorporating updates adopted in Connecticut since the bill has remained in committee for more than a year. This recalibration reflects meaningful progress toward a more regionally aligned baseline.

At the same time, early committee conversations underscore that several key policy decisions remain unresolved. Even within this broader shift toward alignment, significant areas of uncertainty will shape the bill’s overall impact. It remains unclear what data minimization standards will be included in a new draft. There is also ongoing uncertainty around the scope of sensitive data, particularly where Vermont may seek to expand beyond regional norms. The potential reintroduction of a private right of action adds further complexity, as does the evolving approach to exemptions, including the treatment of health data and HIPAA-related entities. Additional questions remain regarding processor obligations, contractual requirements, and how emerging provisions related to artificial intelligence and automated decision-making may ultimately be incorporated.

In parallel, the Senate is considering advancing a separate path with a data privacy amendment to proposed data broker legislation. That effort is occurring alongside broader discussions about integrating elements of S.71, with some senators emphasizing the importance of passing a regionally consistent bill this year rather than risking another session without action.

Outside of the committee process, the broader campaign around this legislation has shifted from substantive policymaking to political theater. A group calling itself “The People vs. Big Tech” has pushed inflammatory attacks against Vermont businesses, business advocacy groups, and others that have engaged on this issue in good faith for years. Led by a sitting legislator and amplified through coordinated advocacy networks, the campaign has relied more on public attacks and performative rhetoric than serious policy engagement.

At the center of the campaign are out-of-state attorneys, consultants, and advocacy interests that stand to benefit financially and politically from a first-in-the-nation framework, regardless of the consequences for Vermont businesses. Rather than advancing informed debate, the campaign has attempted to reduce a complex policy issue into simplistic messaging designed to generate outrage, not solutions.

Despite this dynamic, committee members in the house and the senate have remained focused on the actual policy questions and the practical implications for Vermont consumers and businesses, which will be critical to reaching a balanced and workable outcome.

Across both chambers, a consistent theme emerges. There is growing recognition that regional compatibility matters, particularly for businesses operating across state lines. Vermont employers have reinforced this point directly, with more than 100 businesses signing onto a letter urging policymakers to align with neighboring states and avoid creating an outlier regulatory framework.

The trajectory is moving in a more constructive direction, but the outcome will hinge on the details. Whether the final bill reflects a balanced, regionally consistent approach or introduces new and untested provisions will determine both its viability this session and its real-world impact on Vermont’s business climate.

CONNECT WITH OUR DATA PRIVACY EXPERT

Megan Sullivan

Vice President of Government Affairs

Economic Development, Fiscal Policy, Healthcare, Housing, Land Use/Permitting, Technology

BEYOND THE RHETORIC

Same Vehicle, New Paint; Senate Education Committee Inches Toward Reform

Same Vehicle, New Paint: Senate Education Committee Inches Toward Reform

The Senate Education Committee’s approach to education reform reflects a long-standing pattern in Vermont; broad agreement that the system must evolve, paired with continued reliance on incremental or locally driven changes rather than structural reform at scale.

Last year, Vermont committed to transitioning toward a foundation formula to improve affordability and long-term sustainability. That commitment came with the understanding that if the state was going to ask taxpayers and school districts to operate within a new funding model, governance structures would need to evolve as well. Instead, much of the current conversation in committee has focused on refining the House’s approach rather than advancing structural change, largely preserving a voluntary path to district consolidation.

The House has framed its position through H.955 as a locally led path forward, emphasizing movement toward scale, greater statewide cohesion, and providing communities with the tools to make decisions about the future of their schools. These are important goals. The question now is whether a largely voluntary, process-driven model will deliver those outcomes at the pace and scale required.

For businesses, the stakes extend beyond education. Runaway education spending in recent years have driven affordability challenges for employers and employees alike as property taxes have risen to pay for these continued increases. The Vermont Futures Project Economic Action Plan identifies affordability and fiscal sustainability as essential to improving the state’s economic trajectory, while the Competitiveness Dashboard shows Vermont lagging nationally in economic momentum. Without meaningful cost containment, these challenges will continue to hinder the state’s ability to attract and retain businesses and workers.

The Senate Education Committee’s approach relies heavily on regional study groups to explore mergers and other changes. While the committee strengthened participation requirements and the study process, the core framework remains unchanged: districts are encouraged, but not required, to pursue consolidation.

