Issue Updates from the State House | Week of January 20, 2026

Issue Updates from the State House

Week of January 20, 2026

A weekly snapshot of key legislative activity impacting Vermont’s business community. 

  • Workforce Strategy: The House Commerce and Economic Development committee heard testimony from the Office of Workforce Strategy and Development on efforts to support business expansion, increase retention of college graduates, and grow Vermont’s workforce throughout sectors struggling to recruit. Building upon this work remains critical to addressing improving affordability and ensuring that employers have the workforce needed to remain competitive. 
  • Housing Development: The Vermont Chamber testified before the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee, advocating practical housing policies that reduce regulatory burdens and streamline development. Ensuring the legislature continues its focus on tackling Vermont’s housing shortage remains critical to supporting workforce recruitment, business growth, and long-term economic competitiveness  
  • Drifting Priorities: The House Commerce and Economic Development Committee introduced nine new bills this week, many centered on data privacy regulations. As businesses face mounting challenges, it is critical that the committees prioritize proposals that aim to grow economic development and workforce opportunities to support Vermont’s long-term affordability and competitiveness.  
  • Bottle Bill: The House Environment Committee reviewed a bill that would rewrite the state’s beverage container redemption law, setting aspirational targets for redemption rates. The bill also includes potential increased fees for manufacturers to support the expanded system. 
  • Workforce Training: The Senate Education Committee heard testimony from the Vermont Student Assistance Corporation on workforce training programs available to support employee development. These programs offer businesses valuable tools to upskill existing workers or hire job-ready talent. 
  • Flexible Working Arrangements: The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committee reviewed S.230, a bill that would require employers to grant employee requests for flexible working arrangements, shifting the onus to businesses to prove these arrangements would not work.  
  • Career Technical Education (CTE): The House Commerce and Economic Development, House Education, and Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs committees heard testimony on the Administration’s proposal to consolidate CTE leadership under the Agency of Education. The practicality and effectiveness of shifting oversight of this vital system to an agency already burdened by broader education reform efforts will need significant analysis if this proposal moves forward. 
  • Miscellaneous Tax Policy: The House Ways and Means Committee reviewed a miscellaneous tax bill that would make technical changes to the Vermont tax code, including repealing the denial of other state tax credits(OSCR) for S Corporations, aligning them with other passthrough entities. This small shift could simplify tax procedures and make Vermont more hospitable to S Corporations. 
  • Education: The Senate Finance Committee reviewed education reform and funding discussions, hearing a report from the school redistricting task force, which fell short of making required recommendations on district consolidation. With a projected average 12 percent property tax increase looming, debates continue over potential one-time buy-downs. Difficult decisions must be made to rein in education spending and to improve system efficiency. 
  • Energy Code: The House Energy and Digital Infrastructure Committee reviewed H.718, a bill that would push enforcement of existing residential and commercial building energy codes, require new disclosures and training for contractors, and allow municipalities to enforce energy codes alongside the state. If advanced, this bill could add regulatory layers and administrative complexity, a move that directly conflicts with the urgent housing crisis.   
  • Purchase and Use Tax: Following the Governor’s call for a gradual restoration of purchase and use tax revenue to the Transportation Fund, the House Ways and Means Committee briefly introduced H.643, a bill to fully restore that revenue immediately. This move would allow Vermont to continue to meet federal match requirements and maintain $163 million in funding. Urgent action remains essential to ensure the stability and long-term maintenance of the state’s road infrastructure. 
  • Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy Projects (C-PACE): The Senate Natural Resources Committee continued testimony on S.138, a bill proposing to expand the PACE program to include commercial and industrial buildings. The expansion would allow business owners to finance energy improvements and repay the cost over time through a special assessment on its property tax bill. 
  • Wastewater: The Senate Natural Resources committee reviewed S.212, a bill aimed at streamlining the wastewater connections permitting process and enhancing coordination between municipal and state-level permitting systems. This measure would help reduce timelines and increase the efficiency of new development projects.  
  • Corporate Tax: The House Ways and Means committee continued testimony on impacts of selective decoupling from federal tax code changes, which would raise the cost of innovation, increase tax code complexity, and penalize firms investing in productivity and higher-wage jobs. In a state with a shrinking workforce, productivity-led growth is essential, especially as Vermont already ranks near the bottom nationally in business formation, investment momentum, and economic growth.  

CONNECT WITH OUR TEAM

Megan Sullivan

she/her

Vice President of Government Affairs

802-522-6316

RECENT NEWS

Governor Scott’s Budget Signals a Return to Fiscal Reality 

Governor Scott’s Budget Signals a Return to Fiscal Reality

Governor Phil Scott’s 2026 budget address, the second major policy speech of the session following the State of the State, reinforces a clear throughline: Vermont’s affordability crisis is the product of structural imbalance, not a lack of spending. With a $9.4 billion budget proposed without broad-based tax increases, the Governor framed the year ahead as a return to fiscal reality after years of federal stimulus, emphasizing discipline, prioritization, and reform. 

Governor Scott’s budget priorities closely align with the Vermont Chamber’s legislative priority framing to find a unified path toward affordability and economic resilience. The Governor underscored that rising costs in education, healthcare, and energy are crowding out investments in housing, workforce, and community vitality—an assessment consistently reinforced by employer feedback and reflected in the Vermont Competitiveness Dashboard, which shows Vermont’s cost structure as a persistent barrier to growth. This framing is reinforced with targeted investments and policy tools aimed at reducing cost drivers while maintaining support for housing, workforce pathways, and community stability. 

