House Advances Property Tax Hikes and Delays Reform

House Advances Property Tax Hikes and Delays Reform

Amid a $200 million increase in education spending, instead of making meaningful reform with cost containment measures, the House Ways and Means Committee has advanced legislation that includes double-digit property tax increases and adds more expenses for businesses. To pay for an increased property tax credit, the non-homestead tax would increase to 18%, 3% higher than the homestead rate. A cloud tax would also be implemented, including software as a service, platform as a service, and infrastructure as a service. Additionally, the bill proposes a $200,000 “Commission on the Future of Public Education” that would take 18 months to further study and make recommendations on how to improve the system. This means that rate increases will not be addressed this year and Vermonters could face another high increase again next year.

In written testimony, the Commissioner of the Tax Department stated, “The proposal to increase property tax credits for FY25 is not a reduction in total property taxes, but a cost shift that renters and businesses will pay. This is a puzzling approach when you consider the affordability crisis renters and employers currently confront.” Sending the issue to yet another study would not address the immediate needs of Vermonters. Meanwhile, in addition to property tax increases, the House has already passed $125 million in tax increases earlier this session.

Housing and Act 250: A Historic Compromise With a Poison Pill

Housing and Act 250: A Historic Compromise with a Poison Pill

The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee combined the Senate’s housing bill with the House’s Act 250 modernization bill, creating a 171-page omnibus bill. While much of the legislation incorporates a historic compromise on Act 250, a substantial poison pill remains. Appeals of Act 250 permits would move from the environmental courts to a newly established professional board. The Vermont Chamber is advocating against this transition. A legal appeal of a complicated development process requires a legal review in a court, not an informal review by a politically appointed quasi-judicial board that does not have legal expertise.

The Vermont Chamber has supported a compromise of establishing a working group to dig into underlying issues that result in Act 250 appeals leading to timely and expensive disputes and ultimately development delays and how best to address them. The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee has done a walk-through of the bill and is looking at opportunities to bolster parts of the bill that will address Vermont’s housing crisis. With only weeks remaining in the session, the bill still has several more hoops to jump through before reaching the Governor’s desk. As it currently stands, it is poised for a veto.