The bill also advances important conversations around career and technical education and access to workforce pathways. Strengthening these connections is critical, as Vermont employers consistently identify workforce availability and skills alignment as top constraints.

However, the proposal offers limited certainty that the system will achieve the efficiencies needed to stabilize costs over time. A process-heavy approach may build consensus, but it is unlikely to produce near-term savings. For businesses already managing high costs in health care, housing, and taxation, continued uncertainty in escalating property taxes adds to an already challenging environment.

Without clearer movement toward governance reform, Vermont risks layering new funding expectations onto a system not designed for current demographic and fiscal realities. This has direct implications for competitiveness, making it more difficult for employers to invest, grow, and recruit talent.

Vermont has spent years studying education reform. The question now is whether the state is prepared to move from alignment on goals to implementation that delivers measurable savings, stronger workforce outcomes, and a more competitive business climate.

CONNECT WITH OUR EDUCATION EXPERT

Jeremy Little

Policy and Outreach Associate

Environment and Energy, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Transportation

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of May 4, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of May 4, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

Yield: A Committee of Conference was established to reconcile differences between the House and Senate passed versions of H.949, including average property tax increases, the use of one-time funds for tax buydowns, and excess spending threshold provisions.

 

Budget: A Committee of Conference met briefly to begin reconciling differences between the House and Senate passed versions of H.951. As discussions continue, maintaining focus on cost-effective workforce and housing programs will be necessary to ensure long-term economic growth.

 

Tax Conformity: A Committee of Conference was established to reconcile differences between the House and Senate passed versions of H.933. While differences remain, both versions contain important tax conformity updates, such as expansion of the R&D tax credit, reflecting meaningful progress toward strengthening Vermont’s economic competitiveness.

 

Act 250: The House advanced S.325, continuing land use reform momentum, maintaining 2028 interim exemptions, and repeals of tier 3 and the road rule. The bill now returns to the Senate.

 

Event Ticketing: The Senate advanced H.512, moving forward a bill aimed at curbing excessive resale prices of event tickets and strengthening consumer protections for venues using online ticketing platforms. The House is now reviewing the changes made in the Senate.

 

Sister State: The Senate advanced H.674, continuing progress on establishing a process for fostering mutually beneficial relationships between Vermont and other governments. The bill now advances to the Governor’s desk.

 

Vocational Rehabilitation: The Senate concurred with the House’s changes to S.173, advancing a bill that will maintain vocational rehabilitation program stability while evaluating potential improvements. The bill now advances to the Governor’s desk.

 

Housing: The House Ways and Means Committee reviewed S.328, considering amendments to codify the rental revolving loan fund into state law and make technical adjustments to the CHIP and TIF programs. These changes would clarify that the programs may be used alongside special assessment bonds, helping improve access to financing tools for housing and development projects.

 

Unavoidable Use: The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee considered an amendment to S.928 that would add a process for businesses affected by the 2032 phaseout of fluorine-treated containers to seek special exemptions to the ban when no viable market alternative exists. This added flexibility could help businesses continue operations in 2032 where suitable replacements are not yet available.

 

Healthcare Savings: The House Health Care Committee continued review of S.190, moving closer to directing hospital reimbursement rate reductions toward Qualified Health Plans and teachers rather than distributing savings more broadly across insurance markets. With high healthcare costs affecting employers and employees across all markets, concentrating savings within a limited segment could slow broader affordability relief for the wider commercial market.

 

Association Health Plans: The Senate Finance Committee continued review of H.585, discussing potential benefits of Association Health Plans as an additional option for businesses seeking to manage rising healthcare costs. While the proposal could improve affordability for employers and employees alike, the bill remains in committee with only one week left in the session.

 

Telecommunications: The Senate Finance Committee continued review of H.527, considering how best to streamline processes for continued broadband expansion and whether to keep projects out of the Act 250 process for another four years as proposed by the House. Only one week remains to advance this policy.

 

Noncompete: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee continued review of S.230, considering adding language from H.205 that stalled in the House and would broadly prohibit non-compete agreements with limited exceptions. It is unclear if there is a Vermont specific problem this language addresses that is not currently covered by current law and the judicial system.

