Data Privacy Legislation Prioritized by House Commerce Committee

Data Privacy Legislation Prioritized by House Commerce Committee

The legislature has introduced a new version of a data privacy bill that was discussed last year, pulling from laws in Connecticut and Oregon. The bill contains a small business exemption that will support Vermont’s smallest businesses from undue burden, but it also contains a private right of action that could lead to costly lawsuits. In the absence of comprehensive federal data privacy law, state legislatures have been passing a patchwork of different, and sometimes conflicting, laws.

These laws regulate how companies control and process personal data in an economy that is relying on it more and more. They can be important consumer protection tools but also have the potential to create confusion and challenging burdens in the marketplace. Nationally, the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation has estimated that state privacy laws could impose costs of $98 billion and $112 billion annually. Over 10 years, these costs would exceed $1 trillion. The burden on small businesses would be substantial, with U.S. small businesses bearing $20–23 billion annually.

Substantial New Taxes Pose Greater Risk to Affordability, Demographic Concerns

Substantial New Taxes Pose Greater Risk to Affordability, Demographic Concerns

House and Senate tax committees considered several new or expanded revenue sources to supplement a projected 20% increase in the average property tax bill for the next fiscal year. Addressing the persistent shortfall in the education fund, which struggles to meet the needs of a school system serving fewer students but requiring more resources, is not a new challenge. Introducing new revenue sources without accompanying solutions merely serves as a temporary fix. The Vermont Chamber agrees with the committee members willing to stand up and say that more money is not the solution and that hard conversations about cost containment measures need to happen this session. Specifically, those identified by the Joint Fiscal Office that would allow the education fund to support students without increasing the tax burden on Vermonters, which would only further drive the workforce from the state.

Options under discussion include an excise tax on sugary beverages, increased taxation on candy (including maple), a 6% sales tax on remotely accessed software, and potentially increasing Vermont’s sales tax. Last week, several business organizations sent a joint memo to the chairs of key committees to raise these concerns and request that they implement the changes provided by the Joint Fiscal Office to curtail education spending. Cost containment measures can’t take a back seat, while legislative proposals for increasing the burden on Vermonters are discussed.

Focus Builds on Act 250 Modernization Efforts

Focus Builds on Act 250 Modernization Efforts

With three different Act 250 modernization proposals under discussion in three different committees, stakeholders are optimistic that this could be the year for meaningful reform that includes exemptions. The BE Home bill, H.687, and S.308 each lay out a tiered approach to Act 250 jurisdiction, but differ in the details of how those tiers will be determined and what they include. The Vermont Chamber is encouraging collaboration and voicing support for policies that incentivize new development in and around our community centers as outlined by the Vermont Natural Resources Board report on necessary updates to Act 250.

The Vermont Chamber testified throughout the week before the House Energy and Environment Committee, advocating for sizable, planned growth area designations throughout the state. These would designate both large and small communities, include Act 250 exemptions, and should be large enough to build a substantial number of resilient housing units. Clear housing goals and a comprehensive data-informed plan must be established to address the changing demographic and housing needs. Legislators have an opportunity to leverage resources such as the Vermont Futures Project and VHFA’s Housing Needs Assessment to inform their decisions.