29 Vermont Chamber Members Honored for Worksite Wellness Efforts

29 Vermont Chamber Members Honored for Worksite Wellness Efforts

More than 70 businesses and organizations that employ Vermont workers have been selected to receive a 2022 Vermont Governor’s Award for Excellence in Worksite Wellness, 29 of which are Vermont Chamber members.

The annual award is an opportunity for Governor Scott and Health Commissioner Mark Levine to thank businesses and organizations for their efforts to support the health of Vermonters and in making Vermont a great place to live and work.

Read more about the 2022 Vermont Governor’s Award for Excellence in Worksite Wellness here.

Below are the Vermont Chamber members who received the 2022 Vermont Governor’s Award for Excellence in Worksite Wellness:

Senate Finance Committee Passes Tax Relief Bill

Senate Finance Committee Passes Tax Relief Bill

The Senate Finance Committee passed H.510 which includes a total of $32 million in tax relief proposals, the bulk of which is a Child Tax Credit. The Senate version, with a cost of $22 million a year, carries a three-year sunset and is drastically scaled back from the House version, which creates a permanent program at the cost of $48 million per year. Also included in the Senate version is an expansion of the Child and Dependent Care Credit, a Student Loan Interest Deduction, a Manufactured Homes Tax Credit expansion, and a Social Security exemption expansion. Read more about the fiscal impacts of the bill according to the Joint Fiscal Office.

Comprehensive Act 250 Bill Passes House Committee

Comprehensive Act 250 Bill Passes House Committee

The House Natural Resources, Fish, and Wildlife Committee added to the Act 250 bill, S.234, before it was passed out of Committee. Key provisions included in this expansive bill are:

Municipal Zoning

  • Allows Neighborhood Development Areas (NDAs) to include flood hazard areas if they are suitable for infill development as defined under Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) rules. If the NDA does include flood hazard areas, the local bylaws must contain provisions consistent with ANR’s model Flood Hazard and River Corridor bylaws.
  • Strikes the requirement that NDAs have either a municipal sewer or an approved community or alternative wastewater system.
  • Requires a density of four residential units of any kind within NDA zoning districts.
  • Provides that no municipal land use permit for a site plan or conditional use shall expire in less than two years.
  • Creates the Municipal Bylaw Modernization Grant Program to provide towns with funding to modernize their bylaws to increase housing density and opportunity.
  • Prohibits towns from requiring more than one parking space per bedroom for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).

Act 250

  • Raises the number of Priority Housing Projects that can be exempt from Act 250 in small towns from 25 to 50 units.
  • Amends the exemption section of Act 250, simplifying the exemption for Priority Housing Projects so that no permit or permit amendment is needed, including for permits on existing projects that will include Priority Housing Projects.
  • Requires towns to respond to requests from Act 250 applicants within 90 days or the application shall be deemed to have no unreasonable burden.
  • Language from the previously House passed H.492 to change the Act 250 governance structure.

Forest Blocks

  • Adds new criterion to Act 250-8C which requires applicants to not cause undue adverse impacts to forest blocks, connecting habitats, and rare and irreplaceable natural areas.
  • Requires ANR to map forest blocks and connecting habitat and to establish procedures for updating maps.

Removed from the bill is the Senate’s Road Rule language, which Administration officials have opposed, along with proposals on forest fragmentation and Act 250 governance, while also  advocating for full Act 250 exemptions for housing in state designated areas. It’s increasingly difficult to see how these modest gains in creating new Priority Housing Projects coupled with the expanding overall jurisdiction of Act 250 will lead to progress on the housing shortage crisis for middle income earners.

Economic Development Bill Advances to the House

Economic Development Bill Advances to the House

The omnibus economic development bill that contains several Vermont Chamber priorities, such as business grants, relocation incentives, and marketing funding, finally passed the Senate after the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee added a study of a state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap workaround to the already lengthy bill. This tax relief measure would have either a net neutral or positive impact on state revenues and would provide relief to many businesses. An earlier attempt to add sports betting didn’t succeed, but may be added by the House as the bill advances.

Meanwhile, the Department of Labor testified in the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee again to the strain that the planned $25 supplemental weekly unemployment insurance benefit would put on the aging mainframe system. The Committee considered less onerous alternatives to reduce staff time and costs, including a possible tax credit for unemployment insurance income. Yet to be resolved are the total amount allowable in the budget for these initiatives and ones contained in the omnibus workforce development bill. The Vermont Chamber will work to ensure there is enough funding for both important measures. Contact Amelia Seman to learn more about this bill or share how a SALT deduction cap workaround would impact you or your business.