 

Private Equity in Healthcare: The Senate Health and Welfare Committee advanced H.583, adding flexibility but maintaining problematic precedent relating to regulation and reporting requirements for privately owned businesses. The bill now moves to the Senate Floor.

 

Bottle Bill: The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee continued work on H.915, a proposal that could increase costs for beverage distributors through changes to the state’s beverage container redemption system. Similar proposals have previously been vetoed by the Governor amid concerns over increased costs for consumers, retailers, and distributors.

 

Water Connections: The House Ways and Means Committee advanced S.212, helping reduce delays and costs associated with permitting and development processes. The bill now moves to the House Floor.

 

Wetlands: The Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules continued review of proposed wetlands rules updates, weighing the balance between environmental protection and reducing barriers to housing development through streamlined permitting timelines and processes. These changes would support development in growth areas, affecting only 0.2% of Vermont, while helping address housing shortages, discouraging sprawl, and preserving wetlands.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Strong Privacy, Workable Policy: The Real Debate Around Vermont’s Data Privacy Bill

Strong Privacy, Workable Policy: The Real Debate Around Vermont’s Data Privacy Bill

Vermont Can Protect Privacy Without Hurting Vermont Businesses

The Vermont Chamber of Commerce supports meaningful consumer data privacy protections. Vermonters deserve more control over their personal information, and businesses benefit when consumers trust how their data is handled.

The question before lawmakers is not whether Vermont should protect consumer privacy. It should.

The question is whether Vermont adopts a strong, workable privacy law that aligns with other New England states, or whether it moves forward with first-in-the-nation provisions that have not been tested anywhere else.

What the Senate-Passed Bill Does

S.71, as passed by the Senate, gives Vermonters major new privacy rights. Under the bill, consumers would have the right to:

  • Know if a business is collecting their personal data
  • Correct inaccurate personal information
  • Ask for their personal data to be deleted
  • Get a copy of the data a business has collected about them
  • Opt out of targeted advertising, the sale of personal data, and certain profiling activities

The Senate-passed bill also requires businesses to follow security practices that protect the confidentiality, integrity, and accessibility of personal data.

Why This Matters for Vermont

Vermont businesses are not asking for no privacy law. They are asking for a law that protects consumers while also being clear, fair, and possible to follow.

Many Vermont businesses use basic digital tools to reach customers, sell products, promote events, process transactions, recruit workers, and compete in a modern economy. These are not abstract “Big Tech” companies. They are local employers, nonprofits, retailers, manufacturers, tourism businesses, service providers, and community organizations.

Concerns With the House Draft

The House proposal includes new provisions that go far beyond privacy laws in nearby states like Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire.

These changes could:

  • Pull small businesses and nonprofits into complex regulations
  • Remove opportunities for businesses to fix mistakes before facing penalties
  • Create unclear legal standards that have not been tested in any other state
  • Restrict common digital tools local businesses use to communicate with customers
  • Increase legal risk and compliance costs for Vermont organizations

Strong privacy protections and workable rules are not mutually exclusive. Vermont can do both.

Vermont Businesses Are Speaking for Themselves

More than 100 Vermont businesses and organizations signed a letter urging the House to advance S.71 as passed by the Senate and reject novel, untested provisions.

These are Vermont employers and organizations raising real implementation concerns. They deserve to be heard in the legislative process.

The Bottom Line

This is not a choice between privacy and no privacy.

S.71 as passed by the Senate provides meaningful consumer protections, regional consistency, and a clear path for compliance.

The Vermont Chamber urges lawmakers to support the Senate-passed version of S.71 and reject novel provisions that could create unintended consequences for Vermont businesses, nonprofits, and communities.

CTE Reform Makes Progress

CTE Reform Makes Progress

As Vermont continues to face persistent workforce shortages and growing economic competitiveness challenges, Career Technical Education (CTE) reform has taken on renewed importance as a key part of the state’s long-term strategy.

Legislation advancing through the State House in S.313 reflects meaningful progress toward strengthening Vermont’s CTE system. After initial action in the Senate, the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee advanced a revised version of the bill, now under consideration in the House Education Committee.

The proposal brings together priorities from legislators, the Agency of Education, and the Vermont Association of Career and Technical Education Directors (VACTED), marking a notable step forward on an issue that has seen years of varied approaches. It moves to address longstanding challenges in the CTE system, expanding access, improving consistency in how CTE credits count toward graduation requirements, and creating a pathway and future accountability system moving CTE towards broader finance and governance reform. 