Table of State Government Spending (#46 out of 50)

Education: Cost Containment Must Follow Reform 

Education dominated the address, and for good reason. The Education Fund has grown nearly 40 percent in five years, with property taxes rising more than 40 percent over the same period. At the same time, Vermont continues to face declining enrollment and demographic pressure, underscoring a growing mismatch between cost and scale. The Governor’s call to complete Act 73, paired with targeted property tax relief and an openness to spending caps, aligns with the Chamber’s position that affordability cannot be achieved without bending the cost curve. 

Notably, the budget pairs cost containment with continued investment in workforce-aligned education pathways, including dual enrollment, early college, adult education, and the Vermont Trades Scholarship Program, reinforcing the need to connect education spending with labor market outcomes.  

Housing: Aligning Investment with Permitting Reform 

The budget continues strong support for housing, including permanent funding for the Vermont Housing Improvement Program and renewed Downtown and Village Center Tax Credits. Just as important is the focus on reducing the regulatory barriers that slow housing construction. The Vermont Chamber has long argued that money alone cannot solve Vermont’s housing shortage without regulatory alignment, and the Governor’s emphasis on both supply and speed reflects that reality. 

Energy and Healthcare: Affordability as a Competitiveness Issue 

The Governor’s critique of rising energy and healthcare costs mirrors what Vermont employers experience daily. Vermont consistently ranks poorly on energy affordability and healthcare cost indicators relative to peer states, placing upward pressure on wages, benefits, and operating costs. Within the proposed budget, this focus is reinforced through tools aimed at stabilizing healthcare costs and premiums, including authority to pursue federal waiver strategies and investments designed to preserve access while improving affordability. The Governor’s call to recalibrate energy policy toward affordability and reliability, and to expand healthcare choice while lowering costs, aligns with the Chamber’s advocacy for pragmatic solutions that protect both households and job creators. These systems directly shape Vermont’s cost structure and its ability to attract and retain workers. 

Public Safety and Workforce Stability 

In his FY26 budget address, Governor Phil Scott framed public safety investments, accountability reforms, and expanded treatment and recovery services not simply as social policy, but as essential economic infrastructure. The Governor’s budget proposal reinforces this framing through targeted investments that expand pretrial supervision capacity, strengthen accountability measures, and increase access to treatment and recovery services, explicitly recognizing that public safety, stability, and workforce participation are deeply interconnected. Safe downtowns, reliable workforce participation, and functional systems matter to every sector of Vermont’s economy and are foundational to business confidence and community vitality. 

The Bottom Line 

The budget reflects a disciplined approach grounded in the reality that Vermont cannot spend its way out of an affordability crisis. The Governor has laid out a framework that prioritizes reform over rhetoric. The challenge now shifts from diagnosis to execution. 

As the session advances, the Vermont Chamber will remain focused on ensuring these proposals translate into durable policy that restores affordability, predictability, and long-term economic resilience for businesses and communities statewide. 

CONNECT WITH OUR TAX EXPERT

Amy Spear

President

Fiscal Policy, Taxation, Tourism and Hospitality, Workforce Development

RECENT NEWS

The State of Health Care as the Legislature Gets to Work 

The State of Health Care as the Legislature Gets to Work

As the 2026 legislative session begins, health care costs remain one of the most pressing challenges facing Vermont employers. Open enrollment closed last week, and early feedback from Vermont Chamber members is consistent: costs are crushing, and there are no easy choices. Large group plans increased by an average of roughly 15 percent, small group plans also rose, and the loss of federal subsidies forced many sole proprietors and employers into impossible decisions to cover plans they couldn’t afford or drop coverage all together. 

While rising health care costs are a national issue, Vermont remains an outlier on both cost and competitiveness. Vermont has just two insurance carriers and offers only 13 plans, while New Hampshire employers can choose from 78. Monthly family premiums in Vermont can exceed $2,756, significantly higher than comparable plans just across the border. For small employers, the impact is severe: a five-person business can pay more than $8,500 per month for coverage alone. These differences are not abstract. They show up in constrained wage growth, delayed investments, and difficult conversations with employees every renewal cycle. 

Last year, the Legislature took meaningful steps to address health care costs, resulting in more than $200 million in hospital operational savings. Hospitals have identified another $100 million in potential reductions over the next two years. In that period hospitals will transition to reference-based pricing, an important structural reform. These changes matter, but they take time to translate into lower premiums, and employers are feeling the strain now. 

This session must focus on what comes next to continue bending the cost curve. Strengthening primary care is a critical conversation. Greater access to primary care can reduce reliance on high-cost hospital services, improving outcomes while lowering system-wide costs. A bill under consideration in the Senate explores financial supports for primary care that can’t come on the back of already stressed commercial payers. This plan also raises a fundamental question: How do we attract and retain physicians in Vermont if broader economic conditions make it difficult to live and work here? Housing availability and tax policy are not side issues; they are central to solving Vermont’s health care workforce challenges. 

Lawmakers are also considering a far-reaching bill related to private equity in health care with significant implications for providers, patients, and employers alike. Given its scope, the House Health Care Committee will take significant time to fully understand its implications and work through serious unintended consequences. 

Any serious effort to reduce premiums must address the size and stability of the insurance risk pool. This would include reestablishing association health plans that employers relied on for decades to access competitive plans. Additional proposals could bring teachers and municipal employees into the pool. As businesses and working Vermonters are being asked to make increasingly difficult choices, it is essential that those whose salaries are supported by tax payments from employers and employees alike are open to actively partnering in solutions.  

CONNECT WITH OUR HEALTH CARE EXPERT

Megan Sullivan

Vice President of Government Affairs

Economic Development, Fiscal Policy, Healthcare, Housing, Land Use/Permitting, Technology

RECENT NEWS