Senate Passes $8 Billion Budget, Governor Raises the Prospect of a Veto

Senate Passes $8 Billion Budget, Governor Raises the Prospect of a Veto

The Senate passed an $8 billion budget several weeks earlier than anticipated, and the Governor immediately released a statement outlining his concerns, setting up the annual ritual of resolving the three different versions of budget priorities before final adjournment can happen. The Senate’s budget contains $70 million in housing investments, more than $100 million in workforce and economic development to support sectors hard hit by the pandemic, increased investment in childcare providers, $95 million for broadband connectivity, and $30 million in tax relief. The Governor’s concerns center around the Senate budget’s reduced tax relief, insufficient workforce retention and recruitment initiatives, the exclusion of the capital investment program, and reduced funding for Career and Technical Education. At a press conference on Wednesday, Senate leadership defended their bill, promising to be ready to override the Governor’s veto if necessary.

Back in March, the House passed their version of the budget, which included larger investments in the state college system than the Governor had proposed, but left out the middle-income homeownership program, a priority of the Governor. The House-passed bill also left out the roughly $100 million in economic development initiatives from the Governor’s proposal. While the Senate-passed version of the budget is closer to the Governor’s proposed budget, the remaining disparities may be too large for him to accept, setting the stage for a showdown in the final weeks of the session.

The Adult in the Room

The Adult in the Room

With two weeks to go before the target May 6 adjournment, the betting pool is in full swing. Those placing bets in favor of meeting the deadline point to the early budget action by the Senate, which sends the $8 billion appropriations bill to conference committee to resolve the differences between the House and Senate versions. Others have guessed a week later because no one likes working on the Saturday before Mother’s Day and college graduation weekend. Then there are the realists, putting their money down on late May due to Governor Scott’s growing list of disagreements with legislative proposals.

In the last few weeks, the Governor has outlined his disagreements with several legislative proposals, including pension reform, economic development investment, tax relief packages, new program spending, a contractor registry, and housing rental registries. He reportedly made an off-camera comment last week that “someone needs to be the adult in the room” referring to his willingness to veto a budget with spending that goes beyond what he believes is fiscally prudent.

This is typical end-of-the-session posturing, much of which will be negotiated to a compromise before the Legislature delivers these bills to the Governor’s desk. For many policy makers already looking ahead to the November election, the summer campaign season provides additional motivation to reach consensus quickly. In previous years, conventional wisdom might indicate that the Governor has this same motivation, but no opponent has yet announced.

If you’re placing bets in the adjournment pool, make sure you understand the difference between adjournment to a date certain and adjournment sine die, the former allowing for the Legislature to return to consider a veto override and the latter being final adjournment. Either way, you can count on the Vermont Chamber’s five-person lobbying team to be working for you in Montpelier right down to the end.

Bill Updates

Bill Updates
  • S.113 Chemical Regulation: The House Judiciary Committee and House Commerce Committee passed S.113. The bill does not address concerns raised by the Vermont Chamber regarding whether insurance can be written for manufacturers regarding medical monitoring claims for persons exposed to a proven toxic substance.
  • H.159 VEDA Forgivable Loans: The bill is making stops in the Senate money committees before a vote by the full Senate expected soon. The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee received an overview from VEDA of the forgivable loan program in its current form. The Vermont Chamber is connecting with Committee members to continue improving the program.
  • H.715 Clean Heat Standard: The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee began debate on the Clean Heat Standard, H.715, which would require the Public Utility Commission to design a credit trading system in which heating fuel sellers will have to pay others to reduce their customer’s heating oil and propane consumption if they don’t do it themselves. VFDA’s Matt Cota and PGANE’s Leslie Anderson testified to ask the committee to make substantial changes to the bill including a “Check Back” amendment.
  • H.624 Creative Sector: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee took up this bill after it passed the House last week. The Vermont Chamber supports the goals in the bill but does not want to see funding meant to support businesses recovering from the pandemic siloed off for only the creative sector to utilize.
  • H.329 Discrimination: The House General, Housing, and Military Affairs Committee continued working on new language for the bill with a goal of attaching it to H.320 if the Senate sends that bill back to them with amendment. Absent this procedural maneuver, there is no path forward for the bill, which missed crossover.
  •  

Committees Disagree Over Corporate Tax Restructuring and Military Pension Tax Exemption

Committees Disagree Over Corporate Tax Restructuring and Military Pension Tax Exemption

The House Ways and Means Committee unanimously approved the motion not to concur with the Senate Finance Committee’s amendment to S.53, including the stripped down corporate tax changes, impactful adjustments to the military pension tax exemption, and removal of the House supported cloud tax.