This convergence is significant. After years of fragmented recommendations, stakeholders have coalesced around a shared direction that keeps CTE reform moving forward while positioning it to align with broader education reform efforts underway in the Legislature.

From a workforce perspective, the stakes are clear. Strengthening CTE is vital for retaining the students already here and creating clear, accessible pathways into the workforce. The Vermont Futures Project Economic Action Plan identifies workforce availability as a primary constraint on economic growth, driven by demographic decline and limited population growth. Expanding access to CTE and strengthening connections between education and career pathways will be essential to building and retaining a skilled workforce.

While the bill does not yet implement full structural reform, it reflects coordinated progress and growing recognition across the Legislature of the value of CTE and career pathways. The value of CTEs is also reflected in related efforts, such as the proposed hospitality and culinary apprenticeship pilot in this year’s economic development bill, which begins to connect education programs more directly with in-demand careers and highlights how career pathways can evolve to meet workforce needs.

The progress reflected in this bill continues momentum for CTE and sets a foundation for broader reform in future years. As the Legislature continues its work on education policy, building on this collaboration through clear decisions on funding, governance, and system design will be key to strengthening Vermont’s workforce pipeline and long-term economic competitiveness. 

CONNECT WITH OUR WORKFORCE EXPERT

Jeremy Little

Policy and Outreach Associate

Environment and Energy, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Transportation

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of April 27, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of April 27, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Tax Conformity: The Senate advanced H.933, voting down a floor amendment that would have attached a high-income earner and investments tax proposal and had broad implications for business owners. The bill now returns to the House.
  • Data Privacy: The Vermont Chamber testified before the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee on Draft 2.3 of S.71, outlining clear opposition to the current version while reaffirming support for the Senate-passed bill and openness to updates from what Connecticut passed in 2025 during the 14 months since House receipt. This position is reinforced by a sign-on letter from more than 100 Vermont businesses and organizations urging a balanced, regionally consistent approach.
  • Act 250: S.325 advanced out of House Environment with significant changes to Act 181, including repealing Tier 3 and the road rule, but shortening interim Act 250 housing exemptions from 2030 to 2028. This new version will also create a joint legislative oversight committee and initiate a Vermont Council on Rural Development–led public engagement process on future land use policy.
  • Yield Bill: On a 28-2 vote the Senate advanced H.949 with an average property tax increase of 3.8% using all available onetime funds, compared to the House-passed 7% increase using half those funds. The bill now returns to the House, where a conference committee made up of legislators from both chambers is expected to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill.
  • Budget: On a 23-7 vote the Senate advanced H.951, approving a $9.4 billion budget with additional investments in economic development and housing programs. The bill now returns to the House, where a conference committee made up of legislators from both chambers is expected to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of the budget.
  • Health Care Savings: The House Health Care Committee continued review of S.190, debating the pace of hospital reimbursement rate reductions and whether resulting savings should be limited to Qualified Health Plan (QHP) enrollees or distributed broadly across all insurance markets. As health care affordability remains a growing concern, these decisions will be critical in determining whether cost relief reaches the full commercial market.
  • Economic Development: The House advanced S.327, maintaining momentum on key workforce priorities and new business support tools, but also maintaining the $5 million reduction in annual allocations to the Vermont Employment Growth Incentive. The bill now returns to the Senate.
  • Cannabis: The House Government Operations Committee reviewed S.278, examining the potential impacts of expanding access to cannabis and exploring ways to strengthen the legal retail market. Discussions will continue as the committee works to balance the growth of the industry with appropriate regulatory structures.
  • Tax Classifications: The Senate Finance Committee reviewed H.955, focusing on provisions establishing a future third tax classification and clarifying that commercial apartment buildings would fall under the non-second home category.
  • Wetlands: The Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules began reviewing proposed wetlands rules updates aimed at supporting compact, affordable housing development while aligning with Vermont’s environmental and economic goals. The Vermont Chamber submitted comments in support, and testimony from the Agency of Natural Resources provided data-informed insights driven by the Vermont Competitiveness Dashboard and the Vermont Business Climate Survey.
  • Housing: The House General and Housing committee advanced S.328, adding an annual report on the Vermont Housing Improvement Program to track effectiveness over time and retaining key funding mechanisms and programs to support housing production.
  • Sister State: The Senate Appropriations Committee advanced H.674, concurring with the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee and the House-passed version of the bill. The bill now moves to the Senate floor.
  • Event Ticketing: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee advanced H.512, adding exemptions for independent venues with seating capacities under 3,000 and for nonprofit venues hosting fairs, exhibitions, or community events. These changes provide added flexibility for venues, and the bill now moves to the Senate Floor.
  • Water Connections: The House Environment Committee advanced S.212, helping reduce delays and costs associated with permitting and development processes. The bill now moves to the House Ways and Means Committee
  • Bottle Bill: The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee continued work on H.915, considering changes to incentives for automated redemption machines, increased handling fees, and modifications to the structure of the proposed producer responsibility organization. If advanced, this bill could increase costs for beverage distributors.
  • Non-Compete: The House advanced S.230, returning the bill to the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee where members reviewed changes and signaled interest in replacing employee classification framework with a salary cap that could expand impacts beyond the House-passed version.
  • Healthcare Reform: The Senate Finance Committee reviewed but took no action on H.585, a bill that would allow Association Health Plans in 2028 contingent on federal changes, potentially expanding options for businesses facing high costs. With only two weeks remaining of the session and slow progress to date, the bill risks stalling without immediate action.
  • Aviation Day: The House and Senate Transportation Committees and the Commerce and Economic Development Committee heard from local airports and aerospace industry leaders about the important impact the aviation industry has on Vermont’s economy, driving innovation, manufacturing, and tourism.
  • Net Metering: The House Energy and Digital Infrastructure Committee heard testimony on the state of net metering, focusing on solar affordability and how reforms could shift costs between solar users and ratepayers. While action this session is unlikely, as the Public Utilities Commission continues its rate update process, the issue is expected to return next year.

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Beyond Tax Brackets: How Proposed Tax Changes Impact Vermont’s Businesses, Workforce, and Economy

Beyond Tax Brackets: How Proposed Tax Changes Impact Vermont’s Businesses, Workforce, and Economy

Analysis led by Amy Spear, President, in partnership with the Vermont Futures Project

Overview

The Vermont Chamber of Commerce advances the Vermont economy through advocacy, community, and resources. As part of that work, we analyze how policy decisions intersect with Vermont’s unique economic structure.

A proposal currently under consideration would introduce new tax provisions, including a high-income surtax, an investment proceeds tax, and a minimum tax based on adjusted gross income. While often framed as a tax on wealth, the structure of this proposal means its effects extend well beyond passive income. In Vermont, where the economy is largely driven by locally owned, pass-through businesses, the practical impact reaches into active business operations, workforce competitiveness, and long-term economic growth.

Why This Matters for Vermont

Vermont’s economy is distinct. Most businesses are not large corporations. They are small and mid-sized employers structured as:

  • LLCs
  • S corporations
  • Partnerships
  • Sole proprietorships

In these models, business income flows through to personal tax returns. That means what appears as individual income is often active business income used to operate and grow a company. Understanding this structure is essential to evaluating how tax policy functions in practice.

A Look at Vermont’s Current Tax Structure

Vermont already has one of the most progressive tax systems in the country.

  • Vermont ranks near the top nationally in tax progressivity
  • Higher income earners already contribute a disproportionate share of total income tax revenue
  • Effective tax rates increase steadily across income brackets

This context is important. The conversation is not about whether Vermont has a progressive system. It already does. The question is how additional structural changes interact with Vermont’s economic realities.

What the Proposal Does

The proposal introduces three major changes:

  1. New surcharge layers on higher income taxpayers
  2. A new tax on certain investment-related gains
  3. A minimum tax requiring taxpayers above a threshold to pay a percentage of adjusted gross income

Unlike traditional tax structures based on taxable income, this approach introduces a minimum tax floor tied to gross income, regardless of deductions, reinvestment, or business expenses. This distinction is critical for Vermont businesses.

The Pass-Through Effect: When Business Income Is Personal Income

For many Vermont employers, income reported on a personal tax return is not discretionary income. It may already be committed to:

  • Payroll
  • Equipment and capital investment
  • Insurance and operating costs
  • Debt service

For example, a business owner may report strong income in a given year, but much of that income is reinvested into the business to sustain operations and growth. Policies that do not distinguish between passive income and active business income can create outcomes that do not align with how businesses actually function.