Under debate in the corporate income tax restructuring were the proposal to move to a single sales factor and a new graduated corporate minimum rate. Single sales factor would reduce corporate income taxes for corporations with a larger physical presence in Vermont by only factoring in sales in Vermont and not payroll, and property. The corporate minimum proposal would move Vermont to a scale of $250-$100,000, a decrease for the smallest companies and a dramatic increase for larger businesses from what exists today. The House version includes both proposals while the Senate version excludes them both.

The House proposal on Military Pensions would exclude the first $10,000 of federally taxable U.S. military retirement pay. This was changed in the Senate proposal, in which the military retiree, once eligible for social security, would need to choose between exempting their military pension or social security (one or the other, not both).

This bill will now move to a conference committee of Senate Finance members and House Ways and Means members to see if a compromise can be worked out. The Vermont Chamber will continue to advocate for a full exemption to incentivize military retirees to either stay or move to Vermont and increase the diversity of our communities.

Health Insurance Cost Pressures Rising

Health Insurance Cost Pressures Rising

In the February Economic Survey of Vermont businesses, rising health insurance costs was listed in the top three concerns for small businesses. Pressures on the health care system will likely result in higher premiums as the pandemic continues. This was on display as three hospitals asked the Green Mountain Care Board for a rare mid-year rate increase this week. During the process, businesses expressed concern that they could not afford an unplanned insurance premium hike as they continue to feel the impact of workforce shortages, supply chain disruptions, and rising inflation.

Meanwhile, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont (BCBS-VT) brought forth a proposal that could benefit individuals and small businesses that purchase health care in the Exchange. Currently, those markets are set to revert to the pre-2022 configuration which would continue the long-time practice of having businesses subsidize the individuals, increasing premiums for employees to reduce premiums for individuals purchasing their own insurance. Last year, the Legislature approved a one-time reprieve due to federal subsidies that allowed the unmerging of these markets without negatively impacting individuals and simultaneously saving small businesses $17.7 million. The hope is that the federal government will continue those subsidies, but that has yet to happened, which means the rates for small businesses for 2023 could increase again. However, the BCBS-VT proposal could keep the markets permanently unmerged, mostly impacting the individuals in that pool with incomes above $159,000. There would be some impact on other individuals, but the Legislature could choose to spend $1.9 million to mitigate it. This change would result in saving businesses in this market from feeling the return of the $17.7 million cost-shift. This important effort is especially timely as provider rates are likely to increase, whether that is mid-year as currently under discussion by the Green Mountain Care Board or as they review next year’s budgets.

Housing Proposals Taken up in the House

Housing Proposals Taken up in the House

The critical housing omnibus bill (S.226) was approved by the Senate after amending the contractor registry language in hopes of avoiding a gubernatorial veto. While the bill is being reviewed in the House, it has a long road ahead due to the House Natural Resources, Fish, and Wildlife Committee having jurisdiction over the sections related to Act 250 and permitting, while the House General, Housing, and Military Affairs Committee has jurisdiction over housing programs. Additional complications arise from this bill having overlapping language with two other bills under consideration in these committees. 

The House Natural Resources, Fish, and Wildlife Committee also took testimony on the Senate passed S.234, which would make changes to Act 250 to increase housing opportunities in village centers and downtowns. The bill also includes more contested provisions around the creation of a road rule which would trigger Act 250 for new development that create roads or driveways over 800 feet each or 2,000 feet combined. The House General, Housing, and Military Affairs Committees continued to take testimony on S.210, which would create a registry of rental units and program language and funding for the Vermont Rental Housing Incentive Program which would provide $20 million for rental housing rehabilitation and accessory dwelling units.  These two committees will be working on a path forward to either merge or further break apart the three bills under consideration. The Vermont Chamber will continue to advocate for the programs in each bill which will increase the supply of affordable workforce housing.