Reinvestment and Growth Implications

Business growth in Vermont often depends on retained earnings. When after-tax resources are reduced, businesses may face harder decisions around:

  • Hiring
  • Wage increases
  • Expansion
  • Innovation

In a state working to grow its economy and address workforce shortages, reinvestment capacity is a key driver of long-term success.

Business Succession and Local Ownership

One of the most significant considerations is the impact on business succession.

When a Vermont business owner retires or sells a company, the transaction often generates capital gains. These are not abstract financial events. They represent years, often decades, of investment and risk.

Changes to how these transactions are taxed can influence outcomes such as:

  • Whether businesses are transferred locally or sold to outside buyers
  • The viability of employee or family ownership transitions
  • The long-term presence of locally rooted businesses

Across industries, from engineering firms to healthcare practices to hospitality businesses, there is increasing pressure from external buyers, including private equity.

When local ownership becomes more difficult to sustain, it can gradually reshape the structure of Vermont’s economy.

Workforce Competitiveness

Vermont is already facing workforce shortages in critical fields, including:

  • Healthcare
  • Engineering
  • Technology

Many of these professions fall within income ranges affected by the proposal. In a competitive regional landscape, policy decisions influence where professionals choose to live and work. Even incremental differences in tax structure can affect recruitment and retention over time.

Economic Stability and Revenue Considerations

A tax system that relies heavily on a small group of high-income filers can introduce:

  • Revenue volatility
  • Greater sensitivity to economic cycles
  • Increased exposure to changes in taxpayer behavior

In a small state, these dynamics can have outsized effects. Long-term fiscal stability is strengthened by broad-based growth that expands the tax base over time.

Affordability and Structural Challenges

Affordability is a central concern for Vermonters. However, it is important to distinguish between redistribution and structural change.

Addressing affordability at its core requires:

  • Expanding housing supply
  • Strengthening workforce participation
  • Managing healthcare costs
  • Improving economic productivity

These are the drivers that reduce costs over time and support sustainable growth.

Alignment with Vermont’s Economic Strategy

Vermont’s long-term strategy, as outlined in the Economic Action Plan, focuses on:

  • Growing the workforce
  • Expanding housing
  • Increasing business investment
  • Strengthening competitiveness

Policies that support these goals help build a larger, more resilient economic base. Policies that constrain reinvestment, complicate succession, or reduce competitiveness can move the state in the opposite direction.

A Path Forward

As Vermont continues to evaluate its policy choices, there is an opportunity to align tax policy with long-term economic goals by:

  • Distinguishing between passive wealth and active business income
  • Supporting business succession and local ownership
  • Preserving reinvestment capacity
  • Evaluating workforce competitiveness impacts

The Bottom Line

In Vermont’s economy, tax policy does not operate in isolation. Because of the state’s reliance on pass-through businesses and locally owned enterprises, changes to personal tax structures can have broad and sometimes unintended effects.

A strong and sustainable Vermont economy depends on policies that:

  • Encourage growth
  • Support local businesses
  • Attract and retain workforce
  • Expand opportunity over time

THE DATA BEHIND THE ANALYSIS

House Commerce Reviews New Draft of Data Privacy Bill

House Commerce Reviews New Draft of Data Privacy Bill

The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee has begun taking up S.71, Vermont’s comprehensive data privacy bill, signaling the issue will be a central focus in the final weeks of the legislative session. The committee walked through a newly proposed draft, providing the first substantive look at how the House may approach the legislation this year.

S.71 was passed unanimously by the Senate early last year, reflecting a careful approach that aimed to balance strong consumer data protection with the operational realities facing Vermont businesses. When the bill was last taken up in the House at the end of the previous session, a proposal was introduced to strike all of the bill’s language and replace it with a significantly more expansive framework, but no further action followed.

The newly discussed draft continues to include provisions that go beyond what is currently in place in other states, raising significant concerns about regional compatibility, compliance burden, and the potential impact on Vermont’s business competitiveness. These issues are central to the viability of the bill and are expected to require substantial discussion and refinement in the weeks ahead.

The stakes remain high for the business community. Data privacy policy continues to evolve rapidly across states, and the structure of Vermont’s approach will have direct implications for competitiveness, compliance costs, and the ability of businesses to effectively operate in a digital economy. The broader policy context also remains relevant.

Two years ago, a more expansive data privacy proposal was vetoed by Governor Phil Scott due to concerns about its impact on businesses and the state’s economic climate. There has been no indication that the Administration’s position has shifted, underscoring the importance of a pragmatic and durable approach as the House considers next steps.

Importantly, committee leadership has indicated a clear intent to work collaboratively with Vermont stakeholders to refine the bill. That approach comes at a critical point in the session, where timing and policy complexity will require focused engagement to reach a workable outcome.

As deliberations continue, the coming weeks will be critical in determining whether S.71 can take shape in a way that aligns consumer protection with economic realities. The Vermont Chamber and its members have been consistently engaged on this issue and looks forward to continued engagement with the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee to support a balanced path forward that works for both Vermonters and Vermont employers.

CONNECT WITH OUR DATA PRIVACY EXPERT

Megan Sullivan

Vice President of Government Affairs

Economic Development, Fiscal Policy, Healthcare, Housing, Land Use/Permitting, Technology

RECENT NEWS

Omnibus Economic Development Bill Advances Through Key Committees

Omnibus Economic Development Bill Advances Through Key Committees

S.327, a comprehensive economic development and workforce bill, was voted unanimously out of both the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee and is expected to be voted on the House floor next week. With the session entering its final stretch, S.327 is emerging as the primary vehicle for economic development policy this year and will return to the Senate following House action.

The legislation reflects a mix of progress and gaps, when measured against priorities identified through the Vermont Chamber’s policy retreats with manufacturers, tourism leaders, and legislators, as well as the data driven recommendations developed from the Vermont Futures Project’s Economic Action Plan and Competitiveness Dashboard.

Key sections of the bill include:

  • Business Resources and Growth
    • Directs the Department of Economic Development to inventory public and private resources available to businesses  identify gaps and improve how those tools are communicated to businesses
    • Aligns with the Vermont Chamber’s priority to improve outreach and coordination of existing programs, addressing a consistent challenge identified by employers.
  • Convention Center Task Force
    • Extends the timeline and expands membership of the task force studying a statewide convention center and performance venue.
    • Continues broader tourism infrastructure discussions, though remains exploratory.
  • Vermont Employment Growth Incentive (VEGI) Revisions
    • Repeals the program sunset but reduces annual allocation cap on incentives from $10 million to $5 million.
    • While it provides long-term certainty for VEGI, it reduces a key tool for attracting and retaining business investment without adding a program aligned with current needs.
  • Culinary and Hospitality Education Study
    • Requires a study on rebuilding Vermont’s hospitality workforce pipeline following the closure of the New England Culinary Institute.
    • Directly reflects priorities identified through engagement with the tourism industry.
  • Hospitality and Culinary Apprenticeship Pilot
    • Establishes a two-year, multi-employer apprenticeship pilot for the accommodation and food services sector.
    • Strong alignment with employer driven solutions to strengthen workforce pathways in a critical sector.
  • Rural Industry Development Grant Program
    • Codifies the program in statute to support business expansion, relocation, and redevelopment.
    • Advances broader goals of supporting regional economic growth.
  • Nickel Rounding for Cash Transactions
    • Allows businesses to round cash transactions to the nearest five cents with required notice.
    • A technical change providing operational flexibility.
  • Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE)
    • Establishes a framework for municipalities to create C-PACE districts, enabling access to private financing for energy efficiency and resiliency projects
    • Supports business investment in infrastructure and long-term cost management.

S.327 advances several priorities shaped by direct employer engagement, particularly in hospitality workforce development and improving access to business resources. These elements reflect ongoing efforts to better align state programs with employer needs and workforce realities.

The bill also leaves key priorities unaddressed. It does not include reforms to improve permitting and regulatory coordination, which remain among the most frequently cited barriers to business investment.  In addition, it does not advance policies to support automation and productivity, both of which are critical in a constrained labor market.

The most significant concern is the direction of the VEGI changes. While the program remains in place, reducing its scale without introducing a modernized alternative limits Vermont’s competitiveness at a time when the state continues to lag behind peer states in economic momentum.

As the bill moves to the House floor next week, attention will focus on final House action before negotiations with the Senate. S.327 represents a meaningful step on several workforce and development priorities, but also highlights the continued need for a more comprehensive approach to economic competitiveness in Vermont.

 

CONNECT WITH OUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXPERT

Megan Sullivan

Vice President of Government Affairs

Economic Development, Fiscal Policy, Healthcare, Housing, Land Use/Permitting, Technology

RECENT NEWS

Issue Updates from the State House | Week of April 20, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of April 20, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Housing: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee reviewed H.775, continuing discussions on the off-site construction pilot program, report timelines, and balancing funding with permitting priorities. It remains uncertain which of the two housing bills advanced this session will move forward as the vehicle to incorporate shared provisions.
  • Bottle Bill: The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee reviewed amendments to H.915, establishing a temporary funding mechanism for moving towards a Producer Responsibility Organization and increasing handling fees on beverage distributors The short-term funding is expected to fall short of the costs required for implementation, while higher handling fees could increase operational burdens across the system.
  • Act 250: The House Environment Committee began work on amendments to S.325, repealing the road rule and tier 3 from Act 181. The bill will add a study on protecting natural resources and create a new oversight committee to deal with increasingly problematic regulatory processes.
  • Education: The Senate Education and Senate Finance Committees began reviewing H.955, addressing both policy and funding components of the bill. With limited cost savings in the House-passed version and three weeks remaining, the bill falls to the Senate to ensure meaningful education finance reform.
  • Mileage Based User Fee: Legislative Committees reviewed changes to H.944, the omnibus transportation bill that would advance a phased-in mileage-based user fee beginning at 1.4 cents per mile for electric vehicles in 2027, with potential expansion to most vehicles by 2031. While ensuring sustainable transportation funding is critical, broader discussions around new fees highlight the need to also address underlying statewide spending challenges.
  • Vocational Rehabilitation: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee advanced S.173, which includes additional education for injured employees and a working group to evaluate potential improvements. This approach maintains program stability while laying groundwork for future enhancements. The bill now moves to the House Floor.
  • Water Connections: The House Environment Committee continued work on S.212, adding streamlined general permits for subdivision of empty land and boundary adjustments. These changes could help reduce delays and costs associated with permitting processes, making development more efficient.
  • Career Technical Education (CTE): The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee advanced S.313, adding additional considerations for student access and transportation. While making few structural changes, the bill queues up alignment with broader reform and moves toward aligning workforce training with industry needs. The bill now moves to the House Education Committee.
  • Sister State: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee advanced H.674, concurring with the House-passed bill. The bill now moves to the Senate floor.
  • Alcohol: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee advanced H.921, adding a requirement that malt beverage manufacturers maintain records of distribution and sales under expanded self-distribution allowances. The bill now moves to the Senate floor.
  • Yield Bill: The Senate Appropriations Committee advanced H.949, allocating $100.9 million in one-time funding for a significant property tax buydown and bringing the average increase to 3.8%. While this approach lowers short-term property tax increases, it relies on anticipated education cost savings that have yet to be realized. The bill now moves to the Senate Floor
  • Tax Conformity: The Senate Appropriations advanced H.933, preserving the language used by the Senate Finance Committee to make targeted updates to Vermont’s tax code, including provisions to enhance the state’s research and development environment. The bill now moves to the Senate Floor.
  • Budget: The Senate Appropriation and Finance Committees advanced H.951, funding a $9.4 billion budget and investing additional onetime funds in additional economic development programs, including the Rural Industrial Development Program, the Small Business Law and Development Centers, and the first generation homebuyer program. These changes reflect thoughtful investments in programs that align efficient spending with growth opportunities. The bill now moves to the Senate Floor
  • Event Ticketing: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee reviewed a new draft of H.512, clarifying definitions of ticket resellers, and adding a 2028 sunset to the regulation as a check back mechanism to ensure effectiveness.
  • Franchise Agreements: The Governor signed into law H.733, a bill requiring businesses filing with the Secretary of State to indicate if the business is operating as a franchisee or franchisor. This new regulation will take effect January 1, 2027.
  • Non-compete: The House General and Housing Committee advanced S.230, creating distinctions between exempt and nonexempt employee non-compete contracts and banning non-competes for non-exempt employees starting on July 1st. The bill now moves to the House Floor

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS